Zibb

Mike SantariniEDN Senior Editor Mike Santarini covers digital design and the EDA, ASIC, and FPGA industries. [Editor's note: As of Feb. 2008, this blog is no longer active and is presented here for archival purposes.]



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

IC Design Articles

Blog

Monday, February 5, 2007

How long should a TV last?

Feb 5 2007 1:03PM | Permalink |Comments (50) |


How long should a TV last? In 2002, I was moving into a new apartment and was in the market for a TV. So I went to the local Costco and purchased a widescreen 46” Panasonic rear projection TV. In the giant Costco warehouse, the TV looked like a modest size, but when I got into my new apartment it was well mammothly large for the space. That said, the TV had a fairly sharp picture and had cool features like split screen, which allowed my kids to play video games on one half of the TV and freed up the other half to watch shows. It was a very cool TV…while it lasted.

Two weeks ago, I walked into the family room and noticed my 5-year old daughter sitting in front of the TV with 3D glasses. I thought to myself, wow, this is really cool, they are showing a show in 3D on PBS. I wondered how they could do that—did PBS assume every kid out there had 3D glasses, did they mail 3D glasses out as a promotion? I didn’t remember hearing anything about that from my kids and didn’t remember receiving it in the mail. It was about an hour later that, to my dismay, I discovered that every station was in 3D.

At first I hoped that someone in the house had accidentally worked their way through the many menu choices, messed with the green, red, blue convergence on the TV’s remote control. No such luck—something’s busted in the conversion circuitry so that the green projector is now stuck to the viewers' left--the TV’s busted (or maybe it is an evolutionary 3D’s a “feature” I didn’t see in the manual). Grrrr I had a mind to tear the TV down (or more likely have the technician do it), find the problem and then berate the engineers at Panasonic (or its suppliers) who made the defective part. Then I started shopping for repairman rates and adding the part costs reported by folks who reported on the Internet the same problem. Alas, it wasn’t looking cost-effective to repair.

Then at an editorial meeting a week or so ago, I was bemoaning my TV troubles to my fellow editors and I was a bit amazed that a few of them said “five years is a pretty good run for a TV.” I was a bit taken aback--five years is a good run for a TV? (I’m certainly glad I didn’t build an entertainment system around it).

Every product has a life expectancy and conspiracy theorists even hold that some companies design that into their products—built-in obsolesce. Of course in covering EDA and knowing the issues of debugging and verification, I know that just creating a design that works in silicon is a very difficult task. Then of course there are manufacturing/yield/test issues. But all these steps basically test that a chip works once it is designed, once it is manufactured and once it is packaged--then it gets shipped to the customer, who of course checks to see their systems work before shipping.

How do you test a product will work over time, how can you test how long it will work and how do you or should you convey that information to the consumer? I guess for a TV, it isn’t critical for a product to be tested for longevity, obviously for a pacemaker it is. I guess I’m a bit old fashioned and think something that has a lofty price tag, should indeed last—But I guess the question is for how long?


Related entries in: Business and Marketing | Components, Hardware, Interconnect | Digital ICs | Semiconductors | 


Reader Comments



at 2/5/2007 1:37:44 PM, Steve said:
I expect them to work at least 10 years. The two tube TVs I have all reached this milestone. They are still working great.



at 2/6/2007 1:23:10 PM, Jon said:
Sometimes too long? I want to upgrade to a big screen plasma but want to wait until my old tube unit fails, but it keeps plugging along. almost 10 years now with one early low budget trip to a repair shop for solder joint repairs.



at 2/6/2007 1:36:22 PM, Ted said:
Same as Jon......only my tube TV is 20 years old. Best picture in the house BTW.



at 2/6/2007 1:56:05 PM, Tom said:
My TV is the Sony video monitor I bought for my Commodore Amiga in 1986. The Amiga is long gone, but the Sony still works great.



at 2/6/2007 2:59:59 PM, Darryn said:
There is no reason why any well designed electronic product shouldn't last at least 10 years. I have a Toshiba portable bought in 1986 which is still going well, about to replace its speaker, the first repair in its life. Unfortunately while the world is gripped by this "economies of scale, shove as many out the door as possible" mentality, this problem will only get worse. Since our government introduced GST to Australia, this has caused major damage to our service industry, so most people simply "toss it and get a new one".



at 2/6/2007 3:25:42 PM, Ray said:
Interesting you should mention pacemakers and planned obsolesence. I worked for Intermedics before Guidant bought them and shut them down. We planned for battery depletion to be the "failure" mode. There was a fine balance between long life and having features so old that you really wanted an upgrade. 5 years was about the norm for mostpacemakers.

In TV's, my grandparents got one of the first RCA TV's in '54. I was still using it in my bedroom when in college in 1974. It was retired because we just couldn't enough red any more. It didn't really die but literally faded away. Most of my TV's since have died around 10 years. I wish our 10 year old Sony 36 incher would die so I could justify getting a 42 inch plasma or LCD.

Given the advances in technology, every 5 to 7 years and you really want to upgrade anyway. If having shorter life meant lower cost, I would be OK with the shorter life. The big question is when will we come up with something bigger than 1080p? Looks like that is the end of the line for the forseeable future.



at 2/6/2007 3:38:10 PM, Kat said:
A TV should last at least 10 years. My current tube is over 15. The only problem I've had with it was a channel was looked out without the person who did it remembering what code they used.



at 2/6/2007 5:25:05 PM, CrankyGary said:
I have a 28" Mitsubishi (CRT) TV that I got in early 1988.
It's still running fine. I thank the gods that Intel & Microsoft haven't embedded
"media focused processors" into TVs yet - otherwise your TV would probably have to be trashed after 4-6 years - you
know, not enough RAM, too slow CPU, no firmware upgrade path...




at 2/6/2007 8:48:57 PM, John said:
I say price versus life. I purchased a top of the line 25" Sony Trinatron in 1982. It still is running although this past year has developed a thermal warm up short that affects the colors which requires a pat on the side for the first 5 minutes before it reaches operating temperature. Otherwise the sound and picture are great. I think a 10 yr waranty should be the goal.



at 2/7/2007 4:08:17 AM, Dennis said:
The manual tuners are what used to be the weak spot and they were replaced years ago with a solid state tuner. The electronics (silicon) should last many human lifetimes. I was involved for years in life and reliability testing and there are many ways to stress a device to see how long it will last. A company who wants to take the time can build a TV which will run for many years. A design flaw due to inadequate testing or a cheap implementation to "push out" more product at a lower price can kill reliability.
Planned obsolescence happens by introducing newer features year after year so that it's not too long before most will buy a new product merely to have these features. It really has nothing to do with design to wear-out or fail. It's too difficult to design a product which works, let alone try to design for certain time to fail. However, don't believe that manufacturers don't know what fails in their product if only because of the parts they sell. Ask any parts clerk at an auto dealership and they'll tell you which cars and what engines, trannys etc are their best and which to avoid. Ask an independent TV service / repair tech before you buy next time to see what they recommend. We've had to get rid of several perfectly good PC's because we needed to run newer programs which would require hardware upgrades which either weren't cost effective or maybe even possible!



at 2/7/2007 8:32:04 AM, PaulR said:
You have to look twice just to find a 1 year warranty on a TV, these days. Which is ridiculous! I have a couple early 1990's cheapy-o B&W TV's with the "continuous" manual tuners, (you know, the ones with an AM-FM radio built in - early 'junk' from C----) that have seen plenty use and are still going strong except for noisy volume controls I need to clean. But after reading this article, I guess I'd better quit telling people Panasonic was a good brand...
(Oh, that's right. My experience with Panasonic products goes back primarily to the '80's. The last (Panasonic) SVHS VCR I bought lasted only 2 years.)

I disagree slightly on the cars, though. If you REALLY want to know what cars hold up past the warranty, go talk to a good (reputation) independent auto shop (mechanic) whose been in business for at least 10 years. You can take J.D. Powers surveys, and other such nonsense, & throw it all in the trash!



at 2/7/2007 12:59:38 PM, Les said:
You ask "How do you test a product will work over time, how can you test how long it will work...?" Physics should tell the manufacturer the temperature acceleration factor - example 2x for every 10 degrees C. Then operate the device at 75degC, 100degC, and 125degC (etc). The manufacturer should see the expected accelerated failure rates. If they don't know the failure rate they didn't bother to test it.



at 2/7/2007 1:05:14 PM, LynnB said:
My opinion: anything for the home that costs more than $500 is to be considered capital equipment - and should have a lifetime of 10 yrs minimum. Problem with TVs in particular is that the broadcast medium is currently a moving target - migrating to HD - and its two current similar but different specs. The Netherlands just through the switch, and all terrestrial broadcasters must transmit in digital only - anlog tvs go out the window. The coming day for the USA (per the FCC) is drawing near in 2008. So there isn't a current need for a ten year life analog TV.



at 2/8/2007 9:44:52 AM, Michael Santarini said:
Great responses…from what I’m reading, it sounds like TVs should last for at least 10 years so that means my Panasonic died prematurely. I also found it interesting that a lot of you want your well-made but old TVs to die so you can buy a newer one (maybe there’s a market for something that helps you quietly fry your TV and justify buying a new one to your significant other). I have to admit, I was bummed but wasn’t in tears when the Panasonic died-- I actually went out a couple days ago and bought a Samsung 42” LCD TV to replace the Panasonic. So far, so good, the flat screen does save a lot of real-estate in the family room, though I have to say it comes with a hidden feature: the sleek shiny black frame seems to attract dust like an Ionic Breeze (that’s probably why Samsung includes dust cloth with it).

Oh also, I certainly don’t think Panasonic is a bad brand based on this one experience (I have a Panasonic radio that’s lasted for well over a decade). It may have just been this particular unit or maybe this particular model. That said, when I looked up the problem on the Internet, I did notice that a few other folks seemed to be describing the same convergence problem with this particular model. But like I said, the features on it were really cool. For more money, this Samsung doesn’t have nearly as a many features—but the picture is sharper and it looks cool (after a good dusting, anyway). Maybe when there isn’t anything on TV worth watching, I’ll bring the Ionic Breeze into the room and watch them battle it out.

Thanks for contributing.




at 2/13/2007 6:26:29 PM, Peter Bradshaw said:
I have a 10 in. Sony TV about 25 years old that works perfectly, and is as sharp as my eyes can use. Only the remote is lost, but luckily the VCR one works on the TV also. I will need to buy an HDTV tuner once the TV stations all become digital, but I expect it to work for many more years.



at 2/13/2007 6:28:01 PM, Peter Bradshaw said:
That was 19 inch, not 10 inch.



at 2/15/2007 1:11:50 PM, Russ said:
Forget about the tv, what about the remote? I would expect a tv to last at least 10 years but my remote is a bit of a problem. The piece that keeps the batteies in has broken and the function are all worn off. Unfortunely the universal won't help for a lot of the fubctions.



at 2/15/2007 2:52:34 PM, Steve R said:
10 years of life is my preference, considering the cost. I just gave away my first TV (I''m 44) because it was too big to take with me in my most recent move. It was a 19" Zenith, made in the mid-70''s, with a genuine wood cabinet. It still worked great, though the ''SpacePhone feature was obsolete (no cellular compatability...) That TV outlasted three remote controls.



at 3/5/2007 10:59:02 AM, Joe R said:
1987 Samsung 13" color TV (made in USA) still works great. 1996 RCA 27" color (made in Mexico) TV still works great.

Looking to add a third TV soon and will be going the HDTV route. Hope to get a high quality 30" CRT version for less than $700 and expect it to last 20 more years. Why waste money on a new TV every 5 years? Americans need to relearn frugality.

