Design Idea

LED drivers minimize power dissipation

Reference source and pullup resistor improve efficiency.

Fons Janssen, Maxim Integrated Products Inc, Bilthoven, Netherlands; Edited by Brad Thompson and Fran Granville -- EDN, 2/1/2007

One option for driving high-brightness LEDs uses the standard stepdown buck converter (Figure 1). The sense resistor, RS, generates a feedback voltage, VFB, that sets the desired LED current, ILED, according to the equation RS=VFB/ILED. Unfortunately, most buck converters require a relatively high feedback voltage on the order of 1V, which dissipates high power in the sense resistor (PSENSE=VFB/ILED). Reducing the sense resistor’s value and adding an op amp to boost the sensed voltage reduces the power penalty (Figure 2). In some cases, you can eliminate the op amp by using a stable reference voltage, which is available on some converter ICs, to pull up the sense voltage (Figure 3). The switching converter, a Maxim MAX1951, requires a feedback voltage of 800 mV and provides a 2V reference voltage at the reference pin. Connecting R1, a 50-kΩ resistor, between RS and VFB, and R2, a 100-kΩ resistor, between the reference and the feedback pins shifts the operating point from 200 mV at RS to 800 mV at the feedback pin:

Thus, for VSENSE=0.2V, V=0.8V. For the cost of two inexpensive resistors, power dissipation in the sense resistor diminishes by a factor of four.

Using the Luxeon K2 LED from Lumileds, power measurements on the circuits of figure 1 and  figure 3  illustrate how the feedback adjustment influences power that the LED driver delivers. Two graphs illustrate LED currents and voltages as a function of input voltage for a half-load of 400 mA (Figure 4) and a full load of 800 mA (Figure 5). As you would expect, the current regulation deteriorates at half-load. The variation of LED current averages approximately 5 mA over an input-voltage range of 4 to 5.5V and 1 mA for the circuit with normal feedback. The input-voltage range, however, increases by more than 0.5V. Regulation also deteriorates for full load, and the variation increases to approximately 22 mA versus 6 mA for the circuit with normal feedback (Figure 6). Again, the adjusted-feedback circuit of Figure 3 increases the input-voltage range.

You can define the improvement in efficiency, η, as follows:

The buck converter’s power-conversion efficiency and power dissipated in the sense resistor determine the circuit’s efficiency. As Figure 5 shows, the adjusted feedback of Figure 3 increases the efficiency more than 10% at either half-load or full load. Assuming that the sense voltage doesn’t change, efficiency improves for lower output-current loads because the sense resistor dissipates less power.



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Feedback Loop


Post a CommentPost a Comment

There are no comments posted for this article.

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no additional articles written by this author.


ADVERTISEMENT

Knowledge Center





Technology Quick Links

EDN Marketplace


©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.