Subscribe to EDN
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

Way too cool

Using two recent real-world examples, Howard Johnson considers the drawbacks of rapid adoption of large-scale societal change.

By Howard Johnson, PhD -- EDN, February 4, 2010

In mid-2005, the Hilton family of hotels mandated installation of the official Hilton Family Clock Radio in 250,000 rooms. This wonderful labor-saving device was designed to rectify two long-standing problems at the hotel: the tendency of guests to foul up traditional clock-radio settings and the burden imposed on hotel staff of checking and maintaining the correct time.

Hilton’s clock designers overcame the first difficulty with four buttons atop the unit. These buttons are pre-set to radio stations that local hotel management selects. With this design, you can wake to one of the hotel’s stations, the buzzer, or nothing. No longer can pesky hotel guests leave the machine inadvertently dialed to an alternative radio station or white noise (my personal favorite wake-up sound).

Regarding the time-maintenance burden, careful studies of clock inaccuracy must have implicated those same pesky hotel guests. I can just imagine the hotel’s management, red-faced and furious, demanding that guests be forever barred from messing up the otherwise perfectly good time-keeping technology provided to them. In response, the designers removed all user-accessible time-adjustment controls from the new clock.

There is no little “time” switch on the back, no pinhole for a paper clip, and no combination of buttons that can adjust the time. Only a certified hotel maintenance engineer can adjust it. The engineer must physically access the clock, remove a Phillips screw near the top on the back, pop off the lid, and depress the “time” button inside to make the adjustment. It’s a slow process.

The “no user-accessible controls” strategy requires that the clock be made superaccurate; otherwise, the extreme maintenance hassle of making even occasional adjustments would invalidate the new clock’s entire raison d’être. Toward that end, the developers equipped the clock with a precise internal time reference and a computer-controlled feature that automatically adjusts for daylight-saving time. The clock is so smart and so accurate that, in the opinion of its designers, it never requires adjustment. Initial user reviews said things like “Best clock ever made by man” and “Nice features, easy to read.”

Read more of Howard Johnson's Signal Integrity columns.

Fast-forward to Sunday, Oct 30, 2005. That day, hotel guests all across Arizona missed their flights. Arizona does not observe daylight-saving time, yet the Hilton family clocks in Arizona hotels did. Early Sunday morning, all the new clocks “fell back” precisely one hour, according to their programming, and all the guests woke an hour late. Needless to say, panic ensued. A month later, when I visited a Hilton family hotel in Tucson, AZ, the hotel building engineer still wasn’t finished changing all the clocks. He said, “We’ll be done in about six months.” Official word from Hilton headquarters came down that the problem affected only some states, and those states would still be required to use the new clocks.

Fast-forward again to March 11, 2007. During that year, Congress changed the daylight-saving-time law in the United States to a different day than previously. Most Hilton family clocks in the United States now require major engineering maintenance four times a year.

Am I making a point? Anyone who ships product to a vast number of installations covering a wide range of application scenarios can tell you what I am talking about. Unanticipated effects always crop up in the field.

This winter, we as a nation found out that incandescent traffic lights emit plenty of infrared heat through the colored lens—enough to melt drifting snow that otherwise would accumulate, obscuring the lens. Wonderful new, energy-efficient LED traffic lights do not emit that much heat (Reference 1).

Bad clocks just make people late. LED traffic lights clog with snow, become indiscernible, and cause fatal traffic accidents.

Rapid adoption of large-scale societal change is a bad idea. For example, when our government talks about nationwide health care, I think we should try it for a while in one state first to see whether it works. How about, say, Massachusetts?




Reference
  1. Saulny, Susan, “LED Signals Seen as Potential Hazard,” The New York Times, Jan 1, 2010.

Author Information
Howard Johnson, PhD, of Signal Consulting, frequently conducts technical workshops for digital engineers at Oxford University and other sites worldwide. Visit his Web site at www.sigcon.com or e-mail him at howie03@sigcon.com.
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Canon Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
Related Content

No related content found.

  • 0 rated items found.
Advertisement

KNOWLEDGE CENTER

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Engineering Careers
Jobs sponsored by
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows