Wafer Scale Emerging
Numerous configurations have been developed
By Brandon Prior, Prismark Partners -- Electronic News, 1/22/2001
![]() |
|
In 2000, the electronics industry consumed 1.8 billion die in flip-chip form and 14 percent of these were wafer CSPs. The principal difference between a wafer CSP and a flip-chip die (according to Prismark's definition) is that a wafer CSP is post processed after the fab with larger bump pitches, whereas a flip-chip die will be completed in the fab. Flip-chip designed die will only need to have underbump metallurgy (UBM) and bumps placed on it before assembly. The reason for using wafer CSP technology is that peripherally designed die can be transformed into a standard bump or ball footprint that is compatible with current PCB layout rules, device test practice, and assembly practice. On the other hand, a flip-chip device tends to have a bump layout that is designed to maximize utilization of silicon and electrical integrity, with assembly and test being secondary issues.
In practice today, wafer CSPs tend to have ball pitches of 0.5mm, about the minimum that the printed circuit industry and current test/assembly practice can support. Flip-chip die typically have pitches of about half this value at 0.25mm.
This current wafer CSP pitch limitation of 0.5mm means that wafer CSPs tend to be limited to low leadcount devices (less than 30 I/O) or larger area die with medium leadcounts (memory). Flip-chip devices can have leadcounts of several thousand I/O. In the long run the distinction between flip-chip and wafer CSP will no longer be discernable as pitches well below 0.5mm will be able to be supported by the board fabricators, the test community, and the assembly community.
Integrated Passives
One very important application for wafer CSPs is integrated passives. Prismark predicts that this will in fact be the major wafer CSP application in terms of die count. "Die" is a somewhat euphemistic description since the "die" in question may be a combination of diodes and capacitors on silicon, thin- film on glass, or thin-film on silicon. However, each is recognizable as a flip-chip-type device even if the "wafer" is a 200mm x 300mm sheet of glass.
The principal advantages of wafer CSP technology for passives are low cost and small physical footprint. There are many companies that are active in this area: Intarsia, Bourns, Murata, STMicro, International Rectifier, and California Micro Devices. Flip Chip Technologies (FCT) actively supports several of these companies with bumping services.
Memory
A great deal of energy has been devoted to wafer CSP approaches for memory. For fast memory, wafer CSP is potentially an ideal application. Electrical performance (mutual inductance and capacitance) has become critical with double data rate (DDR) architectures favoring direct access to the center of the die via bumps. The die are large enough to accommodate the number of I/O at a reasonable pitch on a standard layout so that memory from multiple sources can be interchanged without a board redesign. Most fast SRAM devices today are already in flip-chip form, but within a BGA. The wafer CSP potentially eliminates the cost and electrical limitation of this flip-chip package. At issue is the reliability of the relatively small solder balls between the silicon and the PCB.
One approach developed by FormFactor is called MOST (MicroSpring On Silicon Technology). The MicroSprings are formed on the die while still in wafer form and serve double duty as test access points to the die as well as compliant standoffs that can be soldered to the board. Whether this approach is favored over the many others being considered for fast memory packaging remains to be seen. However, both Hyundai Electronics Industries Co. Ltd. in Korea and Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany, have licensed this technology for their DDR memory die.
One proven technology that addresses the reliability of large memory devices is the post technology that provides some level of standoff and strain relief between the die and the substrate, rather like IBM Corp.'s column grid arrays on a smaller scale. Fujitsu Ltd. has been the principal proponent of this approach and Casio Inc.'s Wrist Watch Camera uses this technology in production.
Lower Leadcount Devices
Wafer CSP technology is particularly suited to low leadcount devices of less than 30 I/O. These include microcontrollers, temperature sensors, A to D converters, regulators, op amps, reference die, small digital signal processors, and very small memory devices.
| ||
| Two of STMicro's wafer-scale CSPs as seen in the Ericsson A2618 dual-band GSM phone. The die measure approximately 2mm x 2mm and 2mm x 3mm. |
Power semiconductor companies have been looking for such a technology to enable them to improve/lower the on-resistance as well as improve thermal management capabilities. Several examples of power devices and their wafer scale technologies follow:
South Portland, Maine-based Fairchild Semiconductor's MOSFET BGA is targeted at applications such as synchronous rectification DC/DC converters and solenoid drives.
Maxim Integrated Products, Sunnyvale, Calif., is now shipping a number of high frequency power amplifiers using ultra-CSP package technology from FCT.
Geneva-based ST Microelectronics is now in production of an integrated 10-line low pass filter that is packaged in a wafer-level package. It has the equivalent of 50 discrete components in addition to active circuitry to provide low pass filtering with highly efficient ESD protection.
ON Semiconductor, Phoenix, is now offering a series of voltage regulators, lamp drivers, ignition coil drivers, and several other devices for automotive applications in solder bumped flip-chip format.
|
El Segundo, Calif.-based International Rectifier (IR) has worked with IC Interconnect to develop a wafer-level packaging technology that uses an electroless nickel/immersion gold UBM and solder bumps at 0.8mm pitch. IR has introduced two new HEXFETpower MOSFETs into its proprietary packages, aptly called FlipFET.
In total, about 25 wafer CSP configurations have been developed. In addition to those mentioned we should also note Tessera's WAVE, Seiko Epson's wire type, and Unitive's WS-CSP. Inevitably only a few configurations will become standardized and deliver the required reliability at the lowest cost. There may well be different approaches for small die vs. large die and the specter of rapid developments in molded underfills may also impact the wafer CSP finalists.
![]() |



















