Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Thin-Air ATSC (And NTSC): Encouraging (Albeit Erratic) Early Results

Jul 30 2008 1:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (6) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


Although at the beginning of the year I professed my non-interest in pursuing over-the-air television service at my surrounded-by-mountains residence, less than one week later I was reconsidering my decision. That's because at CES I connected with Antennas Direct, who promised me evaluation hardware once the company's ClearStream products were in production.

To wit, last week I received review units of the ClearStream 1 (rated for a 30-mile reception range, per the product packaging's promotional tagline, with 8 dBi gain) and ClearStream 2 (50-mile range, 10 dBi gain). Although Reno's various broadcast antennas are only 30 miles (or less, depending on the station) away from me 'as the crow flies', the intermediary signal-attenuating mountain ranges between there and here convinced me to go with the beefier albeit slightly more expensive ClearStream2 model.

Speaking of mountains, in order to get the 'lay of the land' before proceeding with this review, hit up Google Maps for my residence address. Select 'Terrain' view, then zoom around so that you can find Reno to the west at a compass heading of ~45°, Mt. Rose to the southwest of Reno at ~85°, and Prosser Hill (along with Boca Hill right behind it) just a few miles to the east of me at ~75°. Also look for the Verdi Range between Reno and me, as well as the Bald Mountain Range to the northwest of it. All are key landmarks in the discussion that follows.

Here's the local broadcaster report (which, as you'll soon see, is incomplete) provided by AntennaWeb for my location:

DTV

Antenna Type

Call Sign

Channel

Network

City, State

Compass Heading

Miles From

Frequency Assignment

 

Red VHF

KRXI

11

Fox

Reno, NV

34°

22.9

11

X

Blue UHF

KRXI-DT

44.1 (post-Feb 2009 transition)

Fox

Reno, NV

34°

22.9

44

 

Blue VHF

KOLO

8

ABC

Reno, NV

87°

20.1

8

 

Blue VHF

KRNV

4

NBC

Reno, NV

44°

28.1

4

 

Blue VHF

KTVN

2

CBS

Reno, NV

91°

30

2

X

Blue UHF

KRXI-DT

11.1

Fox

Reno, NV

34°

22.9

44

 

Violet VHF

K06GB

6

ABC

Reno, NV

35°

21.9

6

X

Violet VHF

KOLO-DT

9.1 (post-Feb 2009 transition)

ABC

Reno, NV

87°

20.1

9

X

Violet VHF

KRNV-DT

4.1

NBC

Reno, NV

87°

20.1

7

 

Violet VHF

KNPB

5

PBS

Reno, NV

44°

28.2

5

X

Violet VHF

KOLO-DT

8.1

ABC

Reno, NV

87°

20.1

9

Note: The above listing is a conservative prediction of stations received. Depending on the specifics of your installation, you may be able to receive stations that do not appear in this list.

The color-coded antenna types in the above table reference the following descriptions:

  • Red: medium directional
  • Blue: medium directional with pre-amp
  • Violet: large directional with pre-amp

The ClearStream 2 packaging doesn't contain the requisite CEA/NAB color code stamp, and when I asked company founder and president Richard Schneider for classification data, here's what I got back:

We do not participate in the CEA color labeling program, but if you were going to try and draw an analogy I would call:

  • The Clearstream 1 small
  • The Clearstream 2 medium, and
  • The Clearstream 4 large.

But this designation is more relative to each other than to other manufactures. (They are electrically smaller, but significantly more efficient than our older designs)

Note, too, that I'm not (currently, at least) using a pre-amp signal booster in conjunction with the antenna. Keep that fact in mind as you interpret my results.

As a reminder, here's what my place looks like from the outside (pre-antenna installation):

My front door points straight at Mt. Rose's peak, therefore at a ~85° compass heading. And here's a close-up of the antenna installation:

The top of the antenna is ~2.5 feet above the horizontal beam it's mounted to, with the power line feed from the street ~3 feet above the antenna's upper edge. The antenna's compass orientation is ~60°, with the intention of 'splitting the difference' between the locations of the various Reno-area broadcast towers I'm attempting to tune in, as shown in the above table.

My home had existing coax wiring running from above the front door to the living room, and from there via an intermediary splitter to the upstairs bedroom. The front door-to-living room coax cable run is less than 50 feet long. In the living room, I disconnected the splitter and instead wired up an additional 10 feet of coax cable running to my NTSC- and ATSC-tuner-inclusive Syntax Olevia 237T 37" LCD TV. And at the front door, I disconnected the not-in-service cable television feed coming from the street and instead wired up the ClearStream 2 via a 5' coax cable feet. Full disclosure: the cable connection going into the house is a bit 'flakey'; resultant frequency-specific attenuation may explain some of the reception inconsistency I'm experiencing.

Continue reading with Part 2, 'Thin-Air ATSC (And NTSC): Correlating Compass, Distance And Frequency'...


Reader Comments


at 7/30/2008 2:19:29 PM, x_acto said:
Nice place

at 7/31/2008 2:18:50 AM, Le Manoir des Alberges said:
Beside the interest of the information found in this article, I admire your house ! Lucky Renos inhabitant.. wish our place was looking so nice! We would like to offer such sercices in our guest house in the Alps in France close to Grenoble but I think we've to wait next decade !! Have a good day www.lemanoirdesalberges.com

at 8/2/2008 7:30:00 AM, Jeff Deck said:
You probably should not wrap the antenna lead-in coaxial cable around the antenna masting. Securing with a wrap of electrical tape, and running the cable vertical and parallel to the mast would be better!

at 8/2/2008 7:33:42 AM, Meduci said:
Low loss RG-6 cable is preferred. How did the two individual antennas compare at your receive location?

at 8/4/2008 2:39:37 PM, DW said:
Remind me again why you don't just go with DirecTV or Dish Network?

at 8/4/2008 2:46:14 PM, Brian Dipert said:
Dear DW, because television viewing isn't important enough to me to pay for it. Because other folks don't have sufficient disposable income to be able to afford satellite (or cable or IP) television service. Because this is a particularly timely issue considering that the NTSC 'sunset' is scheduled to happen in just over six months' time. And anyway, assuming the overhead view isn't blocked, because there probably isn't any technical challenge (aka educational opportunity) involved in sticking a satellite antenna on the house! ;-)

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.