Silicon TV tuners: The game is on
Performance, cost and frequency attributes give silicon TV tuners the edge as they play kick the can with their predecessors.
Paul Rako, Technical Editor -- EDN, September 23, 2010
At A Glance
|
| View as PDF |
Silicon-tuner ICs have for nearly a decade found
use in set-top boxes for satellite and cable.
Now, thanks to their high performance, simplicity,
broad frequency coverage, compactness,
and universality, they are making inroads
into phones, set-top boxes, service gateways,
automobiles, PCs, and even TVs. What’s more,
they use no SAW (surface-acoustic-wave) filters
and few supporting components, making them
more reliable and less costly than their can-tuner predecessors.
Once TV manufacturers gain expertise in RF (radio-frequency)-PCB (printed-circuit-board) layout, you can expect silicon tuners
to obsolete their predecessors, can tuners (Figure 1).
William Chu, director of RF products at Maxim Integrated Products, notes that reducing the cost of a can tuner has reached fundamental limits and that silicon tuners can provide frequency to as much as 1 GHz. The TV market represents the last frontier for these tuners. IC companies developed these chips by exploiting the fact that cable-TV channels all have similar signal strength, making it easier to tune into a station than tuning broadcast-TV signals with widely different strengths. This task also depends on the distance from the transmitter and the transmitter’s power level. Satellite and cable signals with digital modulation are also easier to tune. The engineers who created the digital-modulation standards ensured that the signals were easier to tune and demodulate than those of an analog TV.
The woes of analog TV
Although energy distribution in an analog signal is good for your reception, it makes it harder to keep adjacent channels from interfering with each other in a tuner. The greater power at the edges of the band easily bleeds into the channel next to it. The combination of widely different signal strength, often on adjacent channels, and the energy spectrum in an analog TV’s RF signal poses a great challenge to silicon-tuner designers.
Before you discount the importance of analog reception, remember that most of the world still uses analog. In the United States, for example, analog transmission is still legal for low-power stations and legacy stations that cannot afford to convert to digital modulation. In addition, the United States’ northern and southern neighbors, Canada and Mexico, still broadcast analog TV. US consumers expect their TVs to be able to receive stations from these countries. Many other countries’ conversion to digital modulation won’t take place for years. The problems of digital-TV reception may well slow the adoption of digital TVs in countries that have not yet converted. Furthermore, many cable-TV systems still broadcast the local channels as analog signals, and a cable-ready TV must be able to receive these signals. “Taking analog reception out of a TV is fraught with peril,” says Brian Mathews, vice president of marketing at silicon-RF-tuner manufacturer Xceive. “No TV manufacturer would consider it.” So, although the law no longer dictates that a TV must receive analog, manufacturers will provide it for at least the next 10 years.
Another benefit of TV-tuner ICs that work with analog signals is that, if the chip can handle the broad signal variations of an analog transmission, it can also work in rural China, where cable-TV systems’ grossly overmodulated and undermodulated signals lack proper leveling. Silicon-tuner ICs also can handle future changes. The standards body for the ATSC (Advanced Television Systems Committee) can change specifications or improve the modulation so that it works for mobile TVs, and the analog tuner chip still works. The same manufacturers of analog chips also design programmable demodulator chips, so you can update firmware to provide for future changes. Silicon tuners also make practical white-space transmission of signals in bands without TV channels (see sidebar “TV tuners and white space”). Because the silicon tuners have better blocking of adjacent channels, a 5W data transmitter near your house does not interfere with the microvolt signals from a TV station 50 miles away that happen to enter the adjacent channel.
TV-tuner specifics
A TV tuner must downconvert a 54- to 862-MHz RF signal to an IF (intermediate frequency), typically of 38 or 45 MHz; amplify the signal to a standard level using AGC (automatic-gain-control) circuits; and attenuate or reject all the signals that are out of the band of the channel you are tuning. A stronger signal may be immediately next to the signal of interest, making these tasks challenging. When the tuner encounters UHF (ultrahigh-frequency) signals as large as 700 MHz, the filtering function must have a high Q (quality) factor. Like quartz crystals, SAW filters have high Q factors, so they can pass one narrow frequency, and the response quickly rolls off, or attenuates. To achieve the same performance as that of SAW filters, some silicon-tuner manufacturers upconvert the lower-band signals to high frequency, filter them with high-Q silicon circuits, and then downconvert the filtered signal to IF. This double conversion works well, but it consumes more power than do other methods. Other companies use novel circuits and proprietary architectures to get their chips to work better than a can tuner.
A TV front end has two important
functions. The tuner function downconverts
and amplifies the desired channel.
The demodulator function creates the
baseband analog or digital signal from
the RF IF that comes from the tuner. The
analog signal is a classic composite-video
signal, and the digital channels usually
demodulate to an MPEG (Moving Picture
Experts Group)-2 digital bit stream
(Figure 4). The demodulated signals then go to an SOC (system on chip) that
creates the LCD’s pixel-drive signals and
handles analog- and digital-audio signals.
Melissa Chee, director of marketing at
Fresco Microchip, notes that silicon-tuner
manufacturers bring an overall system
knowledge of how the silicon tuners and
silicon demodulators work together. IC
designers divide these blocks—but not
in a standard way. For example, Maxim,
Entropic, and other companies make
tuner ICs with no demodulator, Silicon
Labs and Xceive include analog demodulation,
and Fresco makes demodulator
chips that work with tuner ICs (Figure
5). In yet another approach, some chip
sets require an external tracking filter but
integrate the tuner and both demodulators into one IC. TV manufacturers evaluate
each of the systems with combinations
of various vendors using proprietary
test screens. TV vendors, meanwhile,
jealously guard their test patterns because
they don’t want their competitors
to know how they design the TV for certain
scenes and action. Be prepared for
TV manufacturers to put you “through
the wringer on analog performance,” says
Xceive’s Mathews.
Sensitivity and selectivity are the fundamental
specifications of tuners. Sensitivity
indicates how faint an input signal
can be for the receiver to successfully receive
it. A sensitive tuner chip requires
a low noise factor in the RF front end
(Figure 7). The selectivity spec of a radio
is a figure of merit relating to how
well a tuner chip can receive one channel
without disturbance from a nearby
channel or intentional interferer, such
as an FM-radio station. TV engineers
often express selectivity as near-channel
blocking. Because these signals can have
larger amplitude, it makes broadcast-TV
tuning a demanding engineering task.
As you can see, silicon tuners for TVs have one of the most difficult tasks of any mixed-signal IC. They must work at frequencies as low as 54 MHz without external coils or inductors, as high as 862 MHz for broadcast TV, and as high as 1 GHz for cable systems. They must handle both analog- and digital-modulation schemes and schemes that depend on regional variations. In addition to the broadcast-TV-modulation standards, silicon ICs must also handle cable-modulation standards, such as 256QAM (256-point QAM). The input signals to a tuner IC also can have signals of only −80 dBm next to signals of −20 dBm—even higher in locations near transmitter towers. To meet consumers’ expectations, silicon tuners and demodulators deliver performance exceeding that of can tuners, and they fit into the small spaces of modern slim-LCD TVs.
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic,” said the late Arthur C Clarke, a British science-fiction author, inventor, and futurist, in 1961. The high performance and low cost of silicon TV-tuner ICs will soon be performing magic in a large proportion of the 500 million tuner systems people buy every year.
You can reach Technical Editor Paul Rako at 1-408-745-1994 and paul.rako@cancom.com.
|
References |
|
|
For More Information |
||
|
Entropic |
Maxim Integrated Products |
Silicon Labs |
|
Fresco Microchip |
MaxLinear |
Xceive |
|
Linear Technology |
National Semiconductor |
|
|
Marvell |
NXP |
Talkback
-
The sidebar on interference from white space is opinion, not real information.
The FCC has tested for interference and found none. Provisions for microphones have been made.
The majority of TV viewing is through Cable or Satellite TV and now online.
Promoting technologies like white space is the best way to more efficiently use the rich spectrum resources currently allocated to TV.
TektonikShift - 2010-13-12 11:26:40 PST -
Why do I get this via a'Electronic News Today' on 10/4? An article that was published 9/23? Almost 2 weeks later. What part of 'Today' is 2 weeks later?
I can TellTime - 2010-4-10 13:24:02 PDT -
My favorite tuner is an IPv6 address...that's where it's all going, IMO
Andy T - 2010-24-9 15:59:33 PDT -
This is an interesting article, although the details of how a silicon tuner actually functions were sort of not very detailed. How they achieve selectivity, especially adjacent channel rejection, would appear to be magic, at least. Selectivity, sensitivity, and low cost have been challenging the TV tuner industry for almost as long as televisions have been made, the reality has been good or cheap, never both.
A detailed discussion of exactly how the silicon tuner has all of these benefits would be a most interesting article, although, as I think was alluded to already, the methods are probably proprietary. But whatever could be told would probably be worthwhile.
William Ketel - 2010-23-9 18:31:44 PDT





















