Advertisement

Zibb

Ed SperlingOffering news and business analysis for the design engineer, Managing News Editor Suzanne Deffree filters the electronics industry's developments and trends to explain how what's happening in the board room today can impact the tech innovation of tomorrow. Follow Suzanne on Twitter, @Deffree. Suzanne also manages EDN's Twitter account, @EDNMagazine.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

News Center Articles

Blog

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Moto suspends 401 (k) contributions, freezes salaries, cuts CEOs' pays by 25%

Dec 17 2008 11:52AM | Permalink |Comments (21) |


Motorola Inc is cutting costs again, but this time it's doing so without laying off. 

The once-top cell phone maker today announced changes to employee compensation and benefit programs, as well as changes to executive compensation, that will take shape next year.

The cost-reduction actions come in addition to the $800 million savings plan Moto announced in late October. That plan calls for a delayed spinout of Moto's loss-inducing mobile devices business, formally announced in March, and some 3,000 job cuts.  Those layoffs will put Moto's total headcount cut at more than 13,000 for the year. Motorola employed 66,000 employees in 2007.

First, the cuts to employees: Today's cost-reduction action will first see Moto temporarily suspend all company matching contributions to its 401(k) Plan, effective January 1, 2009. US employees may continue to contribute to the 401(k) plan, but will not receive matching contributions from the company.

Then, come March 1, 2009, Moto will permanently freeze its US pension plans. Saying the effort is "to better align with industry norms," the company will preserve vested benefits accrued by employees and retirees, but will eliminate future benefit accruals.

Moto has also implemented a salary freeze for its employees.

Are the employee benefit reductions out of line? While the cuts may be out of the ordinary for tech companies, which in recent years have relied on benefits and salary to woo top talent, step out of the tech sector and you'll find that few US companies have pensions anymore and that many don't contribute to 401 (k)s.

Yet, while its great that Moto's is attempting to avoid further diminishing its talent pool with another round of layoffs, the benefit reductions and salary freeze can't be good for morale. Moto is now a company with significantly less headcount and, from what I hear from its employees, overburdened workers, who are doing their work, plus the work of their laid-off ex-coworkers, and who will now see less compensation come the new year.

On the executive end, Moto's co-CEOs, Greg Brown and Sanjay Jha, will voluntarily take a 25% decrease in base salary in 2009. Moto further said that Brown will voluntarily forgo any 2008 cash bonus earned under the Motorola incentive plan. While Jha’s employment contract -- inked just this August when the exec moved to Moto from Qualcomm --  provides for a guaranteed cash bonus for 2008, his bonus will also be voluntarily reduced by an amount equal to Brown’s forfeited bonus and the remainder will be taken in the form of restricted stock units.

In this blog's last entry, the matter of cutting executive salaries came up in the comment field with mixed reaction to such moves. Normally, I'd write that any company so deep in the hole as Moto is should see its C-level execs put in stocks in the company's lobby for employees to riddle and pummel with rotten fruit, but Brown and Jha are new to their CEO roles.

Although with Moto since 2003, Brown moved to his CEO post in January after Ed Zander left, and Jha, as stated above, came to the company in August, just before the financial crisis began to impact US companies. Not to defend the company's standing, but the fact is neither exec has had substantial time or a solid enough economic environment as a CEO to bring Moto back to its former grandeur.

What do you think? How do you feel about such cuts to employee benefits? Are they better than layoffs or is it just another was to abuse a workforce? And what do you think about the CEO-level pay cuts? Voice your opinion below.


Reader Comments



at 12/17/2008 2:03:38 PM, Anil said:
Are they saying, we are taking away all your benefits so whoever can find another job can leave instead of layoff.



at 12/17/2008 2:10:08 PM, American Worker said:
Until the joke called H-1B is put under control and outsourcing to other countries stopped this diminishment of the worker will continue. Corporate America goes for the quick $$. The Top Corp players make out with their bonus'' and stock options and could care less for the future of the company or it''s employees. The squeeze on the worker is being seen now that our consumer driven economy is in the toilet. My biggest fear is yet to be seen, what happens in 20-30 years when all these people whos pension stopped growing in 2008 and had their contributions to their (killed in 2008 by the stock market) 401K halved because the companies wanted to remain "competetive"? They will have very little to rely on. On that note, I say its high time that all government workers get the same treatment as us public sector foks. Why should a teacher enjoy being able to retire at 57 with full pay AND cost of living benefits? Its time for Americans to stand up collectivly and demand that the sell out of this country stops NOW!



at 12/17/2008 2:12:28 PM, Dave said:
CEO paycuts should always be the first line of defense.



at 12/17/2008 2:12:55 PM, Sad but true said:
being a Motorolan I can say it would be nice to still have the perks that were just taken away "temporarily" but the alternative might be more layoffs and that would be much worse.



at 12/17/2008 2:13:41 PM, exmoto said:
I have always considered a 10% pay cut more manageable than a 100% pay cut.



at 12/17/2008 2:14:16 PM, none said:
no pay raises is nothing new. low employee morale? puhleez. they are lucky to have a job. It's a free country, leave if you think you can find something better. CEO pay level cuts are nothing new either. I know of a CEO that took $1 salary for over a year. On the other hand, so what about the car companies doing massive layoffs. The government isn't bailing out all companies such as moto. The requirement for the bailout is that all executive officers of a company should be for them to take a salary cut.




at 12/17/2008 2:18:59 PM, Dean said:
Let''s look at this another way, they aren''t losing ALL benefits, only the "extra" benefits of the 401(k)and a salary freeze. They apparently still have the medical benefits and others not mentioned (paid time off such as vacation time?). While losing these benefits is not pleasing, not having a regular pay check is FAR LESS pleasing! Hopefully, they will come back when this is all over.



at 12/17/2008 2:20:41 PM, Brian said:
Welcome to the world of the salaried workforce at the Big Three. We have had salaried freezes, executive compansation cuts and bonus elimination, 401K matching elimination, salary freezes,pension freezes, health care cuts for the past few years. In addition to severe headcount reductions. But you wouldn't know it by how the media is playing out the Big Three Loan Request. Guess they will have to go into bankruptcy to straighten the poor management and overpaid work force too!



at 12/17/2008 2:35:30 PM, Don said:
We''re in a world economy - it''s competitive. Our local economy is getting more competitive. We need to quit complaining, roll up our sleeves and get to work. Otherwise we''ll lose on both fronts. For those of us that still have jobs, we need to help our neighbors beyond what most of us are used to - it''s a whole lot more effective than expecting the government to do it at tax payer expense. We have all the resources we need right here in the USA to be a great nation. The question is, "Do we have the will to do it?"



at 12/17/2008 3:04:46 PM, BeenThereDoneThat said:
Necessary, but insufficient. More layoffs to come.



at 12/17/2008 3:20:10 PM, CommonSense said:
I like seeing leadership take the cut 1st. Sets an example.
It is a world economy and we need to stay competitive as others have said.



at 12/17/2008 3:37:53 PM, njineer said:
It''s about time that CEO''s took a hit too, particularly if they have been with the company a long time and created the problem. It burns me up inside to watch CEO''s take away massive compensation packages whether the company is doing well or not - if times are good, they demand an exhorbitant compensation package for driving company growth



at 12/17/2008 3:45:09 PM, Prefer-to-keep-my-job-anonymous said:
As a Motorolan I am contractually forbidden from discussing how I feel about the leadership. In my career, I have never seen a company so bent on reducing the quality of employee benefits. My philosophy is "One cannot ''save'' your way to financial stability". Motorola has massive human resources but squanders most of it with internal inefficiencies to the point that products are missing their window of opportunity. At least Motorola management is not suicidally self-destructive like Yahoo.



at 12/17/2008 7:08:30 PM, gmne said:
What role did Karl Icahn play in this ?



at 12/17/2008 8:31:37 PM, About to start my life at Moto said:
Man, despite the news about Moto''s paycuts, I am very grateful to be offered a job at all. Ultimately, if we are still getting a paycheck at the end of two weeks, we should be able to ride out this storm. But man, how did we get ourselves into this mess??



at 12/18/2008 12:06:52 AM, x23 said:
What is point of freezing salaries and cutting benefits if the overpaid C-level execs are perceived as incompetent? It doesn't matter if the C-level execs take a voluntary pay cut or not, or if the entire workforce is handed a compensation cut.
If the company cannot turn around, everybody is going to take a 100% pay cut. An inspiring leader can marshal his co-workers, and potentially get the balance sheet to black again.
Question is are Brown and Jha the right people for the task?



at 12/18/2008 4:26:58 AM, Raja said:
Job Cuts and Pay cuts is nothing but the punishment to most of the employees for the mistakes done by very few employees.

Despite any economic conditions, rich are getting richer and poor are getting poorer. So there is always a business oppurtunity to get success and money



at 12/18/2008 7:35:14 AM, Rick said:
If I hear one more person say "we are in a comopetitive world"... As I look back over my 20 plus yrs of service to America corporations, I worked long hours, did everything asked of me, completed assignments within budget and ahead of schedule, yet my compensation grew smaller and smaller each year, but outsourcing, so Mgm't could get their huge salaries and bonuses, caused me to lose my job. I'm mad because the "mass" is again paying the price for the greedy execs and now the US is suffering from this greed. Just look at Goldman-Sachs, they made over 2 billion last year and then moved their money offshore and only has to pay 1% in taxes this year. Now they are asking for a tax payer rescue. GREED!



at 12/18/2008 9:07:36 AM, marcelito69 said:
Hi guys...are you insane??
First of all: you complain about outsorcing? YOU invented the game rules...
YOU invented "globalization"
and worst of all and parent of all your ruins, YOU invented STOCKs!!(and EPS , and ever growing profit !!!)
Dont you understand that this crisis was caused just by a dozen of brillant guru's from wall street??? why dont you get them and make them pay back???



at 12/18/2008 3:01:37 PM, PM locked said:
A CEO lover mentioned below about a $1 salary, which I bet received a $1 million bonus for doing poorly.



at 12/29/2008 12:39:34 PM, HD_43 said:
As "About to start my life at Moto" said how did occur? I remember King Moto from the late 80''s with a world work force of 240000 people, a company that lead technology. There must have been the crew of Titantic at the helm for the last couple of decades. Are they being held accountable?

I also agree that many companies are decaying by chasing immediate profits at the expense of long-term planning. Also, I feel that it has hurt us by the US allowing trade to become a one way street coming in.

As a father of 3, I know I want my paycheck, and with that being dangled over my head I would tend to chose that carrot in the short term but in the long term are would it be better for Motorola to maintain competetive benefits and cut more positions. Should we concede to losing our pension/401K matching benefits as the norm? I know Motorola wants to retain talent, but cutting benefits like that will have engineers avoiding them like the plague after this economic cycle recovers.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy