Zibb

Ed SperlingOffering news and business analysis for the design engineer, Managing News Editor Suzanne Deffree filters the electronics industry's developments and trends to explain how what's happening in the board room today can impact the tech innovation of tomorrow.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

News Center Articles

Blog

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Will new blood bring life back to AMD?

May 13 2008 11:55AM | Permalink |Comments (4) |


AMD has gotten itself a transfusion of sorts, promoting execs and hiring an outsider, as it reorganizes its engineering core.

The MPU maker after Monday’s closing bell announced that Mario Rivas, formerly executive VP of the computing solutions group, has resigned to “pursue other opportunities.” Rivas, one of the execs who in December stood before analysts apologizing for the company’s Barcelona design botch,  follows former AMD CTO Phil Hester out the door. Hester exited AMD in April, right after the company announced a 10% layoff.

CEO Hector Ruiz hinted at executive changes last week during the company’s annual meeting of stockholders when he told the community to “expect to see new blood, increased focus, experienced leadership, and stronger execution” as AMD in 2008 moves to “continuing profitability … through good times and bad times.”

I’ve stated (to much disagreement from the EE community) that AMD needs to get its house in order and get back on a secure track for profitability before it can move on and fully benefit from any design innovations. And while I continue to believe that AMD’s best bet for that would be to sell off all or most of its manufacturing assets, allowing it a major cash infusion and the ability to better focus on design, this week’s news could be a step toward a proper reorganization.

AMD promoted Randy Allen to head its computing solutions group, forming a central engineering organization to be co-led by veteran engineering executives Chekib Akrout and Jeff VerHeul. The new group is tasked with directing the development and execution of AMD’s technology and product roadmaps in partnership with its business units and could, assuming AMD soundly executes the move, provide the company with a more solid core structure than it has had in the past.

It is also encouraging to see AMD sourcing execs with experience at its partners IBM and Freescale. The trio of companies have worked very closely in upstate New York on manufacturing initiatives and the execs, presumably, are familiar with the inner and outer workings of AMD. If Sunnyvale, Calif-based AMD does sell off its fabs, ex-IBM execs in house could support a closer relationship between AMD and IBM’s East Fishkill, NY, fab.

For more on the reorg and execs, see our related news story “AMD creates central engineering organization as Rivas resigns,” but in short: Allen is a 24-year AMD veteran was most recently responsible for the company’s server and workstation business. Akrout joins AMD after serving as VP of design technology at Freescale, prior to which he worked at IBM where he was responsible for Big Blue’s work on the development of the Cell processor. VerHeul also has IBM experience under his belt and joined AMD in August 2005 after a 25-year career with the Armonk, NY-based company.

Will the new blood and central engineering group help bring life back to AMD? Share your thoughts on the executive and organizational changes below.


--Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News


Reader Comments



at 5/13/2008 1:59:42 PM, Nathan Brookwood said:
Real Men Have Fabs

Why do so many people think AMD would be better off fabless?

Fabless companies must split the gross profit (sales price less manufacturing expense) derived from a sale with a third party; that leaves less for AMD. Further, when competing with Intel, AMD would have higher variable costs for its chips, so Intel could almost always undercut AMD's prices whenever they wanted to.

AMD may want to find other ways to finance its fabs, but it cannot be competitive with Intel if it goes fabless.



at 5/13/2008 6:52:34 PM, gary said:
The buck stops at the top, getting rid of vp's may or may not be a solution.. ultimately Ruiz has to take responsibility for those folks..
I know some folks at Motorola/Freescale who finally thought they had a chance at a turn around when Ruiz left.
Practially speaking dumping all the underlings is a great strategy
to defer responsibility and blame.
The buck DOES stop with Ruiz who was in a position to make changes/rather than excuses before now.
As an AMD fan I am disappointed that this just looks like AMD reinventing new ways to fail.



at 5/14/2008 8:48:33 PM, Scunnerous said:
It was my understanding that the license agreement AMD has with Intel for x86 CPUs limits the level of outsourcing allowed and that the Charter contract takes up that quota. I don''t see how AMD can contemplate outsourcing to TSMC in any way at all: 1) TSMC does not have the advanced technology to do something so complex as a Phenom - they just don''t play in that ballpark



at 5/14/2008 8:58:37 PM, Scunnerous said:
This editing box is a PITA - it lost half my post:...
2) I hardly think IBM is going to want to allow TSMC to just take over its most advanced SOI process. I guess it's always possible that Fusion will be a bulk CMOS process but that would also indicate a low ASP product. To survive, AMD just HAS to play the process game with high ASP products with their OWN process, albeit with collaboration with IBM. As good as it was, Opteron is tired now and AMD needs to, late as it is, answer Core 2 with a refresh/revamp of its basic x86-64 micro-architecture - there's no other way. Since executive shuffling/shedding is "in fashion" now at AMD, I have to think that Hector has played his game and lost - his time is not for long now... Goodbye Hector!


Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites