Zibb

Ed SperlingOffering news and business analysis for the design engineer, Managing News Editor Suzanne Deffree filters the electronics industry's developments and trends to explain how what's happening in the board room today can impact the tech innovation of tomorrow.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

News Center Articles

Blog

Monday, September 29, 2008

Tech stocks, and innovation, torpedoed after bailout package fails in House

Sep 29 2008 5:30PM | Permalink |Comments (9) |


Somewhere between 2pm and 2:30pm eastern news that the House had rejected the $700 billion Wall Street rescue plan began to spread on Monday. And as it did, stocks fell and tech stocks fell hard.

As the Dow Jones Industrial Average took a direct hit and sank by more than 750 points in the day's trading, companies like Apple, AMD, Google, and Intel all saw their stocks go tumbling down by double digits. Apple, AAPL, collapsed by nearly 18% and $22.98 to close at $105.26. AMD closed this afternoon down almost 17% at a meager $4.29. Google, GOOG, dropped more than $50 or 11.6% to close at $381. Intel, INTC, fared better, falling just more than 10% to $17.27.

The Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Sector Index (an index of 19 large semiconductor stocks, also known as SOXX) dropped 8.8% or more than 28 points in the day's trading to a new 52-week low value of 293.31.

This blog entry marks the third week that coverage of the overall stock market has been warranted for a tech-focused publication like EDN. And the signs say that the market hasn't hit bottom yet, not even close.

Bill McClean at IC Insights sent out an industry update this afternoon (See "IC Insights cautious, but still sees 2008 growth" for our news coverage.) Wisely sprinkling words like "realistically" throughout the update, IC Insights reported that ASPs (average selling prices) are down, so even though unit shipments are expected to climb as much as 9% in 2008 compared to 2007, sales growth is suffering.

In the update, the research company reports, "While the volatility in the US stock markets … may be a precursor to a significant slowdown or recession in the US economy, historically, the annual change in the Dow Jones Industrial Average has not had a very good correlation with worldwide semiconductor market growth." The update offered the below chart as proof.

That's true. The semiconductor market isn't always spot on with the Dow, and of note in the chart is that over the measured time period the semiconductor market's CAGR (compound annual growth rate) was higher than that of the Dow.

But we're in a much different situation than we have been in previous economic cycles. Consumer electronics have not played as large a role in the semiconductor market's well being in the past. Nor have they influenced ASPs as heavily; semiconductor ASPs are down in large part because consumer electronics demand low retail prices for sales. Would the iPod enjoy as widespread popularity as it is does now if it came at a $500 price tag?

For decades, companies like Intel have had business backing the PCs its chips were used in. Now, Intel gets much more of its revenue than it did before from consumer models. And as we move into what will be a recession, if not a depression, business as well as consumer spending will be pinched.

It's for that reason, that the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) beseeched Washington to come to an agreement this morning before the House slammed down the $700 billion bailout package in a 228 to 205 vote. 

“CEA on behalf of the vibrant technology industry urges the Administration and Congress to agree on a plan which will bring stability and confidence to our capital markets. Our economy depends on corporations and banks lending each other money and confidence needs to be restored so that overnight lending can allow business to continue and payrolls to be met," Gary Shapiro, CEA president and CEO, said in a statement this morning.

And here's the rub (and the reason why this blog continued its non-tech financial focus this week):

“CEA represents the corporate leaders in innovation and believes the US must remain a beacon for inventors around the world. Innovation creates jobs and requires stable capital markets and vibrant free markets that encourage investment,” Shapiro continued. 

When stocks slide and spending gets squeezed, companies look to make cuts. Look for more torpedoes to hit in the form of layoff announcements in the next month as semiconductor companies begin to report on the September quarter. Also expect cuts to 2009 R&D budgets as Q4 progresses. Less engineers and less research resources means less innovation. That, in turn, sinks competitive advantage and profits for stockholders.

As always, your comments are welcome. Share your thoughts on the bailout package rejection, the influence of consumer electronics on the semiconductor market's economic stability, and the overall impact on innovation below.

--Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News







Reader Comments



at 9/30/2008 3:56:40 AM, Helena Handbasket said:
So let me get this right - the House of Representatives would rather see the worlds stock markets crash and burn before compromising on precious free market dogma? What an utter, utter mess. Japan managed to get itself out of a similar disaster a few years back by the process of confession/bailout/improved business practice, but now they'll be dragged back down too through loans to US banks. I do hope the H of R are more pragmatic when they reconvene.



at 9/30/2008 7:56:30 AM, Seven said:
It fell 777.7 points or 7% because we didn't give them 70x10^7 dollars. It's a conspiracy.



at 9/30/2008 9:33:24 AM, Meredith Poor said:
"Japan managed to get itself out of a similar disaster a few years back..." I'm not sure Japan is out of the woods. It appears that we're making the same mistake Japan made, which is to let bad debt weigh down banking institutions indefinitely. However, American banks have to communicate their financial status accurately, which the Japanese never expected. ~~~
If one considers that the average house is over 30 years old, then one could conclude that half of all the houses in the US are 'paid for' in the sense that their original mortgage was retired. The question is how many people used their house to secure further borrowing, and did they borrow so much that they're at risk of losing their house? ~~~
I severely doubt most of the people really suffering through this will have learned much. Once we've purged ourself of this particular insanity we'll do it again. Betcha.



at 9/30/2008 1:58:52 PM, desert rat said:
Well, folks. The semi markets are in maturity. Since 60%+ of all semis shipped in 2007 went into consumer junk, it is also a commodity high-volume/low-margin market now (ie, the volumes of parts are rising while revenues are falling). Want to kill the semi industry? There's no better way than the path semi is on now.

Also, go look at the "bathtub" curves of semi devices over the years (the failure rates over time). Seems the latest geometry devices just wear-out in about 18 months (on average). Metal migration seems to be the culprit, with all the small-geo features. So, any piece of consumer electronics junk will croak just after the warranty is over (much like the trashy cars made in Detroit these days). And you can surely see the future of semi by looking at the state of the auto industry today.

So, maturity and commoditization are rampant in semi, while the reliability of the devices they are making are falling like a refrigerator down an elevator shaft. All these problems have nothing to do with the present financial crisis They are self-inflicted by the semi industry. Also, go look at the articles that state that from the present 450-500 semi makers, less than 50 will survive in the next 5 years or so. Then compare that to all the semi M&A underway right now announced in this newsletter in just the past few months.

So, semi may be growing in the volumes of devices shipped, but the revenues are falling at the same time, the quality of the devices are declining precipitously, the end markets for semis are mostly commodity price-driven markets now. Once you swallow all that, then talk to me about "innovation". The only innovation I have seen for the past few years in semi is in creative accounting. How many companies are on the carpet for backdating stock options or some other nefarious behavior?. The Semi industry is starting to look like the telecom equipment makers of early 2000....and most of those companies are gone, or are in serious financial difficulty.



at 9/30/2008 2:59:37 PM, Munichtexan said:
There has been much press by President Bush, Senator Dood and others that the "sky is falling". Please review Senator Dood's history and that of President Bush if you believe that bail out of the financial interests are in the best interest of all Americans.

A bail out of the financial institutions on Wall street will not address the financial health of American Citizens. Real income has declined while expenses have climbed.

Look at HR 6899 and other legislation which addresses alternatives to Foreign oil imports and public transportation if you truly want a strong financial market. A bailout of financial institutions will not positively impact the stock market or other markets.

Reducing the outlay of US dollars and jobs overseas is what is necessary. But I am not idealistic. This requires real manufacturing in the United States not junk electronics. Support of a Real Public transportation system, Wind and Solar Energies and a smart Nationwide Electrical grid generates real jobs not fictitious "trickle down economics" and will move a mature electronics industry out of the junk market into a long term sustained growth area.



at 9/30/2008 4:01:07 PM, desert rat said:
Munichtexan makes a point. But, the accelerated failure of the semi market, and the true underlying reasons for it, will be masked by the present financial crisis. And, As Darwin suggests, the weak will die off first. The semi CEOs will point to the financial situation as the culprit, not the real reasons, for the mediocrity and decline in semi.

Rest assured that once this bailout is done (no matter what it looks like), we will never go back to the previous credit conditions, the conditions of unbridled growth in semi-based products, or to the profit margins of the past.

Welcome to the "Brave New World" (I think it was A. Huxley who coined that term).



at 9/30/2008 4:53:50 PM, Be Patient said:
Ahhhh, grasshopper. Patience is key. Check this link out.

query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print



at 10/1/2008 2:39:08 AM, winux38 said:
I agree with desert rat CEO in semi will use crisis ti heide the real problem, and I know what I mean as I worked in a semi company. Even if french leaving in France I agree with munichtexan, we need in US and in Europe real manufacturing and the challenge the planet is facing now is far more important than real consumer devices. We have to push our executives whatever the compnay we work in to think about people people and people and forget a bit excel whihc is my view the worst software never put in hands of people. I as well beleive it is time to replace execuitves by housewife who perfectly know how to make a budget, control expenses with a lot of pragmatism and good sense.All this plans to save we don't know what at the end seem to me very virtual. The real thing I see , and I guess it is the same for most of you , is that basics goods are more and more expensive, I have less and less money and no guarantee of work in my company even it makes profits, it is time to stop and to come back to real values and to ask the real question to ourselves: what is the world we want to leave to our kids??



at 10/9/2008 11:02:26 AM, Helena Handbasket said:
This thread has gone a bit quiet. It''s still too early to tell what the ultimate outcome of this global crisis will be, but it''s a certainty that the banking system won''t be the same again. The current banking setup is the Bretton Woods system [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system], founded by Roosevelt and Churchill after WW2, and while it''s served ''till now, we''ve gone and broken it. It''s time for something better, and I''d be happy with tighter controls if that leads to a stable system and sustainable, if slower, growth. (Aside) - winux38, there is a precedent for housewife fiscal policy, as that was a central tenet of British ex-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher''s original campaign policy in 1979. Her and Reagan deregulated the markets, leading to the high growth of the 90s (except for the poor, who mostly got poorer), and this ultimately led us to the current crash. OK, household budgets aren''t normally so over-leveraged...

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites