Zibb

Paul RakoTechnical Editor Paul Rako looks at analog technology in power supplies, interface, the signal path, and life in general.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Analog Design Articles

Blog

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Digital television still sucks, but not as bad

Jun 17 2009 6:32PM | Permalink |Comments (7) |


I told you DTV sucked a year ago and nothing has changed. The linked article still purports that digital transmissions are more efficient but we all know they are part of a deal to push the broadcasting industry into the corner so the cell phone companies and Google and Intel can use the old analog TV bands. Consumer editor Brian Dipert had a nice article on the shortcomings of the transition. I was glad to see the mainstream media picked up most of my caveats about how you still need an antenna and that you probably need an outside antenna and rotator. I blogged about the transition in May 2008, December 2008, January 2009, as well as in February 2009. I figured that there would be fewer problems since the information about the crappy DTV reception would prepare people. I was saddened to see that the FCC took 317,450 calls Friday from people that lost reception.

One thing that I forgot to repeatedly warn people about was the fact that the channel numbers you “tune” to and the real actual frequency has nothing to do with each other. See, software people have infected the TV and now we have indirect pointers to linked list arbitrary virtual crap in our most fundamental consumer product. So the broadcast people were smart to warn us to re-scan for the new station assignments. Sure enough, some of the stations that have been given UHF frequencies for their DTV had poor reception problems when the FCC moved them down to upper VHF band. Some stations have broadcast that their coverage is now worse, something Dipert pointed out in his article. Let me point out that this makes the FCC, well it’s not nice to call them liars, but lets just say their promises for DTV were “counterfactual”.

Now the good news. I have rebuilt and installed my ham-grade rotator and raised the antenna up 3 more feet and my reception is acceptable. I used to be amazed when my buddy Alan told me he gets 49 stations but I get 47. Only all the secondary stations count to that total, so 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, and 9.5 are 5 of the 47. I can only receive three analog channels now. Channel 11 has a screen telling you to buy a converter box, channel 40 is too fuzzy to see what is going on and I get KDTVCA channel 28 from Santa Rosa but it is pretty fuzzy. My DTV is not perfect by any means. I have noticed that when certain cars start in the parking lot across the street, my picture breaks up. I assume the car has hot ignition or a bad plug wire. My ABC station that used to be rock solid is now a bit spotty. All that being said, if you hate cable companies as bad as I do, you can still get a great picture when over-the-air stations broadcast 1080i. This is the best strategy for broadcast stations, to have their primary station in HD and a secondary station in SD for older sets. I have already pointed out that if a station splits its band up to 5 stations like channel 9 does, the picture quality is crap.

Real-life TV transmitter engineer Robert Getsla sent along a couple article for us. One discusses the problems with DTV reception. Another article looks at the impact on local stations. A scary one points out that the DTV transition may have had the effect of killing broadcast TV. Finally he sent one to show the cable companies are trying to tie your entire home network into theirs. I, for one, am not a fan. Just give me DHCP and a SMTP server, thanks.

There is still plenty of ignorance to go around, check out this article about the winners and losers of DTV. Sorry, the people lost and the broadcast industry loses (but they may have had it coming for starting the monster in the first place). Rural folks lose. Winners are the cell phone companies that gobbled up the spectrum, the FCC that made billions on the auctions and Intel and Google that got some whitespace proposals granted. Cable and satellite companies won since people will switch. I guess taxpayers gained on the money collected by the FCC and then lost when the government gave it all to the banker CEO cronies. Call that one a wash.

Now I give the FCC a lot of guff since they are now a political organization and not a technical one. Still, the FCC is full of pretty decent folks so you can expect them to try and fix particular instances of DTV problems. Here in the SF Bay area we are reconfiguring towers and boosting broadcast power. Bob Getsla talked about how his station will add a repeater so their station coming off Mt Bruno can get to their Chinese audience in San Francisco that is blocked by Mt Sutro. So yeah, the tech people will come to the rescue again. If you signed up for that free basic cable be sure to check out over the air TV in a year before you start paying. Folks like Getsla will do everything they can to get you good reception, for free, forever.


Related entries in: Analog | 


Reader Comments



at 6/18/2009 7:53:38 AM, Editor said:
Lately, the more things change the worse they get it seems. I recommend changing the title to "DTV still sucks." If there was a "but not as bad" in the info you posted, I missed it. Thanks!



at 6/18/2009 12:44:15 PM, Meredith Poor said:
"...software people have infected the TV and now we have indirect pointers to linked list arbitrary virtual crap...". I love the language. Reminds me of "turbo encabulator". TV is infected with so much crap the software people get virtually swapped in and out in so little time that they're imperceptible. Sex, drugs, rent seeking, political posturing, and general whining occupy a lot more of the bandwidth, so throttling it is probably an improvement. While software is generally infectious, software people are generally quite a bit less so.



at 6/19/2009 3:52:49 AM, David Smith said:
There are a number of reasons why the US DTV transition is a consumer fiasco.
a) They used assumptions that everybody would have 30 ft outdoor antennas with rotors.
b) The use of a mixed VHF/UHF DTV system was a recipe for a coverage and consumer trainwreck.
c) The ATSC system is abysmal at handling multipath compared to the DVB-T, ISDB-T, FlO and other OFDM based systems which are used virtually everywhere else. This is very well known and is why so few countries have adopted ATSC: Taiwan ditched ATSC for DVB-T and most of South America is going DVB-T and ISDB-T.
d) They were warned but completely ignored this.

The result is that US DTV does indeed suck and as a result of the 'consumer experience' or downright hassle US OTA broadcasting is likely to be on life support in the next few years as US viewers depart to pay providers.



at 6/19/2009 3:54:10 PM, Mike Licht said:
DTV reception is a real problem out near Alpha Centauri.

See:

notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/06/19/digital-tv-transition-rough-on-space-aliens/



at 7/7/2009 6:30:56 AM, Max Power said:
East of nyc - VHF stations 7,11,13 are vey weak that even the largest of antennas can't get reliable recption - The UHF stations have lots of pixaltion. For me over the air TV is dead - The FCC has won


FCC should increase power on ALL DTV stations, especially the VHF broadcasters.



at 8/19/2009 9:02:40 PM, G. W. said:
I'm in Minnesota, where there is a large rural area away from broadcast hubs. Many people had good analog reception of a few channels on VHF. Now with the power reduction and move to all high band VHF and UHF, we get squat. I built a good antenna array myself, and have found that rain, wet leaves, leaves blowing in the wind, sunshine, and the moon phase all seem to hose up reception. No cable companies around, and I'm not going to pay for a whole raft of crud off a satellite dish. I heard that that the FCC hopes that broadcasters will install repeaters to enhance signal coverage. We'll see.



at 11/13/2009 7:10:49 PM, PWRose said:
Not Only Does the reception here still suck, It has gotten worse. Since all the local stations did a little 'adjustment' recently requiring a re-scan on the DTV tuner, Most of my TV watching is plagued with constant audio drop outs, freeze frames, and occasional complete loss of signal. I've been using a fairly large VHF-UHF Antenna and rotor, and an RF amp on the incoming line. Before the big switch, I could get Analog TV stations from afar. After the switch, I lost some of the farthest, but could still get fairly acceptable DTV from most locals, with the occasional drop outs. Now it's totally FUBAR.
I think we need to go back to analog. At least in analog, I could listen to Jeopardy and hear all the dialog with out the infuriating d__pou__!
Y__ ___, i_ ___lly su___ w__n __u got__ __ten __ li__ ____ __l th_ __me.
LET'S BRING BACK ANALOG!

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites