Zibb

Ron WilsonEDN Executive Editor Ron Wilson explores how IC design teams really work: the struggle for power efficiency and performance, wrestling with semiconductor processes and design methodologies, the challenges of global design teams. How do we somehow herd architecture, IP, design and verification into a successful tape-out?



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

The Tata People’s Car and the promise of automotive electronics

Jan 8 2008 11:37AM | Permalink |Comments (26) |


Tata Motors is expected to announce its long-awaited $2500 People’s Car this Thursday. Many analysts are predicting that the car, designed from a clean sheet of paper for extreme low cost and for user needs in the developing world, will be to developing countries in this decade what the Model T was to a developing USA a century ago. But some are also saying that the cost-cutting measures Tata is putting into the design will spread like a virus through the rest of an auto industry pressed on every side by saturating mid-range markets, expensive credit, and recession. That is news SoC design teams need to read twice.

The reason is that a lot of business plans for chip companies have at their foundation strong growth in complex SoCs for the automotive market: whether for infotainment, active safety, or vehicle management. All of that electronics is supposed to add substantial cost to a car every year, and it’s supposed to provide SoC developers with a growing, high-margin market for sophisticated designs on which they can differentiate themselves.

But Tata is going in exactly the opposite direction. As a New York Times article points out, Tata will sell it’s entire People’s Car for about the price of the optional DVD player on a Lexus. In fact, one of the things Tata’s designers have systematically stripped from their design is electronics content. High-end electronics content was a non-starter.

That’s not to say that you can build a better car without electronics, although some enthusiasts would embrace that argument after less than one beer. It’s to say you can build a good-enough car for the developing-world driver—a car that will far exceed his or her experience with a light motorcycle, for instance—without electronics. But why is this relevant to our mid-range automotive market in the industrialized world?

Two reasons, neither of which involves masses of Prius owners switching to People’s Cars. First, that developing-world market is likely to be far faster-growing than the Prius market. Other vendors are already watching, or in some cases actively developing competition for, the People’s Car. If it takes off, this segment could dominate design starts in the auto industry, considerably cooling the manufacturers’ appetite for new high-end or mid-range designs laden with cost and aimed at weak Western markets.

Second, if the People’s Car is successful, it will lead to more sophisticated models designed with the same “do we really need that?” ethos. This will spread the notion of minimized design through the auto industry, quite possibly with the result that manufacturers will start to aim less radical low-cost cars at their sluggish mid-range markets. That would certainly be bad news for the grand schemes of infotainment and control systems that are now showing up on high-end models and are supposed to work their way down. In short, success of the Tata vision could not only put a lot of bicycle and motor-bike users on four wheels. It could put much of the auto industry on a diet, and turn it away from its eager pursuit of electronics technology, toward a pursuit of design elegance rather than electronics overkill. And that would change a lot of chip vendors’ business plans.


Related entries in: Design and Technology | Global | Marketing | SOC (System on a chip) | 


Reader Comments



at 1/9/2008 1:00:56 PM, BRUCE HYMAN said:
i love that the temporary name is People''s Car, since i think that is an exact English equivalent of Volkswagen. hmmm.
The stories are that the PC (couldn''t resist!) will have 36 horsepower - the same as a mid-50s VW - and also will have enough luggage space for a toothbrush. in fact, the more i read, the more it looks like the original VW design brief, updated.

i was very disturbed to see that Tata is considering things like downrating the wheel bearings to 45mph, even though the vehicle is capable of 70ish. while there is not much doubt that it will still be safer than putting a family of 5 on a scooter, i wonder whether a few percent more in the price could provide a lot more basic safety.





at 1/9/2008 1:33:29 PM, SB said:
This is too much of an exaggerated News. The SOC and Automobile Ifotainment systems are aimed at Hih-end cars. The users of those cars will never get de-motivated by the Cheaper cars. The market for the hihg-end cars would continue to grow, as people continue to appreciate the comfort and features they can enjoy in their new cars.



at 1/9/2008 1:36:15 PM, BRUCE HYMAN said:
since Tata is buying Jaguar, is it fair to say "Ta-Ta, Jaguar?"



at 1/9/2008 2:18:41 PM, Les Moore said:
Its a new market. More people will have personal transportation. We have millions of people who can't afford modern cars. A modern Model T could revitalize poorer countries.



at 1/9/2008 8:33:40 PM, Shashidhar Gokhale said:
I very much doubt whether the car price will be $2500 on the road. It may slowly rise toward $4000 by quoting various reasons. It will be wonderful and dream come true for many people if it will be really available for $2500 as per the promise.



at 1/9/2008 10:11:02 PM, Ravindra said:
Govt. should ban to manufacture low cost CARS as it will create chacos on road as many people don't have driving sense and this will make traffic conditioin more pathetic in any city of India



at 1/9/2008 11:40:44 PM, Martin ST said:
This is about a new type of car that could significantly increase the number of cars driving around this world due to low price. Now how can a few revised business plans within our little industry be more important than the issue of increased use of fossile fuels leading to increased CO2 emission contributing to already catastrophic climate change?



at 1/10/2008 6:13:23 AM, NP said:
I think this is an AWESOME idea...as a teacher on a VERY limited income, this would be the PERFECT work car. I travel 3 miles to work through town...I would keep my large car to transport my grandchildren for safety...but the Nano is a GREAT second vehicle for me since riding a bike on the roads I need to use is not safe.



at 1/10/2008 6:32:18 AM, JJPEngr said:
This overlooks regulatory requirements. The developing markets will not have to meet emissions and safety requirements that industrialized nations have. Many of these regulations require sophisticated electronics to meet. While these minimalist cars will certainly be built in volume, they will not be a factor in Western markets where customer expectations are far different in addition to the regulatory requirements.
Only fringe customers in industrialized nations would find such a bare bones car acceptable.



at 1/10/2008 8:21:42 AM, NotPC said:
The model name is just too funny. Visions of pairs of beetle like cars with the appropriate paint.



at 1/10/2008 9:13:16 AM, Lou Covey said:
I seem to remember similar hoopla about a low cost, no-frills car a coupe of decades ago. Oh yeah, remember the Yugo? That was big success too, wasn't it?
I agree with Ravindra and JJ. The electronics content in cars began with infotainment systems, but rapidly expanded with government regulations on safety, fuel consumption and reliability. The developing world has no such restrictions ... yet. International global warning requirements are going to press the developing nations to require those same restrictions.
And while $2500 for a new car sounds marvelous here, in a developing country, that could represent the annual income of several families.




at 1/10/2008 2:16:59 PM, MG said:
I dont get the hoopla about emissions. As far as I know, new cars in India need to match recent European emission standards and I expect the Nano will also have to satisfy these regulations. Does anyone have definite information to the contrary ?



at 1/11/2008 6:41:25 AM, SMK said:
Catching that trend is about as important as catching any trend which has the potential to kill us all. We will not have the resources in the future so that a substantial part of the developing world can own cars. We will not be able to cope with the pollution if a substantial part of the developing world will own cars, either.

On average humans are too intelligent to make these trends long-lived. If you count on them being too stupid you'll likely end up in the same position as those car manufacturers who kept turning out SUVs. In the unlikely event that humans do turn out to be sufficiently stupid you might have a good business case - but you won't survive the trend anyway.

So why bother? You can't win with any self-destructive trend.

The Tata will just turn into the next Dodo.




at 1/15/2008 11:15:19 AM, ron said:
MG:
You are correct. According to the Tata announcement, the Nano meets current European emissions standards, and current Indian crash-safety standards.



at 1/17/2008 1:46:55 PM, Raju said:
I heard on the BBC that one Indian Traffic congestion expert commented India needs better Public Transport than a cheap car. But, as Tata says, this car is targeted for rural, semi-urban areas.

And, India can surely look at exporting the People's car. Look at how Japan transformed itself by exporting cars. Today, in the IT industry, the salary ratio is 1:5, ie an Indian engineer's salary is 1/5th that of his Western counterpart. If Tata can leverage the labor advantage to export this car even at 1/2 price of what a Western company can make it at, it is a win situation.



at 1/22/2008 9:23:06 PM, Hithesh said:
Terrific achievement by TaTa group. Another pull over gimmick to attract the masses to stretch a little more from their pocket. Add 20k more get a car!!!! I believe the resale value for a small size car (Maruthi,opel,indica etc etc) will get reduced.. that's all nothing much will happen..( Stop thinking about more sales, life comfortable etc etc) and with oil prices soaring... Well this news is just another tit bit..

www.edocprocure.com



at 2/5/2008 1:30:42 PM, mahesh said:
For a country like India, developing/improving public transportation is much more important than introducing a low-cost car. Driving on roads in the big metros will be even more painful for all. During peak times, it takes about 2 hours to drive 10 KM(6 miles). After a couple of years, it might take 3 hours, for the same distance..mmm. makes me wonder?



at 6/12/2008 1:33:38 PM, POP HYMAN said:
I love the racist anglo's bashing this as a remake of Volkswagen or Model-T, and claiming that moving poor countries to using automobiles will have a negative environmental affect. blah blah.

Nevermind that the first cars were invented to replace horse drawn carriages and their associated environmental impact. What's the impact of replacing all the 2-stroke engines in scooters and motorbikes with cleaner burning 4-cycle engines?



at 8/6/2008 10:43:49 AM, Bluesmiester said:
One commenter refernced the Yugo as an illustration of failure for this concept.
It pays to know the the death of Yugo was not market accepatance (they were alble to sell them) but resistance by the factory workers to rampant design changes which required relearning the assembly process (sometimes it changed weekly). If the PC can meet the regulatory requiremnts in the US it WILL sell and other car malers will try to enter that market segment. Scary for me as I work at a major FPGA company that has big plans for the automotive market.



at 9/18/2008 2:22:24 PM, fat and dubious said:
Remember the Yugo in the 80's. Nuff said,



at 10/10/2008 2:01:21 PM, Ravi said:
Very noble act indeed! Now if we can just buy the roads and freeways to drive the People's Car, and affordable gas (petrol/CNG) world hunger will be solved.



at 11/24/2008 5:11:32 AM, rudiemods said:
That's a really cute !!
I am new to your blog and found it very refreshing and informative.




at 1/6/2009 9:45:09 PM, Devinder Shutwal said:
I have to know more information on Electronic car would you provide me information
Thank you




at 3/18/2009 2:03:48 PM, rodxtal said:
The impact of looser emmisions in this case may be less than you think. It''s a case of apples vs oranges. A 38 hp, 1500 lb car would have to be pretty bad to emit as much per mile as a 380 hp, 5500 lb Tundra, even with its better PPM performance. Emmisions specs in PPM unfairly favor conspicuous consumption vehicles over economical ones.



at 7/30/2009 4:03:17 AM, Alis Jones said:
I think, we and all scooter owners should thank Tata to launch the new people's car.. even if it is small and lacks some features and horsepower, what else do you expect on four wheels at a cost little higher than a two wheeler. If the cost were increased by some % to bring into some more features, it would have become a CAR and no more a replacement to a scooter.. it is a perfect replacement for scooters and a preventive measure from climatic trauma for scooter bearers.

Alis Jones
nationaltransportllc.com



at 8/6/2009 5:30:08 AM, nisha said:
Cheap new cars
We can now find you the best deals for the new car you are looking for by searching across our panel of manufacturer dealers across the whole of the UK.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites