Paul RakoTechnical Editor Paul Rako looks at analog technology in power supplies, interface, the signal path, and life in general.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Analog Design Articles

Blog

Thursday, January 1, 2009

Consumers want ease-of-use, not features

Jan 1 2009 10:28AM | Permalink |Email this|Comments (11) |


Drew Winter over at Ward’s Auto World has a great editorial about a new “breakthrough”. That breakthrough is the realization that people don’t care about all kinds of whizzy features as much as they do about user friendliness. He attended the same SAE Convergence conference that I did in October 2008, and saw all the presentations about human interface design. This was where I told you about Honda’s work showing that people loved heads up displays. Drew gives the classic example of the BMW iDrive, the geek-fest monstrosity that had 700 menu picks and took 7 of them just to change a radio station. Consumer Reports says it takes 9 steps to change the clock. Drew notes the BMW has gotten with the program and added a few buttons to the base of the joystick. In other words, they got a little analog, and realized there is a sense of importance to control interfaces. That is why the steering wheel is a big round thing right in your face and the Bass Boost is a tiny insignificant button on the console. Artsy types and Japanese consumer electronics designers have this Church-lady tidiness that makes them have all the buttons be the same size and all in tidy little rows. Total moron geeks then replace all the buttons with one big one, but rather than use Morse Code or some standard, they have to dream up some new goofy single-point-interface tapping code, or perhaps I should call it a puzzle.

 

The new BMW iDrive for 2009, note the dedicated buttons and descriptive labels.

 

The old BMW iDrive, designed by the same idiots that put one knob on HP oscilloscopes back in the 1980s.

Note how the new design actually used real English words printed in bold san-serif letters to convey information. That is another pet peeve of mine, the love of icons. This is not all the automakers fault. When I was a design engineer at Ford Motor back in the 1980s, Ford begged the government to let them put plain English labels under the heater control icons. Ford argued that words are icons too, and that words are far more understandable than some graphical icon. Our dear beloved government would not let Ford use words for the controls, because the Untied States Government has so much contempt for you they think you will be confused if there is a word and an icon in the same button. Just go to your cube, sit at your desk and eat the food pellet that falls when you have typed enough. Our finance industry needs the loot.


Related entries in: Analog | 


Reader Comments



at 1/2/2009 1:54:35 AM, Alex Hiley said:
Speaking as a designer, use icons if you're selling internationally. Speaking as a user, very few icons are self-explanatory and I'd much rather see words. Perhaps eventually we'll have little flexible displays on every button. Once you've set the language on the main display then all the buttons would display words in the correct language. On the other hand the electrical connections to all those buttons would be a bit of a nightmare and just extra stuff to go wrong.



at 1/3/2009 11:04:57 AM, Steve Williams said:
Somehow all this reminds me of old European consumer electronics (and cars for that matter) that left you pondering what the switch with a red dot on one side and a blue and a yellow dot on the other side did...



at 1/5/2009 2:37:07 PM, JOHN CHAMBLESS said:
ALL COMPUTERS SHOULD BE ELIMINATED FROM CARS AND GO BACK TO KNOBS AND SWITCHES WITH ENGLISH LABELS. SAME FOR CELL PHONES, WHY CAN''T I GET A CELL PHONE THAT LETS ME LISTEN WNEN IT RINGS AND LETS ME PUNCH IN A NUMBER WHEN I WANT TO CALL SOMEONE, I DON/T WANT TEXT MESSAGES AND I DON''T NEED A BUILT IN CAMERA



at 1/5/2009 2:37:12 PM, Hjalmar said:
Almost as bad as those dopey letters at the bottom of the page that look like they were handwritten by someone in an alcoholic stupor to prove you are not an mechanical device posting a comment.



at 1/5/2009 2:39:46 PM, Frustrated user said:
Speaking of idiots, I love that the manufacturer of my cell phone at least included an ICON gallery three levels deep in the menu. Because of that I can spend only a few minuts in the menu, rather than looking for the book, or looking on line to figure out that my phone is trying to tell me that I had a missed call! Count me in the camp of wants ease of use. I already have so many features that I can't stand more



at 1/5/2009 6:14:38 PM, feature hater said:
I'm all for less features and easier to use. Give me a cell phone that allows me to make a phone call, no camera, no text messaging, no calculator, no stopwatch, Why, my phone has so many features that it will actually randomly call a number from my phone list, at random times, even with the cover closed, while the phone is in my pocket! Then allow whoever it calls to listen in on what I happen to be saying to someone in person at the time. No Kidding! Is there such a thing as a phone virus?



at 1/5/2009 6:33:18 PM, Mr. Write said:
As a proponent of quality UI and usability I can tell you from experience how the software and hardware engineers get in there and screw everything up. They think they are so much smarter than the user (i.e. customer) and will do whatever they want when it comes to the interface. I''ve had more than my share of unconventional conversations trying to convince a large room of supposed engineers that the customer does not want to re-format the hard drive while capturing data, or some such nonsense. I believe that all engineers, both software and hardware, must be required to go through usability and user interface training, be made to suffer for weeks with crappy UIs before they can even pretend to design any facet of a user interface. A mile in the customer''s shoes is what I say.



at 1/6/2009 12:24:14 AM, Battar said:
I've had it up to here trying to explain to engineers that they are not designing equipment for their own use. My advice is, design an interface, then find the dumbest technophobe in the company (You will usually locate him in Marketing) and ask if he can figure it out for himself. If he can't, you've got the design wrong.



at 1/6/2009 2:15:29 AM, CB said:
You do not have to find the dumbest technophobe in marketing within the company but start to teach the engineers and designers to listen to customers. Yes everyone needs simple things but most of all intuitive. Then a very good engineer will make this happening .



at 1/6/2009 2:44:29 AM, colin dore said:
Some engineers recognise the need for simplicity. I am working with some guys who are developing a 'programmable display'button which could have any icon or word on it. This would be ideal for international customisation or personal preference settings.



at 1/6/2009 8:05:29 AM, Peter S said:
I imagine ease of use is why the iPhone wins out. I DO want a camera, and a calculator, music player etc all in one product, but ONLY if I can get at each feature EASILY, and it performs properly. I''m an engineer, and I say you can''t leave ease of use to us, even with training. We thrive on complexity, we are not typical of the customer base....

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites