Linearity
What is the meaning of linearity, and why should I care?
Howard Johnson, PhD -- EDN, September 9, 2010
| View as PDF |
My good friend Chris “Breathe” Frue is a talented musician, a
trained audio engineer, and an excellent conversationalist.
He asked recently, “What is the meaning of linearity, and why
should I care?”I took a long puff on my pipe and answered slowly, “Well, linearity is one of two properties essential for good signal fidelity—audio or otherwise. The other property is time invariance. A linear, time-invariant system responds equally well to loud and to soft inputs, whether composed of one sound or many.”
“You are just waving your hands,” Breathe said. “I don’t buy it. There must be some more-concrete definition.”
“There is,” I replied. “It’s tricky to
state the whole thing, so I’ll begin with
a necessary condition, meaning that
every linear system
must at
least do this task.
The condition
is called scaling.
Scaling means
that, if you turn
up the volume
on the system
input, the system
response scales
proportionately.
Your guitar amplifier,
for example,
has the property
of scaling.” (Breathe plays a fine old
arch-top jazz guitar. He uses a Mackie
mixer driving a linear studio-quality
monitor to produce a clean sound.
He doesn’t need distortion because his
technique is impeccable.)
“I don’t believe that,” Breathe said.
“Look, if I tweak the volume knob
on my guitar to 5, it sounds one way.
If I turn it up to 10, the club manager
comes over and tells me to turn it down. So the response is totally different
in those two cases.”
“Yes,” I answered. “And your speaker
probably distorts at the high setting,
too, so that won’t be the same either,
but what I’m saying is that, if you keep
the volume in a reasonable range, then
scaling works.”“Does the term ‘reasonable range’ include a setting of zero?” he asked.
“Of course, zero is a perfectly valid input signal for any linear system,” I said. “The output would be zero.”
“But it’s not,” said Breathe. “Even when I set my guitar to zero, a little hiss always comes out of the speakers. So the amp is not, according to your definition, linear for either large-scale or small-scale inputs.”
At this point, I realized that, through earlier such conversations, I had already taught Breathe far too much about electrical engineering. His questions were becoming dangerous. My next columns will lay out for him, in a methodical but simple way, the whole concept of linear-time-invariant behavior so he can understand its importance, not only as a tool for modeling but as an ideal standard of behavior against which you can measure circuit performance.
On another topic, a recent article (Reference 1) generated a lot of reader responses. Here are some of the more oft-repeated ideas. First, the precise values for the 10% resistor scale (10, 12, 15, 18, 22, 27, 33, 39, 47, 56, 68, and 82) nearly fit an exponential scale. The steps are adjusted so that the tolerance bands in most cases overlap. For example, the nominal value of 68Ω−10% gives 61.2, slightly smaller than 56+10%, which equals 61.6. Only the gaps from 12 to 15Ω and 18 to 22Ω violate this rule. Because most of the bands overlap, almost any resistor you manufacture fits into some tolerance band somewhere on the scale. Few parts go to waste, and manufacturers love this fact. The other tolerance scales—20, 5, and 2% and so on—have similar overlapping properties.
Next, if you file the side of a carbon-composition resistor, notching through its outer coating into the bulk carbon layer, you can raise its resistance. This approach makes every resistor a “variable resistor.” A drop of lacquer reseals the outer coating. Don’t file too far!
Finally, the value of a carbon-composition resistor drifts with temperature and with age. If you want long-term stability, you must prebake your resistors.
|
Reference |
|
Talkback
-
I like to use this definition for linearity: there is no frequency component in the output that is not present in the input. There can be less (eg. a filter) but not more. Scalability is a natural consequence.
Earl McCune - 2010-14-9 12:00:30 PDT -
You said "Finally, the value of a carbon-composition resistor drifts with temperature and with age. If you want long-term stability, you must prebake your resistors." Carbon comps also undergo very significant resistance changes vs applied voltage - it's not a heating issue, it's voltage coefficient of resistance (a non-linearity). I once did qualification tests on carbon comp resistors for extreme high-rel applications and rejected a batch of resistors for being out of tolerance. I was informed that they'd only be in-tolerance if tested with 90 volts applied - I had tested with much lower voltage applied (as with most conventional ohm-meters.
Bill Whitlock - 2010-9-9 11:59:33 PDT


















