Margery Conner Technical Editor Margery Conner's PowerSource streams the latest developments in electronic power design and related technologies.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Power Management Articles

Blog

Friday, December 21, 2007

Silicon nano research for lithium-ion batteries commercialized within five years?

Dec 21 2007 11:52AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (6) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


In general, you have two options with lithium ion battery technology. You can optimize the battery chemistry for high-energy storage in the kind of batteries you’ll find in today’s laptops and cell phones. These li-ion cells rely on cobalt cathodes which have an unfortunate although rarely experienced ability to go into a thermal runaway condition and catch fire. Or, you can optimize for power – that is, the ability to charge and discharge rapidly. These are the batteries that GM is pursuing for its extended-range electric car, the Chevy Volt, which uses lithium ion iron phosphate batteries from companies like A123 and LG Chem. It’s almost impossible to get an lithium iron phosphate  battery to go into thermal runaway, but at the trade-off of much lower energy storage. [Update: Thanks to the alert reader who corrected me -  LG Chem uses a mangaese-based cathode.]

This past week, Yi Cui, assistant professor of materials science and engineering at Stanford, announced success in expanding the energy storage capacity of lithium ion batteries by using silicon nanowires for the anode, which in current batteries are typically made of carbon. Silicon’s advantage over carbon is that it has a much higher energy capacity. However, silicon's drawback has been that as it absorbs positively charged lithium atoms during charging, it swells and then shrinks during discharge, resulting in cracks. Cui’s research shows that while the silicon nanowires still expand and contract, they don’t fracture. Use of silicon nanowires results in a 10x increase in energy storage, with the potential to last for over 1,000 cycles. (Actually laboratory cycles are currently in the tens, rather than thousands of cycles.)

There’s an excellent interview with Cui on the GM-Volt.com site that asks him if his research could transfer over to the lithium iron phosphate battery chemistry used by A123 and LG Chem. Cui says that combining a current battery’s cathode materials with a silicon nanowire anode will significantly improve the performance. Cui says in the interview that he thinks the technology could be commercialized within five years.


Related entries in: Automotive | Battery Power | Power Sources/Controllers | 


Reader Comments


at 12/21/2007 2:01:44 PM, kent beuchert said:
Cui doesn't have to achieve anywhere near 1000 rcharge cycle lifespans for automotive applications - with his batteries providing the Tesla with the equivalent of 2500 miles on a single charge, it's obvious that a 100 recharge cycle lifespan would provide 250,000 miles, or more than would be needed.

at 12/26/2007 6:50:25 PM, Meredith Poor said:
If the batteries are cheap, who cares whether they last 1000 cycles? One uses gasoline exactly once before its gone. Supposedly it woulc cost $30,000 to equip a car with current LiON batteries. 10x energy density might result in .1x cost. At $3 per gallon and 25 mpg, 15,000 miles per year costs $1800. If the batteries lasted two years the car owner would break even.

at 1/5/2008 9:09:29 AM, MasonMcD said:
"10x energy density might result in .1x cost. At $3 per gallon and 25 mpg, 15,000 miles per year costs $1800. If the batteries lasted two years the car owner would break even. " ______________________ And that''s before taking into account improved efficiencies due to fewer batteries=less weight=improved mileage.

at 1/5/2008 9:50:07 PM, captainAl said:
Yes, but the batteries arent gas. Rather a gas tank. You still have to buy the electricity that you put in them...

at 1/16/2008 11:44:39 AM, Meredith Poor said:
"You still have to buy the electricity that you put in them..." 40 miles x 365 days = roughly 14,400 miles, say 15,000 to round it out. 40 miles / 20 MPG = 2 gallons x $3 is $6 per day. 12Kwh at 10 cents per KWh = $1.20. $900 per year for batteries plus $450 per year for electricity is $1350. 365 x $6 = $2100. 12Kwh might be be an underestimate, but not by much. Certainly not by the $800 or so difference between electricity and gasoline.

at 3/30/2008 10:36:27 PM, lemmonhead said:
what is the pollution cost of a gallon of gasoline verses the equivalent of electricity. How much do our Oil wars cost.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.