Paul RakoTechnical Editor Paul Rako looks at analog technology in power supplies, interface, the signal path, and life in general.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Analog Design Articles

Blog

Monday, August 25, 2008

Solar plane with lithium-sulfur batteries

Aug 25 2008 6:14AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (8) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


The staid and analytical BBC has an article about a solar-powered airplane that uses lithium-sulfur batteries to stay aloft at 60,000 feet for three days. The video is pretty good, actually informative rather then TV-newscaster fluff. Pretty cool, I had not seen LiS batteries before, but the little factual material I can find on them points out the 60 charge cycles you get out of them before they are junk. The datasheet for the batteries in the plane (pdf) shows that most of the energy comes out a 2.1 volts, which means it will need a buck-boost converter for consumer products, and the –20 C rating means it will have a hard time in cars, that need to go down to –40 C. If they do have twice the energy density of lithium polymer that is really something, at least if they are talking about gravimetric energy density, volumetric energy density is not so important in portable applications. The datasheet shows 350 Wh/kg, which is better than the 150 to 190 that you get from li-cobalt. Of course every thinkgeek type of entry on the web has the typical 3 or 4 clueless fanboyz saying "Dell should adopt this right now". The article mentions Sion Corporation as the battery manufacturer, and I have seen reference to Saft (pdf) although it was not clear if Saft was proposing a primary or secondary (rechargeable) battery. As with most batteries LiSu is supposed to be lousy at cold, but the BBC article points out the plane was operating at –70 C, so that makes this achievement even more remarkable.

What also surprised me was the solar plane's use of amorphous silicon solar cells, since they would have less output that crystalline cells, Sunpower is bragging abut 22% efficient crystalline cells, and cell that are based on the III-V materials like gallium arsinide can do even better since it is a direct bandgap semiconductor, unlike silicon. I suspect that they used amorphous cells since it could be bent around the airfoil of the wing. This is a remarkable engineering achievement, I am one of those guys that think an ounce of trial is worth a pound of press releases. I do know better than to think we will all be running our cars and laptops off LiSu anytime soon, when it comes to technology, I don’t think it is real until I can find it in the Digi-Key catalog.


Related entries in: Analog | 


Reader Comments


at 8/25/2008 2:04:24 PM, Larry M said:
"...most of the energy comes out a 2.1 volts, which means it will need a buck-boost converter for consumer products...." You can't just put them in series? Like we've done with two-cell flashlights for a century?

at 8/25/2008 4:49:43 PM, Rod L said:
Lithium sulfer primary batteries have been around for at least 20 years. However, they do have a nasty habit of venting (and even exploding). Not a consumer item.

at 8/26/2008 1:39:53 PM, Richard C said:
You mean like Sony Li-Ion?

at 8/26/2008 2:51:33 PM, Quent said:
I read this article because I am starting two project, one needs batteries and the other needs solar cells. I have used batteries before for projects. But with those projects almost any consumer battery would work. This time I need to engineer them. Dose anybody know of a good book on battery types, their pro and cons, that is not based on my brand battery is best. With the other project, I need to use solar cells and I have never tried using them before. So the same type of question, dose anyone know of a good book on solar cell basics and design technique? Thanks for the help!

at 8/28/2008 1:52:10 PM, Paul Rako said:
Sorry to be unclear Larry, putting rechargeable cells in series is a real nightmare-- witness the Sony laptops catching fire. You have to balance the cell charging, which means you need multiple precision chargers. You are right that it is done, heck I have done it myself, but in the context of handheld devices like cell phones and MP3 players, a single cell is the holy grail of power system design. As for Quent, you can start off at Margery Conner''s blog about solar cells: www.edn.com/blog/1470000147/post/1040031904.html I suspect your best bet is searching wikipedia-- do you need rechargeable batteries? There are two popular ones, nickel metal hydride and lithium ion. And don''t forget lead acid, the old workhorse. It all depends on your application. Searching the web should get you started, both technologies are changing so fast books are being obsoleted.

at 8/28/2008 2:32:13 PM, Tim G said:
McGraw-Hill Handbook of Batteries is the bible for battery people.

at 9/2/2008 10:36:45 AM, Quent said:
Thanks to both of you for your help!! I do appreciate the help. Thanks Again

at 9/3/2008 2:35:44 PM, Alan R. Weiss said:
Lithium Phosphate batteries (i.e. like those from Valence Technologies in Austin, Texas) are far safer and have good duty cycle capabilities. They are much safer than standard lithium ion (LiOn) batteries. Disclaimer: my company, Synchromesh Computing, writes battery management, configuration, and control software for Valence. We do have a lot of experience with them, and they''re a really good advance in technology.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.