Zibb

Ron WilsonEDN Executive Editor Ron Wilson explores how IC design teams really work: the struggle for power efficiency and performance, wrestling with semiconductor processes and design methodologies, the challenges of global design teams. How do we somehow herd architecture, IP, design and verification into a successful tape-out?



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Hans Stork and the fate of semiconductor research

Oct 25 2007 9:35AM | Permalink |Comments (6) |


We commented recently on the migration of semiconductor R/D from the great private research laboratories such as the Bell and Watson Labs to industrial development centers and, it appears, from there into near extinction. At that time we pointed out that the semiconductor equipment industry has picked up a lot of the slack in process R/D and even in basic materials and physical optics research. A personnel announcement from Applied Materials today (see story here) nicely illustrates the point.

AMAT has hired Dr. Hans Stork as chief technology officer for their Silicon Systems Group. That in itself is not big news, as Dr. Stork is splendidly qualified for the role and is a great catch for AMAT. But as it happens, Stork’s curriculum vitae is almost an illustrated time line of the migration we have been discussing.

According to the press release, Stork began his industrial career in 1982 doing SiGe bipolar research and development at the TJ Watson research center of IBM. Just as the curtain was closing on the golden age of real industry-funded research, Stork moved into an R/D role in the considerably more product-focused Hewlett Packard Internet Systems and Storage Lab. From there, Stork moved to Texas Instruments, one of the last big IDMs, where he was CTO and senior vice president of Silicon Technology Development. And now he is in a similar role in an equipment company.

This evolution from research institution to systems house to semiconductor IDM to equipment company exactly traces the path of the center of effort of semiconductor research as it has migrated through the US economy. Sadly, each step in this migration has been driven not by the need to place research efforts where they can be the most effective, but by the demands for short-term operating results, making successive layers of US industry increasingly intolerant of long-term investment.

With regret, one has to assume that the end of this trajectory will place fundamental research and development outside the US altogether, in the hands of government-subsidized consortia such as IMEC and government-favored foundries such as TSMC, who are in a position to make the investment. That will mark the successful conversion of the US semiconductor industry from integrated to fab-lite, and on to intellectual-property-lite. Whether that is a sustainable position for an entire sector of the economy remains to be demonstrated.


Related entries in: Economics | Global | Research | 


Reader Comments



at 10/25/2007 1:29:30 PM, TI SITD said:
Sad, Sad, Sad^google



at 10/25/2007 4:43:19 PM, X TI Wireless said:
The US government and the semiconductor industry is shooting itself in the foot again. Aparently no one in government is concerned with implications of letting leading edge technology migrate to foreign control.



at 10/26/2007 3:28:32 AM, X TI SiTD said:
Why Stork is called "splendidly qualified" if he led TI advanced process development to the dead end?

When engineers who created semiconductor industry and integrated circuits died or retired fewer and fewer people are concerned about keeping its leading edge in teh US. Only Intel and IBM + companies allied with IBM pursue leading edge process development. Stork left IBM first. Now he seems to be dismantling that industry in the US and transferring it Taiwan.



at 10/26/2007 8:45:08 AM, HI ogm said:
The foreign world is advancing in technology with or without the help of Hans Stork and the US semiconductor industry. One thing that the "younger generation" of this industry as well as Stork has already realized is that in order to lead in the technology industry we must collaborate not just with Taiwan but with every foreign country that has a strong technology base. It is not about allowing foreign control but it has to do with realizing that there are available tools in the world that we can use to our advantage. Attempting to lock our knowledge behind closed doors will be what causes us to Shoot ourselves in the foot.



at 10/26/2007 11:20:07 AM, ex Ti SiTD said:
SiTD of TI was gone now as TI sprit.



at 11/1/2007 8:02:41 AM, ex TI ASIC said:
Debate about the fate of the US Semiconductor Industry and the US technology research in general goes far beyond the technology and technology policy. Many great Private Research Laboratories of the past were financed either through near monopolies that owned them or the generous state subsidies. Fundamental reason for the shift described lies in the inherent nature of the Anglo-Saxon capitalist model where the capital will do whatever it needs to do to preserve and grow itself, without being bound by geographic, social or environmental constraints. This makes the Anglo-Saxon capital more dynamic, vibrant and resilient, albeit to the long-term detriment for countries that employ it.


Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites