Zibb

Ed SperlingOffering news and business analysis for the design engineer, Managing News Editor Suzanne Deffree filters the electronics industry's developments and trends to explain how what's happening in the board room today can impact the tech innovation of tomorrow.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

News Center Articles

Blog

Friday, February 15, 2008

Nokia, Qualcomm working out legal issues or just phoning it in?

Feb 15 2008 6:39AM | Permalink |Comments (4) |


Lawyers at Nokia and Qualcomm may soon have some free time on their hands. The two cell phone chip giants are close to an agreement on how to proceed with their massive legal battle going forward, according to reports out this morning from Barcelona, where the Mobile World Congress concluded yesterday.

The two have been fighting over issues related to a 2001 patent-licensing agreement, which expired in April 2007. Originally a Delaware case, the arbitration spread to the ITC and overseas.

It’s your basic he said, she said clash, where each company has at different points claimed its 3G patents are being infringed upon. At a court’s urging, Nokia and Qualcomm have been working to negotiate an agreement in which the arbitration would be consolidated into the Delaware case, according to reports.

It’s yet to be seen if the two companies are just “phoning it in” or if they will rein in their years-long and geographically swelling legal conflicts without further court intercession. But doing so would put some investor minds at ease. Both companies have devoted tremendous time and resources to their battles in the court room (Qualcomm even devotes part of its web site to legal news) and investors have openly commented on the expense.

Such an agreement wouldn’t hurt Qualcomm’s reputation, either. Besides battling with Nokia, it’s fought with Broadcom, and is dealing with complaints filed with the Korea Fair Trade Commission and the Japan Fair Trade Commission. I’m reminded of an interview I did when I first started covering news at Electronic News some five years back when Qualcomm’s attitude was described to me as “what’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is mine” by one of its smaller competitors.

And, hey, remember what it’s all supposed to be about in the end: innovation. Imagine where the cellular world would be if these two put the same energy they put into legal fights into their technology. 

Share your thoughts on the Nokia-Qualcomm legal situation below.

--Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News


Reader Comments



at 2/15/2008 1:49:31 PM, surflust said:
if nokia wants to play, they will have to pay.



at 2/15/2008 2:43:11 PM, anon said:
Nothing in life is free.

If people are going to take your technology without compensating you for it (what Nokia is trying to do) then you have no incentive to innovate and push that technology forward.



at 2/17/2008 10:38:46 AM, John said:
This is not about innovation it is about exploiting IP adopted by a standards body. If the rewards to the IP holder was based on the value of the IP that failed to get into the standard it would then recognise the value added by the standard.



at 2/19/2008 9:45:00 AM, sg said:
First comments miss the point. Nokia''s done lots of innovation and Qualcomm blatenly uses their patents with no compensation what so ever. Qualcomm wants everyone to pay them, but refuses to pay anyone else, instead uses their patents in a monopolistic, anti-trust way.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites