Zibb

Warren WebbTechnical editor Warren Webb comments on board-level embedded hardware, development tools, and software. No chips!



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Applied System Design Articles

Blog

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Wireless module claims five year battery life

Apr 7 2009 7:30PM | Permalink |Comments (2) |


With the proliferation of Wi-Fi networks embedded designers are turning to wireless interfaces to eliminate the expensive wiring and installation costs for commercial and industrial sensing applications. The major challenge has been the relatively short battery life for remote sensors interfaced through the wireless network. RF Monolithics recently announced a potential solution with their new Wi-Fi sensor networking module. The WSN802G is a low-power, low-cost, 802.11 b/g module suitable for wireless sensor networking applications due to its ability to operate for years on battery power. To achieve its low power consumption and long battery life, the WSN802G combines 1 Mb/s and 2 Mb/s data rates, which are appropriate for most sensing applications, with an advanced sleep management feature that puts the module to sleep between active periods. Depending upon the frequency of active periods, a single AA Lithium cell can provide a battery life in excess of 5 years. When the module is active, its current consumption is less than 200 mA, allowing a battery to adequately power the device. Its sleep current consumption is less than 8 uA. Typical transmission ranges are 50 meters indoors and 250 meters outdoors. The WSN802G features a 1.0 x 1.05 inch footprint and a $69 price tag for single units or $39 in quantities of 10,000 or more. The WSN802GDK developer kit will also be available by the end of April 2009 to help design engineers fast track their applications.


Related entries in: Embedded Systems | Power Sources/Controllers | 


Reader Comments



at 4/13/2009 5:00:44 AM, bellaire said:
It seems good but 200mA that is no achievement that is a fifth of an amp. Get the running current down to 10ma that is worthy of credit



at 4/14/2009 5:57:11 AM, Roberto Mariani said:
Well, maybe there's a typo: instead of "[...] due to its ability to OPERATE for years on battery power.", it should read "[...] due to its ability to STAND BY for years on battery power."



ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites