Jun 15 2009 12:40PM | Permalink |Comments (17) |
The last few years several companies have been inventing amplifier classes, not as a legitimate architecture class, but as a marketing trick. The first I heard about was TriPath who called their class-D amplifier a class-T. Interesting to note they are out of business now. Last year a nice marketing guy from Wolfson told me about their new “class-W” amplifier in their new codec. He kept asking me what I thought of the class-W moniker that I assumed he dreamed up. He was a nice guy and Wolfson is a really excellent company, so I didn’t have the heart to tell him that I thought inventing amplifier classes as a marketing ploy only degrades the message. At least they put scare quotes around the name. I was at Fairchild last week and they talked about a class-F amplifier. I sure hope they are referring to the real class-F amp as described in the literature and not some marketing gimmick that uses first letter in their company name. The excellent amplifier class overview in Wikipedia says that Crown dreamed up a Class-I and Lab.gruppen has fabricated class-TD. Well, I consider all these to be class-BS. It does no service to engineers to invent a plethora of amplifier classes when pretty much every possible method already has a class. You can imagine my relief when Maxim called me up last year about their new audio chips and they properly called it a class-G rather then saying it was class-M.
Marketing people love to throw around adverbs and adjectives. Part of an editors job here at EDN is to strip out all the hyperbole and just give you the bare facts so you can make up your own mind. We all remember those op-amp datasheets with “low-power” in the title and they use 12 mA. That may have been low power in 1985, but we do a lot better today. If you want your company name to be in the initials of the amplifier class go buy Allen Bradley and introduce a new class-AB amplifier. ‘Til then, the engineering community is best served by the standard classes described in the Wikipedia article. Those are:
These are the main classes that are in use; there is also a class-I that sounds like a power converter architecture (not sure if this is the Crown invention) and class-J that combines a class-D with a class-B. The class-S is now called a class-D, see the reference website in the Wiki article. Others are:
These classes might be used more in RF, I described the Doherty amplifier in my article about RF power amps. Now if Jim Williams or Bob Pease or Dave Freeman or Barry Harvey or Barry Gilbert calls me up all excited at four in the morning and tells me that they have invented a new amplifier class, I will be the first to tell you about it, but if it is a marketing person, well I have a very big grain of salt on my nightstand to take along with any claim of a new amplifier architecture class.
Related entries in: Analog |