Ed SperlingOffering news and business analysis for the design engineer, Managing News Editor Suzanne Deffree filters the electronics industry's developments and trends to explain how what's happening in the board room today can impact the tech innovation of tomorrow.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

News Center Articles

Blog

Thursday, September 25, 2008

China buddies up to EU as promise of low-cost labor begins to fade

Sep 25 2008 6:31PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (8) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


As the $700 billion bailout package moves through, China and the European Union (EU) linked arms today, bracing themselves for fallout from our economy.

With a looming US economic state that the government is now admitting may soon be an official recession -- and one that some analysts suggest could lead to a greater depression if the next administration doesn't pull America out of its slump -- the two world powers are putting aside their differences and are opening up trade somewhat. The trade chiefs for the EU and China have reach "points of consensus," according to Reuters, on things like IP rights.

They claim to be doing so to strengthen the global economy in the face of turmoil and the agreement comes despite the EU filing 12 anti-dumping cases aimed at Chinese imports last year, some of which included cases on technologies like energy-saving light bulbs. 

China's arm linking with the EU is wise; it need all the trade friends it can get right now, as its own economy isn't as great as it used to be. Exports are slowing (although still remain high comparatively), and inflation as well as a housing slump have begun, squeezing the Chinese.

To thwart that, the Chinese government has been readying laws that better respect workers and could see minimum wage upped. That's great for human rights, but no so great for the electronics companies that rely on China's cheap labor.

The cost of fuel across the globe is also on the rise, and moving components and goods from China to point B needs to be taken into consideration when looking to the future of manufacturing.

As it becomes more expensive to manufacture in China, end product prices will rise and they will do so during a time when US consumers may be forced to decide between increasingly expensive necessities like milk and gas or buying a new cell phone.

China, which had once promised to provide cheap labor and manufacturing for the electronic supply chain for decades out, may soon lose its low-cost appeal, weakening the argument for outsourcing jobs and manufacturing there.

It's doubtful, though, that those jobs will come back to the US. While we have the talent, few states welcome manufacturing in a way that benefits business (ie with significant tax breaks, land loans, low cost of living, etc). California's practices have driven many companies out and whilst New York has IBM encouraging a "silicon alley," even rural upstate NY is costly compared to, say, Vietnam

What do you think? Share your thoughts on the global economy's impact on tech, the future role China will play in our electronic supply chain, and the EU-China "consensus" below.

--Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News


Reader Comments


at 9/26/2008 2:10:42 PM, Chris PE said:
Global economy was a term created to cover increasing greed.We currently see results of that greed.Nobody counts anymore - only shareholders.Since greed is highly contagious to most of people, we are in not too good situation , unless "shareholders" start to think out of the box(with the money in it) ,but I have big doubts about it.Once greedy , always greedy.

at 9/26/2008 2:28:41 PM, Policebox said:
Contrary to what Chris PE said, what we are seeing now is a thoroughly expected shift. I admit that the fuel pinch came faster than I expected, but we have been using it faster than finding it for decades, it had to happen sometime. We are simply running out of resources, and we haven't planned for it. The rest is simple economics. It isn't greed to run a business economically, it is good sense. Greed is charging more than you need to or sacrificing quality to maintain margins. Admittedly some companies are doing that, but it has nothing to do with using the least expensive available resources. Failure to do that is to price yourself out of the market. When you use low priced labor, you pump money into their economy, improve their quality of living, and their price goes up because they aren't as needy. In other words, the rising cost of labor in China is expected. I predicted it years ago. Again, I didn't expect it to happen so soon.

at 9/26/2008 2:53:12 PM, Meredith Poor said:
Somehow this business of throwing $700 billion at banks to 'prevent' a recession is mind-numbing. One does not legislate the elminiation of economic downturns, one can only hold them off at exponentially increasing expense. A recession burns the dead wood out of the forest. Businesses that should no longer be around die. People that should no longer be doing things they're doing quit doing them. The labor market frees up so that new businesses have ready and willing people at their disposal. It's terrifying, but healthy. I want to see every Congressperson that votes for this lose their job... and their retirement.

at 9/26/2008 3:38:44 PM, Steve said:
No doubt, Wall St and corporate excutive greed has much to do with America's decline. It was this greed that brought on the dot com bust of early 2000's. Since the bust, Wall St and executive greed forced corporations to outsource everything to China, India and elsewhere so corporations could meet Wall St earnings estimates. Again, it was the same greed that resulted in the current financial meltdown which brought pain to common people in America and indeed around the world. Some people believe that the free market market system will correct itself. Can we afford this kind of greed?

at 9/26/2008 4:34:09 PM, Aaron said:
Agreed. Greed is the main source of it all. Some executive lays off American employees and then gets a nice bonus for it. As a shareholder, I think a publicly traded company CEO or President should make a 6 figure salary and some kind of bonus structure, but when that bonus structure is in the millions and then giving a bonus to guy that's basically getting fired in criminal. I'm a shareholder and I don't want that CEO to get 40 million, I want a piece of that in my divend... America has lost thousands of jobs. You can't look at the unemployment rate of America as a baseline. Lots of people do get jobs after losing a good one, but they don't make as much and they typically have no benefits. I work at a large company and I can say that the company could be run a lot better than it is, but these executives can't figure out what to do so they decide, well, let's ship manufacturing overseas and save some money. Sending jobs overseas or down to Mexico in my opinion, is a failure of management, not a progression of economics.

at 9/26/2008 9:07:39 PM, munichtexan said:
Listening to the debate tonight, I was sorely disappointed. Neither candidate really has a clue. Each candidate pointed again and again to petrodollar damage, but never discussed what really needs to be done. Not a bail out of Wall street, but hard investments in Public Transportation, Alternative Energies and Alternative fuels. Electric trains, trams, and buses would definately dent the import of Foreign oil, whereas smart electrical grid infrastructure and alternatives to foreign oil would curb not only America's appetite for oil, but also start bringing jobs back to the USA. Bail out of the financial institutions will not bring jobs back to America.

at 9/29/2008 9:27:14 AM, Bobsound said:
Chris PE says, "Nobody counts anymore, only the sharholders". I contend that even the shareholders do not count anymore, unless you are a Rocketfeller. The only people that count are the CEO's and Executives that manipulate the earnings so that they get the maximum payout for themselves and the shareholders and their 401K's can go to hell. That's the worst kind of greed.

at 9/29/2008 10:31:17 AM, Rob said:
The reader comments indicate understandable anger over the US recession, the $700B bailout, and the global economy. However, I disagree that corporate greed is the major root of the problem. Some history: In 1999, the Clinton Administration put pressure on Fannie Mae to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people (a noble objective). Unfortunately, they did this by reducing the down payment requirements and loosening the financial rules regarding the ability of borrowers to repay the loans. These subprime loans have wreaked havoc on the US financial system, resulting in the current situation. The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates (near 40%) of all major economic countries, and our tax system is also one of the most complex ones. The globalization of capitol has made it easy for investors to cross national boarders. High tax nations are loosing investors and hence businesses & jobs. Wake up, Socialism doesn’t work (history has proven this also). "A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.