Zibb

Margery Conner Technical Editor Margery Conner's PowerSource streams the latest developments in electronic power design and related technologies. Follow Margery on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/margeryc.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Power Management Articles

Blog

Thursday, June 14, 2007

20 years later, we still have 40 years of oil left

Jun 14 2007 8:40AM | Permalink |Comments (23) |


BP Statistical Review of World Energy released a report that estimated there are enough world petroleum reserves to last for 40 years, assuming we consume at our current rates. The article notes that in the 1980’s the amount of proven reserves was also 40 years. 20 years go by, consumption rates change, new customers change, new oil fields are found, old ones produce more, and voila, is we’re good to go for another 40 years of oil.

Pssh. So many things will change in the next 40 years – non-petroleum-powered cars, government regulations on green-house gas, etc – that trying to predict that far out is mostly useless. But the exercise itself is worthwhile because of all the key points it brings out. Such as:

--Two-thirds of oil reserves are in the Middle East.

--The fossil fuel that’s seen the fastest increase in consumption is coal, because that’s the kind of power stations that are being built in China. And yes, burning coal creates more grenn-house emissions than any other form of energy.

--The world's proven reserves of natural gas rose slightly, and are enough to provide more than 60 years of current consumption.

--There is a theory held by some economist that oil is already at its peak. Not so, says BP. "We don't believe there is an absolute resource constraint. When peak oil comes, it is just as likely to come from consumption peaking, perhaps because of climate change policies or for some other reason, as from production peaking."


Related entries in: Power Sources/Controllers | 


Reader Comments



at 6/14/2007 12:39:13 PM, Kevin Szabo said:
What this means is that we have been lucky. And this is why we haven''t seen the price pain and political repercussions that will occur when there is a real shortage.

We have two choices from here. Continue to rely on miracles (being lucky), or better, plan for the worst and hope for the best. Oil is such a useful compound that it really is a sin to just burn it. A next-generation energy research fund, generated via a carbon tax, is one of a multitude of forward-looking solutions to the guaranteed shortage in the future. Every farmer has to keep some of their harvest to plant the crop next year



at 6/14/2007 12:41:03 PM, Kevin Szabo said:
<Blog system truncated my comment for some reason. Here is the last sentence> Every farmer has to keep some of their harvest to plant the crop next year; it is time we do the same with energy.



at 6/14/2007 12:49:08 PM, Ron Minemier said:
Fossile Fuel...just the name should suggest what humans in the 21st century should be leaving behind.



at 6/14/2007 1:24:16 PM, Jonathan Williams said:
A carbon tax !?!? Sends shivers down my spine. The government always does a better job than a free market economy, right? The farmer keeps the best part of the crop as seed for next year because it's his/her best chance for economic success. Putting the government in charge of something like next-generation energy research funds is a license for cronyism, waste, mismanagement, pork-barrel spending, and entrenched bureaucracy. The government is not tasked by the Constitution to provide energy sources or any other solution to a business problem. Businesses do that and they are ones to invest seed money to ensure their own profitability out into the future.



at 6/15/2007 1:32:17 AM, Zoltan said:
Peak Oil is not a theory of economists, but of geologists and reservoir engineers. Their argument is not really based on the size of proven reserves, the key factor is if new drilling can keep up with decline of supergiant fields.



at 6/15/2007 2:43:59 PM, G. R. L. Cowan, former hydrogen-energy f said:
A fossil carbon tax is a fossil carbon <em>profit</em>. A "next-generation energy research fund" that depends on C tax revenues is rewarded for failure.

Researchers who were funded in proportion to how far the total fossil-C tax revenue <em>fell short of</em> its value this year would be rewarded for success.



at 6/17/2007 5:02:12 PM, Kim Berry said:
I probably cannot post URLs, so:

1) Google "peak oil"
2) Select the first link for "wikipedia"
3) scroll to the graphic in the section "Implications of an unmitigated world peak"

NOTE that virtually all projections are production peak around 2006-2011. If this article refutes all of these projections it should cite a reference. Having 40 years reserve in the ground does not mean 40 years of no problem: If production starts falling at 3% per year while demand increases at 3% per year, in just 5 years we could have chaos, irrespective of 35 years reserves still in the ground.





at 6/18/2007 1:29:26 PM, Jay Orbon said:
I love Kevin's input. We should not be burning oil. We will eventaully need it for other things.



at 6/19/2007 1:19:40 PM, TOY JONES said:
OIL IS NOT A FOSSIL FUEL, SOMETHING IN THE EARTH IS PRODUCING OIL, BACTERIA MAYBE?
NO DINOSAURS DIE 5 TO 10 MILES DOWN.



at 6/19/2007 1:31:14 PM, Robert Kier said:
I don''t like Kevin''s input. I think burning oil is better than burning corn. Plastics and other useful products from oil can be obtained from vegetation in the future. The only practical method of apportioning oil and other resources is by price in a market. The problem with green energy is that it is too expensive. The "problem" with fossil fuels is that they are still too cheap. When that changes, then great. Until then we should be glad for the abundunce of fossil fuels.



at 6/19/2007 1:42:57 PM, Greg Eaton said:
I like the fact that this subject is debated and that there are diverse opinions - fresh and healthy debate - but please look at the total picture - gas burnt at the power station is cleaner than coal but gas at the well head is not the same "clean" animal that we burn at that same power station, neither is the oil at the well head as clean as we like to think. Please compare apples with apples



at 6/19/2007 1:49:01 PM, Greg Eaton said:
P.S. We also have over 200 years of coal left and actually have real proven clean coal technology but everyone is on the R&D bandwagon getting paid for more research. And my experience in life is that if it does not cost money it is not respected and that goes for the environment as much as anything else. Carbon tax is insidious as it provides more feeding ground fro the greedy but it does put a value on the environment.



at 6/19/2007 7:37:14 PM, GallopingTide said:
The point is that the despotic empires of the middle east driven by their crusades of rage and dominated by a religion of death and destruction, hold the rest of the world hostage - this is, and will be tatamount to convert or die in the near future. The real reason to find an alternative to oil is in that fact. If you don't want your children on prayer mats down at your local school and your girls in hijabs in 20 years then get off your lazy butts and figure out how to get rid of the stranglehold that you've put yourselves into by relying on cheap energy.



at 6/20/2007 1:18:19 AM, Diana Lupascu said:
Hello to everyone,
Other 40 year resources are nothing, when we think at our children and at their children’s. 40 years resources still available 20 years ago, it was a mistake, 40 years from now on it could be a mistake also. My only hope is that beside any other oil or coal resources, I’m just preoccupied of what I can do, because unfortunately I can not count on Industry where all are interested on market share and so on and I could not count so much on Government that is to BIG to move and save this PLANET!

SWICH OFF THE LIGHT WHEN YOU DON’T NEED IT!
Bye and hear you in 2047.




at 6/27/2007 9:30:31 AM, Claude from UpNorth said:
In response to GallopingTide, and speaking of death and destruction, are you aware that the United States has been involved militarily in 44 countries since WW2, overthrown democratically elected leaders (Guatemala, Chile, Iran), supported brutal dictatorships (Indonesia, Chile, Iran, Iraq, Argentina, Phillipines, etc), holds the worlds largest arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, continues to create new WMDs, and has not contributed to world peace in the least bit. It's not them that are the problem, it's our large multinational companies who want to get natural resources for free from third world countries. Most people in this world want fairness and equality; you need to travel the world and see this for yourself buddy.



at 7/3/2007 9:41:12 AM, Norm said:
Response to Toy (and anyone else who holds this misconception):

Oil and other fossil fuels are not the result of dead dinosaurs. They are the remains of plants and microorganisms that underwent a chemical change brought about by heat and pressure and time. Most fossil fuels had already formed by the time the dinosaurs came on the scene.



at 10/19/2007 5:26:11 AM, Pete said:
Coal and oil are cheap! Alternative sources will predominate when their costs(financial and ergonomic) become lower. The answer of course is to tax the carbon, not as a source of funds for any purpose but for the disincentive of continuing our carbon based economy.

PBMRs from Westinghouse (Toshiba) furnish cheap, distributed electical power. Yes, they can be in my backyard. Much better than an oil refinery.



at 11/2/2007 9:25:33 AM, dude said:
> 20 years later, we still have
> 40 years of oil left
And damn global warming.We have to stop all this madness BEFORE climat changes will do this in "natural" manner by eliminating all us.



at 11/27/2007 2:22:43 PM, Victor said:
The Reserves were brought here by comets, meteors and other planets colliding with ours.



at 12/27/2007 2:01:30 PM, Ron in Los Gatos said:
A farmer doesn't keep part of his crop as seed for next year. He knows the advantage of buying "new" seed from the seed companies.



at 1/22/2008 5:13:05 PM, Meredith Poor said:
I can make long chain hydrocarbons by exposing methane to 'vacuum uv', in other words UV below 200 nm, and more particularly, at 121.6nm. I can get methane from decaying plant matter. I can also make it through the 'Bosch Process', which is to combine hydrogen and CO2 at 500 degrees C at 10 atmospheres in a nickle/tin catylst. Given these two processes, I can start with CO2 and Water and end up with any motor fuel you care to name. This being the case, we will never run out of oil, although only rich people may be able to afford it.



at 7/9/2008 7:37:21 AM, sp said:
what I see as the true concern is that the current apathy of the populace allows politicians to pander rather than helping everyone realize that oil is not renewable and will eventually not be a viable source of energy. rather than waiting for catastrophy, dramatic declines in our standard of living and possible economic collapse, we need to sacrifice now to preserve our standard of living for our children and ourselves. I believe the current run up in prices, inflation and economic slowdown are just a warning of things to come if we don''t focus and break the addiction. it''s not a matter of if, but when and how bad will it be. I see no problem with imposing taxes on consumption and using those taxes for research into alternative energy. what we need is our generations version of the manhattan project but for energy. the manhattan project was the largest research and development investment in the history of mankind and it drew us out of great peril. well today we face peril albeit from an enemy we can''t see or predict when it will arrive, but it is coming. it''s foolish to think market forces will work this out. they will choose profit until we face near collapse and then the government will have to step in anyway, just like what is happening with the credit crisis now. only the repurcusions won''t be lost retirement funds they will be war and starvation as we fight for access to the energy we need to survive...



at 8/30/2009 9:19:19 PM, Michael Dick said:
Oil is Satans vomit, making our air dirty and cars too big. Sell your hydrocarbons and get my supper

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites