Apr 9 2008 11:27AM | Permalink |Comments (41) |
US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced Tuesday that it has received enough H-1B petitions to meet the congressionally mandated cap for fiscal year 2009.
And given the more than 70 comments posted to EDN’s recent blog “Wanted or not, H-1B visa process starts on April 1,” it’s safe to say that our readers have reached their limits when it comes to H-1Bs. It’s a rare occurrence when our EE-based audience chimes in so heavily on a topic, especially in our non-tech news blog Now Hear This!. In fact out of the total 83 Now Hear This! entries, only one other post has garnered more comments (see “EEs have terrorist mindset, Oxford University paper suggests”).
Here are the facts from the USCIS this week:
More or less, the competition for these visas has become fierce and so has the argument on them. While many of our blog readers feel the artificial caps are “ridiculous” and should be removed, many still feel the caps should be upheld and reduced. Some comments suggest that foreign workers should not be allowed to compete for United States jobs at all and that there is no shortage of homegrown talent.
Interestingly, many of our readers boiled this issue down to one of supply and demand, suggesting that here in the US we already have too many EEs to keep salaries and employment high.
Reader Peter J. Merkin on April 1 said: “Lets face it, engineers are a commodity. If there truly was a ‘shortage,’ wages would rise and companies would not dump them when they turn 50. When the CEO of Bear Stearns get $380 million of taxpayer money on the way out the door after corkscrewing his company into the ground, we are lectured to by the MBA's the ‘Well, you have to pay for talent.’ If engineers are needed, companies will ‘pay for talent.’ Until then, the only occupations with a future are: business (MBA), medicine, or law.”
“Engineers at my company get treated like line workers, but we put in many more hours/day. As long as H-1B visas continue to get extended, wages will remain low, respect low, and fewer will look to the field of engineering for a career. I agree we're in a global economy and diversification is good, but there needs to be a firm limit,” a reader who identified himself as Tom said on March 31.
Also on March 31, reader Bill99 commented: “It is not a shortage of engineering talent in this country. It is that there is a shortage of talent that talent so desperate that they will work for the slave labor that the wealthy are willing to pay. To top things off, if we do not get the influx of desperate foreign engineers, those companies will outsource the jobs even if means compromising national security by allowing our technology and tax base to go abroad. They seem willing to risk our very economic structure for their greed. The wealthy never seem to realize that the future of our nation is at risk when they participate in the race to the bottom salary. Henry Ford paid his employees a salary that allowed them to afford to buy his product. Our MBAs seem to have forgotten that.”
The argument has been raging on for more than a week now in our original blog post. Bravo to all of our readers who have voiced their opinions on this very important topic. Congress and the USCIS may not be listening, but your peers certainly are. And your comments continue to be welcomed. Share your thoughts on the USCIS’ update on H-1Bs this week or the overall engineer employment situation below.
--Suzanne Deffree, Managing Editor, News