Margery Conner Technical Editor Margery Conner's PowerSource streams the latest developments in electronic power design and related technologies.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Power Management Articles

Blog

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Tire pressure monitoring systems sip power for 10 years from one small battery

Sep 2 2008 3:56PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (31) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


I had a conversation with Jim Grothe, strategic marketing and business development for MEMs at Freescale, about power management for tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS). These are the pressure sensor systems made up of a MEMs pressure sensor and an RF transmitter that goes on the wheel, and an RF receiver and processor that reside on the car frame/body and communicate the tire pressure information to the system processor. TPMS is a prime example of how car sybsystems are under very tight power constraints as electronics proliferate under the hood. Grothe emphasized, “Power is THE driving requirement, second only to the accuracy of the pressure sensor itself.”

Power parasitesUnlike most the rest of a car’s electronics that can use power from the main electrical system, the power for the tire-side sensor electronics comes from its own small battery, which has to last for at least 10 years without being replaced. That’s a painfully tight budget. I asked about energy harvesting systems that transform a small amount of the tire’s mechanical energy to electrical energy. Grothe said Freescale, along with several other companies is working on it, but energy harvesting isn’t practical for at least the near future for the automotive environment.

Another example of how power miserliness drives the TPMS architecture is that Freescale uses capacitive sensing rather than piezoresistive technologies (PRT) for the tire pressure transducer. Capacitive sensing is a low-power technique because you’re not generating a current to sense the voltage across the transducer. While a PRT transducer doesn’t require a lot of current, every little bit counts when you’re looking at ten years from a tiny battery.


Related entries in: Automotive | Power Sources/Controllers | 


Reader Comments


at 9/3/2008 7:01:59 AM, ANDE MURALI said:
ANDE MURALI

at 9/3/2008 1:38:15 PM, Sumarian said:
Finally, another way to add $500 per tire to a 300Hp city car. YEAH!

at 9/3/2008 1:39:49 PM, Plexus said:
Why the mandate for the battery to last 10 years? Average tires only last up to 3-4 years, perhaps less especially as aggressive as people drive. If it's a standard cell, it could be replaced when tires are replaced.

at 9/3/2008 2:09:28 PM, Larry M said:
How about a piezo-electric generator mounted on the tire inside wall, coupled to a supercap? When tires are replaced, just unfasten the generator and attach it to the new tire with rubber cement.

at 9/3/2008 2:48:23 PM, Jarl Johnson said:
For the average car, to Hell with the pressure. It is stupid drivers that we are trying to wake up. Is not the real problem to predict blowouts from underinflation/high temperature. Well predict it by some form of tire de-lamination strip that will shake the car or bang on the wheelwell. Big rigs already measure pressure and that is fine for buses trucks and SUVs. Jarl Johnson

at 9/3/2008 4:59:55 PM, Fred S said:
A friend with new high end car had very annoying problems with tire pressure sensors. False triggering generated error messages that basically lock up the rest of on-board displays, and can't simply be ignored. Multiple trips to the dealer before fixed. Just another dumb and expensive idea.

at 9/4/2008 1:22:56 AM, Jyri Poldre said:
Why not RFID tag with pressure sensor inside tire? Does rotation confuse communication?

at 9/4/2008 1:30:45 AM, Scunnerous said:
When it comes time to change tires, I go to a good shop which hand tightens lug nuts and gets the balancing right, so they are very good relative to most. Even so, I just don't see the kind of people doing that job being able to deal with TPMS sensors; I mean not damaging what's there or replacing when necessary. This is a nightmare in the making.

at 9/4/2008 5:10:14 AM, Plexus said:
This is just another example of technology replacing the responsibility and common sense of human beings. This is yet another gadget to drive costs up because people are too ignorant to do simple maintenance of the vehicles they drive. What happened to the days when you could just buy a car without all the garbage?

at 9/4/2008 5:55:11 AM, Dev said:
Auto industry has to give some work to their R&D staff as they do not want to work on improving the MPG. Did you all noticed a jump in the milage for some cars in few months? Technology is there but industry does not have desire to introduce it so they are toying with these kids stuff.

at 9/4/2008 7:16:30 AM, justme said:
To all the posters who are blaming the auto companies and theeir engineers for this - TPMS is a government mandate requiring systems on vehicles weighing less than 10,000 lbs. The feds in turn were responding to poor maintenance practices in general and an issue of one specific tire on one specific vehicle.

at 9/4/2008 9:03:11 AM, Plexus said:
Ok, so our federal government is forcing the technology to replace the responsibility and common sense of human beings. Either way, resources are wasted. I applaud the engineers for creating new ideas and new technology, but let's look at the big picture. At what point does technology become a thorn instead of a luxury? As far as the feds responding to a specific problem, perhaps Ford should not have mandated that the Firestone tires be used below the recommended pressure, and then blame Firestone when a problem occurred.

at 9/4/2008 9:53:23 AM, justme said:
It was not my intention to defend the government, Ford or Firestone, only to explain how we came to have TPMS. I share frustration over having to compensate with my money for the shortcomings of others.

at 9/5/2008 6:57:15 AM, commonSense said:
Everyone who's responded is correct that it should be up to the driver to maintain their car. The question is whether everyone checks the tire pressure daily, adjusts that pressure for road conditions and the list goes on as far as maintenance. Having worked directly with multiple TPMS vendors in testing technology, in very short order prices will come down and power generation will be wheel based. Energy harvesting using rotation is already in the works. Just to clarify a previous comment, wheels last 10 years and tires last 3-4, therefore the power requirement time period.

at 9/5/2008 12:08:21 PM, Plexus said:
Agreed, wheels last 10 years. Whether a cell is placed on the tire or wheel, it has the potential to be serviced every 3-4 years instead of 10. It's understood that costs will decrease substaintially, but as "justme" stated: "I share frustration over having to compensate with my money for the shortcomings of others." I check my tire pressure and I don't care for additional cost of my vehicles. While this technology may represent a small cost increase, it's more and more of these "technology wonders" that are added that suddenly create a $25,000 price tag on a vehicle when it should cost $11,000. The same people that this technology is designed for are the same people that choose to ignore their "low oil" idiot light.

at 9/5/2008 4:29:34 PM, Jonathan said:
I have a 2007 model Infiniti with TPMS, and it has already saved me once when I got a nail in the tire. Since the tires are low profile they do not look deformed even when significantly low in pressure. I'm quite proactive about monitoring my car's vital signs, but I wouldnt' have known I had picked up a nail until my tire was shredding on the highway, other than through TPMS. So, the system saved me not only the difference between the cost of a tire and the cost of a patch, but also the grief of having to deal with a defunct tire on the side of the road. I don't think this is wasteful technology.

at 9/8/2008 4:49:55 AM, Dave said:
Those who have no problem with the purchase/lease price of an Infiniti probably wouldn't mind the additional cost of this questionable luxury.

at 9/11/2008 1:40:19 PM, Eric said:
I have a 1999 Oldsmobile Alero that monitors the tire pressure by comparing the rotation speed of the wheels. Much simpler and works great but the law doesn''t allow that kind of sensor. I have my tires changed between winter and summer tires twice a year so I have to reset the monitor after every tire change. A minor inconvenience but I think worth the effort. My understanding is that these new sensors have to be recalibrated with special tools whenever the tires are changed. Sounds like a major headache to me.

at 9/11/2008 2:10:59 PM, Tribble said:
I guess it's like not checking the oil until the oil pressure light comes on, or the newer "Change Oil" light comes on. I suppose that darned ugly little "Change Oil Before..." sticker messing up the windshield is just too much for some. I will just keep driving my 61' Olds 98. I don't even have to worry about seatbelts or disk brakes. :)

at 9/12/2008 1:52:01 AM, bellaire.co.uk said:
Do you need another sensor? With abs braking isn't car wheel speed available. Thus it should be possible to average the speed of revolution on a rolling average algorithm and compare it with historic information in order to detect deflation which cause the speed of rotation to vary (using existing hardware). Catastrophic deflation is unlikely to be detected by pressure or this system!

at 9/12/2008 1:13:23 PM, Cobalt said:
It seems many people are living in the low tech past. Just bought an American car, under $15,000, that has four wheel tire pressure sensors that report pressure accurately, independant of motion, and in a user friendly way that does not upset the rest of the vehicle systems if it does report low pressure. Two reasons for reporting is the possibility of tire/vehicle damage due to low pressure and the fact of better mileage with proper inflation. Wake up folks- - It does not take a Lexus or Infinity and it does not need to be intrusive, only a welcome addition.

at 9/16/2008 1:22:13 PM, suzieq said:
Not to mention that even though I receive free tire rotation for life, I have to pay $45 to have the service department reset my tire pressure monitors...make sure the front left really isn't the rear right!

at 9/16/2008 1:29:55 PM, Chris PE said:
I really have no criticism here.We are all different and enjoy different thigs.Years ago my son gave me a digital tire pressure tester and when I vacuum my car before a car wash , I just check tire pressure.Let's say that your sensor showed low tire pressure....most of the time(except a very few cars) you have to pull into a gas station and pump it up.I agree that it is a luxury , but maybe only a partial one. Interesting about battery :o) Nice article .Thank you.

at 9/16/2008 1:38:56 PM, harley Charlie said:
What about Mexican trucks, will they be required to install TPMs? Did FEMA and Michael "the cadaver" with his-shirt-off, A.K.A. Chertof, the foreign citizen approve of this?

at 9/16/2008 1:42:31 PM, Lawrence Newton Jr. said:
With the varied forms and sheer magnitude of the energy that flows through the wheel assembly, I would be concerned over the limited innovation demonstrated by the concern over power requirements for any device located within the wheels. The simple self winding watch on my dresser or the no battery flashlight (just shake and illuminate it) that my daughter bought for me are simple but effective energy extractors as are thermoelectric generators. Shoot, while your at it, why don''t you have the systems increase the tire pressures when needed as well?

at 9/16/2008 1:53:39 PM, deflated said:
But you guys don't understand! It's part of Obama's energy conservation program! Sorry, but couldn't resist.

at 9/16/2008 2:51:25 PM, Godzilla2k69 said:
My son and I mad a GIANT air pressure gauge to protest Obama when he was here in Elkhart, IN. We even made the local evening news. This will save us so much gas we are going to have to stop every 50 miles and siphon out the extra gas so it doesn't spill on the ground.

at 9/16/2008 7:56:40 PM, BradStew said:
First a few facts. 1. TPMS resides in the valve stem. Good for new tires. No need to replace the sensors. Also, Freescale TPMS have sensors that tell rotation and what side it''''s on. 2. ABS sensors cannot determine low pressure unless it''''s very low. TPMS will tell you if you are low by 5 psi. Saves gas and tire wear and pay for themselves rather quickly. 3. Cost is minimal. Adds less than $40 to the cost of the automobile. 4. Filling my tires at a gas station used to be free. No more. So I can quickly check at home and fill if needed. 5. It''''s not Obama''''s fault. He represents socially responsible adults who ought to worry about maximizing fuel mileage for our environment and national security. It''''s patriotic.

at 9/16/2008 8:50:05 PM, robocat said:
US oil usage per Day ~ 5,102,000 Barrels @ $125/Barrel 3 % Savings = 153,060 Barrels a day @ $125 =$19,132,500 daily,= $6,983,362,500 yearly evidently that is insignificant money to some folks, “Its real money to me” Taking it one step further US Government Budget for 2007 $2,700,000,000,000, taking 3% off the top yields us $81,000,000,000 in savings, and average of $270 for every man women and Child in American. Evidently some folks like paying extra Taxes and don't much care about fuel economy:3% is real money. You can lead a man to knowledge but you can't make him think!

at 9/17/2008 2:20:40 PM, Rick K said:
Amazing invention... How did our parents and grandparents manage to survive long enough to procreate us all without the aid of an integral tire pressure indicator? I'm kidding.

at 10/18/2008 1:54:33 PM, Ken Ball said:
Most of the readers here miss the point since this is an EDN article. Low-power design is not easy when new technologies constantly demand more power. However, industrial sensors running off a battery for ten years are common place, but typically do not use a processor. Instead they will use digital/analogue circuitry in an ASIC on 1um or thereabouts technology - with very low leakage. One example is the Micordul Mixed Signal Gate Array ASIC which would actually suit this type of application very well.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.