Jul 17 2008 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (17) |
Blog This! using: Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us
Well, there’s at least one positive side effect of our rising gas prices. Engineering jobs.
That’s according to a Yahoo HotJobs article this week that points to the power sectors like wind and solar as “hot” spots for engineering gigs.
Citing the US Bureau of Labor Statistics among its sources, the article claims engineers who can find better ways to capture air, solar, and wind energy will be in high demand as oil prices continue to rise. Al Gore said something to that affect at the 2007 Embedded Systems Conference in San Jose where he claimed the “climate crisis” could be an opportunity to attract a new generation of engineers who will, basically, then be called undo the damage their parent’s and grandparent’s generations did.
And while the “duh factor” on the Yahoo article’s employment demand statement is pretty high, so is the expected engineering job growth rate at 11% through 2016. That 11% is especially high when you consider the above-average salaries EEs pull in (that is, above average compared to say an insurance agent, graphic designer, etc.) and the United States shift toward stagnant or lower wages.
The Yahoo article also brings up nuclear engineers who make plants run more efficiently. When did nuclear come back as an acceptable energy source? EDN’s Paul Rako touches on nuclear in a June Anablog post “Another electric car company, another refutation,” and readers of the blog had some colorful responses, some against the source and some, like reader “Semiman,” for it.
“The engineer in me sees a 3x change in battery capacity swinging the odds in favor of the full electric [car]. I could be wrong. If I am right, we need to plan on building the infrastructure to support it. NUCLEAR POWER ... There I said it. I will take it over burning any fossil fuel or biofuel,” Semiman commented on June 10.
We’ve asked readers of this blog before if they would encourage their kids to enter engineering. The answer is almost always ‘no,’ with readers citing low salaries and a general disrespect from society at large for STEM careers. But considering the “green” movement and all the praise it, as well as the energy-saving and environmentally friendly product designs behind it, have received in recent months, would you encourage your kids to enter the power sectors? Do you believe our oil drain and climate crisis (or whatever you’d like to call it) are enough to encourage general society knowledge of and respect for what EEs bring to the table, and are they further enough to continue job engineering growth beyond 2016? Specifically regarding nuclear, is the future so bright that our next generation engineers gotta wear shades or will the public energy behind nuclear this time around be as brief as Timbuk 3’s career?
Share your thoughts below.
--Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News