Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Friday, June 17, 2005

Advanced Video Codecs: The Key to Continued Red Laser-Based Optical Storage Dominance?

Jun 17 2005 3:27PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (5) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


In an outcome that doesn't even remotely surprise me, the Blu-ray and HD-DVD camps have again declined to merge their contending blue laser-based storage approaches. This conclusion (at least for the moment; everything changes, after all) puts an interesting twist on my upcoming optical storage article, and it forces potential users to make a choice. Which technology, for example, will a movie studio bet on?

Will it be Blu-ray, which adopts a riskier clean-slate approach that promises higher per-layer capacity and has the backing of big players like Dell, HP, Philips, Pioneer, and Sony (with its Playstation 3)? Or will it be the Toshiba- and DVD Forum-backed HD-DVD, with lower (but claimed still 'good enough') per-layer storage capacity but a cost-saving DVD media legacy? The studios are clearly eager to encourage consumers to re-buy high definition variants of content they already own on DVD (and to buy more expensive HD versions of content they don't yet own), but they're understandably uncomfortable with the prospect of advocating that consumers buy expensive next-generation players that won't play other studios' material.

But they have a third option, one which I'm betting they'll sooner or later choose if the standards standoff continues past the end of next year (i.e. if both Blu-ray and HD-DVD are still strongly present in the market by the end of 2006). That alternative is to release HD versions of movies on red laser media (DVD), but encoded with a more modern video codec than MPEG-2. Options include the newly released DivX 6, MPEG-4 AVC (aka MPEG-4 part 10, or H.264) and Windows Media Video 9 (aka VC-1). DVD players from companies like Buffalo, I-O DATA, and JVC (and maybe, someday, V Inc) already support one or multiple of these codecs. In fact, you can already buy several Hollywood movies in WMV HD DVD format, although none of the current generation of players supports the necessary authorization DRM scheme, meaning that you need to play them on a PC.

DivX v6, which I first saw prototyped at January's CES, touts a content-dependent 20-40% quality-vs-bitrate improvement over the v5 codec (as measured by PSNR testing, not subjective analysis or a more advanced tool like Sarnoff's JNDmetrix-IQ) while remaining bitstream backwards-compatible. Other added superset features, implemented by v6-compliant players, include interactive video menus, chapters, subtitles, alternate audio tracks and video tags. DivX video is a proprietary enhancement of the MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile codec; certified content is bundled with two-channel MP3 audio (with MP3 Surround 'coming soon') but it's also possible to combine DivX video with an alternative audio codec such as multi-channel Dolby Digital or DTS. And according to DivX's lead codec engineer, Jerome Rota, most 720p (720-line progressive scan) content requires only a 4 Mbps average bitrate, while 1080p content demands only 6-8 Mbps, on par with (or only slightly higher than) today's 480-line standard definition bitrates using MPEG-2.

With Nero Digital, on the other hand, Nero (formerly Ahead Software) is aggressively attempting to brand an extension-based enhancement of MPEG-4 AVC. Nero, like DivX, has already branded a proprietary spin of MPEG-4 Advanced Simple, albeit in this case with a MPEG-4 approved AAC audio codec and 'wrapper'. And Microsoft's potential success with WMV9 should not be discounted; it's been talking to Hollywood for years, and Media Center Edition-powered PC shipments are rapidly ramping. Yes, consumers will likely need to buy a new player in order to experience any of these new video codecs and their associated audio codecs, DRM schemes and 'wrapper' formats in their living rooms, but it'll at least initially be a much cheaper player than the blue laser-based alternative. And here's the key; anyone with a DVD-ROM drive in his or her PC has already got a player and can experience this content today.

Hardware companies want to sell consumers expensive and profitable new gear. Media companies want to sell and up-sell consumers on high-definition movies as quickly and easily as possible. The two groups have divergent needs in the looming blue laser era. This'll be fun to watch; how are you placing your bets?


Reader Comments


at 6/23/2005 11:11:46 AM, Greg said:
Fun to watch? Are you kidding? Hologram technology has been available for over a decade, now demonstrated to store 1000 GB on a disc, and they're still teasing us with the already-old blue laser stuff at 1/30th that capacity. DVD technology is OLD and 4.7 gigs is NOT a lot of space anymore. How am I supposed to archive 250gigs of video? I'm looking forward to 1 and 2 terabyte drives in the near future--how is divX going to help me run a backup? I think many smart people are too interested in details and missing the big picture.

at 6/23/2005 12:43:53 PM, Brian Dipert said:
Holographic storage technology has been demonstrated on-and-off for years but is not yet in production; even InPhase admits this (they now claim 'sometime in 2006' for their first-generation 300GB drives and media). I grant you that blue laser optical storage will be useful to back up large hard drives (competing to some degree with tape in the enterprise, and with HDD-to-HDD backup)....but my blog post discussed what will likely be the predominant near-term volume application for blue laser optical discs, and the one which is therefore receiving the majority of the focus from both the Blu-ray and HD-DVD camps; movies (as was the case with DVD-Video; writeable and rewriteable DVDs have only recently achieved substantial shipment volumes, and in that regard are mostly used to make copies of DVD-Video content).

at 7/18/2006 6:40:29 AM, Holographic four D said:
When can we expect home holographic "theater(On a stage viewed from any angle) type " The so called "Holodeck in miniture? David grants@pei.sympatico .ca

at 7/18/2006 6:40:39 AM, Holographic four D said:
When can we expect home holographic "theater(On a stage viewed from any angle) type " The so called "Holodeck in miniture? David grants@pei.sympatico .ca

at 10/14/2007 3:14:00 AM, ADX said:
Well Greg. Blu-ray and HD-DVD are consumer formats, while Hologaphic Disks are currently in development for Industrial use. Example would be for larch data archiving or creating large didgital masters of full length movies. The Movie Industry would use holographic disks to store movies in 2K and 4K resolutions which surpasses consumer grade resolutions of 1080p. So when you go to a movie theater, the digital cinema will be at a 4k resolution. This is purposfully done so that the BOx office ticket sales will stay dominant compared to the Home Video Market.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.