TV manufacturers power down
A new Energy Star specification requires dramatic reduction in power consumption while California considers instituting mandatory power limits.
By Tam Harbert, Contributing Editor -- EDN, May 26, 2009
TV manufacturers have made great strides in reducing the power consumption of their products over the last couple of years. But the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Energy Star program, as well as at least one state, is pushing them to cut consumption even more.
In November 2008, Energy Star finally published a specification that set power consumption limits for TVs when they were turned on. Previous Energy Star ratings did not include limits for active power consumption because manufacturers could not agree on how to measure it fairly across all TV display technologies. Because the specification had been discussed for at least 18 months, manufacturers were well prepared.
“We saw fabulous response from manufacturers,” said Katharine Kaplan, EPA team lead, Energy Star product development. “Their 2008 lines were much less consumptive than previous versions.” Although the EPA has no formal tally, Kaplan estimates that the vast majority of TVs now on retail shelves meet the spec.
|
Although that sounds great, Energy Star won’t stop there. The program tries to set requirements stringent enough that only 25% of products are able to meet them. So “now we need to sharpen our pencils and drive for greater efficiency,” said Kaplan.
In late April the EPA proposed Tier 2 and Tier 3 specs. While the current requirement (Tier 1) for active power consumption is 208W, Tier 2 would lower that to 115W by May 2010 and to 81W by May 2012. (These are for a typical 42-inch screen size, regardless of technology.) In addition, the new specification would add power consumption limits for a download acquisition mode. Some of the latest TV models automatically download content, such as TV program listings, from the Internet, which uses power when the TV is presumably turned off. That amount of power exceeds the 1W limit for standby power in the Energy Star standard, so the program wants to propose a power allowance and a duration for download acquisition mode, said Kaplan.
The EPA also is adding a luminance requirement. The Tier 1 spec encouraged manufacturers to include a “forced menu.” This menu is designed to allow retailers to set the TV at its brightest setting – the “vivid” mode, which makes it look best on store shelves but also consumes more energy – while also prompting home users to turn down the brightness levels when they take it home. This “home” mode can consume 30% less energy, said Kaplan.
However, problems arose when some manufacturers set the home mode too low compared to the vivid mode. Consumers who saw a bright picture in the store would be disappointed with the home mode. They would then change back to the vivid mode, defeating Energy Star’s goal of saving power. Energy Star is trying to correct that by requiring that the home mode be set at no less than 80% of the highest luminance level.
The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) did not officially responded to the EPA proposal by press time, but Kaplan said manufacturers are not happy about the dramatic power-consumption reduction nor the new luminance requirement. “The new spec is extremely challenging,” said Mark Sharp, group manager for the corporate environmental office of Panasonic Corp of North America. “It’s difficult for most manufacturers including Panasonic to meet in terms of our mid-sized models, anything from 26 inches to in the 50 inches.”
Sharp points out that manufacturers have reduced power consumption by an average of 40% over the last two years. By dropping its spec to 115W, the new Energy Star proposal cuts power consumption another 50% on top of that. “We're talking about getting down to the wattage of a single light bulb for a 42-inch TV,” he said.
As for the luminance requirement, Sharp pointed out that the TVs will be shipped from the manufacturer set in home mode and that most consumers would not change the settings.
| 2007 | 35 million |
| 2008 | 37.6 million |
| 2009 | 36 million |
| 2010 | 37 million |
Meanwhile, TV makers are waiting to see what happens at the California Energy Commission (CEC), which has proposed energy standards for TVs sold in the state. It would require 42-inch TVs to consume 183W or less by 2011, dropping to 115.5W by 2013. Although the proposed rules would be less stringent than and go into effect later than Energy Star’s Tier 2, manufacturers have launched a full-scale campaign to try to defeat the measure. That’s because the California standard would be a requirement, whereas Energy Star is voluntary.
“On one hand, it's completely unnecessary from a policy standpoint,” said Doug Johnson, senior director of technology policy for CEA. “On the other hand, it’s seriously detrimental to the marketplace in terms of its economic impact.”
In April, CEA released a study that said CEC’s proposal would harm consumers, businesses and government tax revenues. The study, commissioned from consultant Resolutions Economics LLC, claims that the requirement would lead to higher prices on TVs as well as store closings, increased unemployment and lost tax revenues because a significant share of TV models would have to be pulled off retail shelves.
The biggest fear of TV manufacturers may be that such energy efficiency rules will spread to other states. According to Sharp, the legislatures in three other states – Washington, Maryland, and Massachusetts – have proposed similar rules, although the proposals have not been adopted.
-
I think EPA efficiency regs that permit the TV screen brightness to be increased for showroom display, then require the brightness to be reduced for delivery to the home, are deceptive.
Jerry Goerz - 2009-2-7 19:51:00 PDT -
One interesting point, ignored completely, is the effect on backlight life and on display life as the mode is changed. We know this relationship exists, but the reality is probably too horrible for comsumers to be allowed to know. One easy out is to have continuously variable display paarameters, like the older tube-type TV sets had. Probably no more than half of the users would be to stupid to learn how to use these adjustments, and they would allow reaching a compromise setting, perhaps.
William Ketel - 2009-4-6 14:11:00 PDT -
Focus should also extend to power-off consumption. Focus should also be placed on ensuring that switchmode power supplies don't generate more RF noise and spurious emissions (i.e. don't skimp on suppression components). Finally, there needs to be a real transition plan based on achievable goals, rather than an uninformed ivory-tower mandate that requires a step change.
arclight - 2009-4-6 11:13:00 PDT -
Some type of waver should be given to consumers that power their homes with renewable energy, such as Solar or Wind.
Keith Kyllonen - 2009-4-6 10:52:00 PDT -
Can we also get the manufacturers to use an on/off switch?
Not the silly things that put it in standby mode, but a real mechanical switch which gives zero energy consumption.
This would also save a lot of energy.
Yes, you can plug it into a power strip, but why should you have to correct a product as soon as you buy it?
Brian Wiley - 2009-2-6 12:44:00 PDT