My father-in-law is perfectly happy with analog cable and old TV. He was happy when I told him that HD TV to analog converters are now only $70 and will probably be $30 in 2009 when everything goes digital.



at 3/19/2007 10:49:38 AM, Doug said:
Past experience leads me to expect 10 to 20 year life before I feel I should have to replace any television set that I purchase. This has been the case in the past for every set I have bought. I recently purchased a state-of-the-art Sony 50" projection HDTV and if it fails, other than a lamp replacemnt, before 217 I will be very upset.



at 3/20/2007 11:59:36 AM, ExSonyFan said:
There is no reason a TV cannot last 12-15 years. It is in a low vibration environment and can be made to run fairly cooly. The problem is nowdays, everyone is making a TV with the mindset of disposable PCs. All they are is data pumps with a monitor, make it as cheap as possible.

I have traditional stuck with Sony. We bought a Trinitron back in 72 or so that was still working when I saw it last in 1989.

However, the last Sony I purchased, a top of the line Sony tube TV crapped out after 3 only years.

The last remnant of Sony in my house is a 2 yr old DVD player that is already having fits. As another article said recently, Sony is no longer a premium brand.



at 4/17/2007 6:28:45 AM, Alex H said:
As has already been said, many TVs made 15+ years ago are still going strong. The recent developments in screen size, LCD, Plasma, high definition, digital inputs etc are making people change their TVs more often. Eventually things will settle down and people will want long life from their TVs again. Then the more reliable brands will sell and the less reliable ones won't. Also the WEEE (electronic waste) regulations, which will force manufacturers to pay for recycling, will give a big push in the direction of making electronics last longer.



at 4/27/2007 10:30:04 AM, ALin said:
We had the same problem with our tv which is now in the repair shop. The difference between the readers' responses and your experience is that your tv (and ours) are the new big picture ones. They put out more heat and use more electricity and cost lots of $ to repair.

Our bill would be $685 to fix the convergence. We have had this 60" rear projection tv for a little over 4 years. At what point is it even worth it to fix a tv like that? My husband would much rather buy a new one. Even the tv repair shop that called with the estimate a few minutes ago expects me not to have it repaired--they asked if I wanted it returned or if I wanted them to toss it--not if I wanted it repaired. The push is on to have tvs as disposable esp. with the big ticket ones. It is a whole new ballgame from the tvs that the others have commented about.



at 4/29/2007 2:17:18 PM, Emma said:
Well my Sony television is 6 years old and going strong, my no-name 13 inch television is 14 years and works perfectly. However, my 2 year old 30 inch television (which is a tube television) just bit the dust. I pretty much think any television made in the last 5 years or so has a very short shelf live. IMO, if I'm going to spend $400-600 on something it should last at least 10 years.



at 4/30/2007 8:43:16 AM, Frank said:
We have a 19in CRT & 13in CRT & VCR combo, both Magnavox made in USA in late 80s /early 90''''s & they''''re still running strong. In contrast, we''''ve bought 2 big-name-brand DVD players in last few years which crapped out after 1-2 years & had to be thrown away. With this experience, we will NEVER buy ''''new'''' entertainment electronics for more than $200-300 at most. It''''s ''''entertainment'''', not food, mortgage, gas, utilities, essentials, etc. If it''''s ''''entertainment'''' & not free or cheap, or guaranteed to last a loooooooooong time, we''''re not interested



at 5/1/2007 8:31:18 PM, DON said:
i have the same Panasonic tv you have and it had to be repaired 3 times within the first 6 months i owned it. all 3 times the repair guys would pick it up, kepp it for 3-4 weeks, bring it back, and the next day the same problem. now at 3 years the damn convergance on the blue is messed up. i will never buy a Panasonic product as long as i live. they are garbage.



at 5/2/2007 7:05:00 PM, Michael Santarini said:
Wow, this blog post has legs. Here’s a bit of an update. When last I commented on this post, I told folks I acquired a Samsung 40” LCD to replace my Panasonic. Well, right from the get go the ultra-thin, cool lookin TV had this weird sound problem. At a very normal volume level, the speakers would resonate/shake the frame of the TV so that the sound occasionally sounded like Charlie Brown’s teacher…wah wok wong. Anyways, I called Sears and they sent out a repairman. The end result, the repairman said he couldn’t do anything and suggested I either move the TV around the room on the chance that maybe there was some situational acoustic anomaly occurring. His other suggestion was that I buy a surround sound system for it….gaaaaa. Moving it around didn’t work so I forked out an extra $500 for a surround sound system. So a $1500 TV ended up being $2000. If and when you go flat screen, crank up those speakers before you buy...or buy a lot of egg cartons.



at 5/31/2007 2:10:57 PM, Mel said:
I gave away a 13" RCA B&W TV that was over 21 years old and still working. I am still using a great working 27" GE color TV that is over 18 years old. I never had problems with these CRT TVs. About a year ago I purchased a 46" Sharp Aquas LCD HDTV and I''''m very pleased with it. Regarding sound, most flat screen HDTVs seem to need an extra set of amplified speakers to sound decent. I had an old stereo system with an Aux input which worked fine to provide my HDTV with an extra sound boost at zero additional cost. I fully expect my Sharp HDTV to last 20 years, or I will be very disappointed. Projection HDTVs are less expensive than flat screen types, but, they have problems due to the relatively short-life of the projection bulbs.



at 6/24/2007 7:25:27 PM, steve said:
I have a Mitsubishi 26 inch CRT tv, purchased in 1989 for around $600 if memory serves, that is still going strong. One time I thought it was starting to go on the fritz, noticed a lot of color fringing, but it turns out the problem was loose connections caused by me turning the set 90 degrees so I could watch it from my desk. It's not HDTV but it looks pretty darn good to me.

If I ever need to replace it, I would not expect whatever comes next to last more than 5 years.



at 6/30/2007 8:35:21 AM, Carolyn said:
We have a 19 inch RCA color TV that we bought in 1997. Is still going strong (our fingers are crossed). Only thing is, we're not sure if we can plug a DVD player into it.



at 8/14/2007 6:31:15 PM, Nishant said:
Not to keep talking about TVs, but I have a Sharp 13in CRT TV built in 1986 that just clonked out on me. 21 years is a good run.



at 8/29/2007 3:01:07 AM, Noel said:
Just under four years ago, I purchased a Sharp Aquos 20" TV. It cost in the region of $2000. Two months ago it powered up to a blank screen and instantly powered off. Sharp are not interested, as it is out of warranty. Local service engineers I have called won't touch it. Spare parts to rectify the problem could cost anywhere between $600 and $1500, depending on the nature of the fault.

Mel, if you expect your Sharp TV to last beyond five years, you are engaging in wishful thinking. When the inverter board goes, or the cold-cathode lamp goes, expect to be told that you will need a new LCD unit - at a cost similar to that you originally paid for the TV.

Even so-called premium brands are churning out worthless, cheap junk these days, which is why I will NEVER AGAIN pay more for the false perception that I am buying quality when I buy Sony, Sharp or any one of the big names.

While environmentalists are happy to bleat on ad-nauseum about the scientifically dubious idea of man-made global warming, the deliberate and environmentally damaging wastefulness known as planned obsolescence goes on unchallenged.



at 9/9/2007 11:43:58 AM, Andy said:
We bought a rca 27 inch in 1991 works great still as of today, but the 32inch rca bought in 2003 just broke today, so i think they just made them better back in the day. PS every sony product i bought never lasted more than 2 years



at 10/15/2007 3:22:50 PM, Mark said:
I have a 26" Mitsubishi CRT that has a sticker on the back that says it was manufactured in January 1987. The TV still works great except that the tuner doesn''t receive many of the cable channels without a box. The sound controls for bass, treble etc. are also kinda dirty and need to be spun back and forth at times to remove noise. All in all, Im really pleased with the set (Model CS2642RA)...I highly doubt today''s junk would last like this thing has.



at 11/3/2007 4:29:24 PM, Dennis said:
Everyone who has tube tvs seems to say that they last, but I keep hearing that the newer flat screen types are good for 3 to 5 years. My old NEC TV is 16 and still going.



at 11/6/2007 9:48:59 AM, aBsTeR said:
my Sony Wide-Screen 61-inch is still chugging AWAY after 12 years.



at 12/30/2007 6:30:38 PM, nuffSaid said:
1996 27" Toshiba - Works great

2000 32" Toshiba - Works great

2002 32" Toshiba - Works great

Tube Rules!



at 1/2/2008 6:52:13 PM, Elvis said:
1988 46' PJ4660s rear projection TV still going....Its been through two kids, video game playing, and left on for extended periods of time. It just wont die.
I bought this TV as a floor model to boot. The remote still works too. Picture is still good but we have to fool with visual way too often

Also we have a 1982 19' JVC tube TV that has a great picture still. 26 years adn this tv is still kicking it out



at 3/14/2008 3:03:42 AM, Sandra Stevenson said:
As a gift to my parents, I purchased a Panasonic Rear Projection Television in the summer of 2001. I paid approximately $2,200 and thought I was getting a great deal as I had always thought of Panasonic as one of the leaders in consumer electronics.

About 2 to 2 ½ years into owning this TV, the red convergence started to malfunction. I contacted Panasonic and was told that my limited warranty was exactly that, LIMITED. It did not cover convergence problems. So I took this issue into my own hands and called for repair estimates. The cheapest estimate for labor and parts came to a whopping a $350.

Reluctantly, I hired a TV repairman and agreed to pay this exorbitant amount of money. He checked various components inside the TV board and proceeded to replace 2 convergence amps plus the associated resistors. There was some soldering involved and the whole process took about 2 hours. Finally, he adjusted the convergence and other data with the remote and the TV was back to normal. I was satisfied.

Fast forward another 2 years, my green convergence is out. Now, the cost of parts and labor are up to an average of $400, I’ll blame that on inflation. I bite the bullet and hire another repairman because I was too cheap to throw this unit away and buy a new TV. I should have just invested a little more money on a brand new TV set, but hindsight is 20/20.

This time, I ask the repairman a lot of questions like a student and watch his work like an eagle. He was very sympathetic and tried his best to educate me on this issue. I learned that these particular convergence amps (also known as IC’s) get very hot and blow out after a few years. He also noted that over 80% of rear projection TVs will have convergence problems due to this faulty convergence amp. The problem has become so prevalent that many repairmen are using an upgraded version of this part. The original installed part number is STK 392–110; the upgraded part number is STK 392–180. Apparently, the STK392–110 lacks in thermal performance. Simply put, they get too hot and finally they blow. Another thing he mentioned was that when this part was originally installed by Panasonic, the folks at the manufacturing plant were not applying the thermal compound grease on these ICs efficiently, thereby causing more heat to build on the IC and again causing it to blow.

Fast forward to February 2008. My horizontal blue convergence is out! I’m not paying anyone to fix it! I want Panasonic to take some responsibility and remedy my situation. On a whim, I googled my TV’s model number on the internet, PT47WX49E. There were hundreds, if not thousands of others with the same problem. There were way too many posts and forums regarding this issue. I was appalled to find that the convergence was blowing out on average of 2–4 years. It wasn’t just my particular TV model; several other Panasonic models were having the same problems. Now, would I have purchased this unit for over $2,000 if I knew that it would have problems after 2 years? That would be a definite NO.

I’ve called Panasonic at 800–211–7262 several times to absolutely no avail. Though they were somewhat polite, they were not helpful at all. In fact, I felt as though I was talking to a recording each time. The so–called reps knew nothing about the products they were selling to the public! All they could say was that the TV was no longer under warranty or there are no known recalls on this particular model or something similar in nature. They suggested I hire an authorized Panasonic repair technician!

I am well educated, but I am not wealthy by any means. I don’t have the luxury of paying $400 every 2 years to maintain this faulty TV. Even if I did have the money, this is principally WRONG on every level! This is purely a manufacturing defect. Panasonic used a faulty part. No one buys a TV with the expectation of it lasting less than 2 to 3 years. I feel terrible inside. My parents are out of a TV for the third time. They are in their 70’s, and this is pretty much how they get their source of news and entertainment. I just can’t afford another TV or another repair for that matter.

At this point, I am at my wit’s end. Has there been a class action suit against Panasonic yet? Or is it in the works as I write this? I refuse to sit back and take this from Panasonic. Who wants to file a class action suit against them with me? I’ve spent way too much time, money and energy on this issue. We need to be compensated.




at 3/14/2008 12:29:04 PM, Anon Designer said:
I'm a digital designer working on HDMI products at the moment. We have just finished putting a switch device through our reliability testing phase. There are a full suite of tests (specification by JEDEC) for rel including latch up, ESD etc, but also HTOL (High Temp Operating Life time) testing where a device is heated for 1000hrs in an oven. It is put through production test at 168, 500 and 1000hrs points to ensure the design will operated for the simualated 10 yrs of *continuous* operation. All devices should still pass test at this point and any failure be very carefully examined. Of course this is at the device level, there may be different restrains at the system level (PCB's, traces, discretes etc).



at 8/26/2008 6:56:34 AM, ljd said:
We bought an expensive Philips TV about 5 years ago. The picture is now unwatchable, and it's going to be cheaper to buy a new (non-Philips) TV. A 15 year old Toshiba, on the other hand is going fine. The Toshiba was a lot cheaper, even allowing for the fact it was bought years ago.
Paying more doesn't always guarantee a better product,well at least in the case of Philips that would seem to be the case.




at 9/3/2008 8:37:42 PM, boredgirl said:
nothing is made like it used to be. so you never really know how long something will last.. you just have to buy it and hope for the best!



at 10/12/2008 12:34:55 AM, jesus said:
New technology or features take time to mature. Old tube TV have had the benefit of mature technology and JEDEC component testing so they tend to last longer.

New technology PLASMA/LCD is fairly new so designs (system) tend to be "breaking in" or maturing so failure rates appear high. These designs tend to drive components at their limits.

If you want to spend less on maintenance buy proven design (Toyota Carmy) and it will last with simple maintenance. Buy a high performance sports car (Corvette, 350Z or Porche) and you''ll spend more on maintenance and repairs will be higher.

For me I wait for second or third generation design before buying something. Now in 2008 PLASMA and LCD are in that phase so I''ll buy one form a company with experience and history of quality.

Problem is finding a company with such history of consistent quality!



at 11/13/2008 12:14:46 PM, karlos said:
I paid €1500 for my 50 inch sony rear projction set and it has developed three faults in less than two years,first at about 9 months the HD channels started to look like 3D or ghosting. The two top corners of the screen went a greeny purple colour sent back for repair it returned after 3 weeks ghosting fixed but colors remained in corners not really noticeable unless watching a white backgroung or other light colour you could live with it. recently a yellow/green spot looking like a singe or a burn mark appeared near the middle of the screen really noticeable your eyes were always drawn to it and it appears in the center for the on screen tv guide sent back for another visit to repair shop now it appears the optical block has gone sony first told me it would cost around €2k to fix including labour on it. 2k for a 1500 set!! i told them no way was i paying that in the end the agreed to pay for the optical block and labour but want me now to pay for a replacement lamp €400 and will not release the set till i pay for it. even though as far as i could see there was no problem with the lamp it was as bright as the day i bought it. This set has been nothing but trouble for me and sonys customer service leaves a lot to be desired.I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER SONY PRODUCT AS LONG AS I LIVE AND WILL RECOMEND THAT ALL MY FRIENDS DO THE SAME



at 5/13/2009 12:42:02 PM, SonyaSunny said:
Hi,
Interesting, I`ll quote it on my site later.
SonyaSunny



at 5/28/2009 11:13:21 PM, Zoran said:
Hi,
Where are you from? Is it a secret? :)
Zoran



at 6/21/2009 12:06:39 AM, Eremeeff said:
Hi,
www.edn.com to GoogleReader!
Eremeeff



at 6/24/2009 11:55:10 AM, Rufor said:
Onload of page my antivirus put alert, check pls.




at 7/3/2009 2:41:42 AM, Dirnov said:
Everything dynamic and very positively! :)
Dirnov



at 7/28/2009 6:15:26 AM, SonyaSunny said:
Thank you! I would now go on this blog every day!


Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites