EDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology.
Sep 17 2007 9:04AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (0) |
Blog This! using: Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us
One of the key hinge factors in the success or failure of AMD's K10 microarchitecture, as I mentioned in last Tuesday's quad-core Opteron writeup, has to do with the rapidity and voracity of competitor Intel's product (and pricing) response, both on Intel's current 65 nm process and coming-soon 45 nm follow-on. I'm scheduled for some benchmark time with a 45 nm Penryn-based system this week at IDF (similar to the arrangement with the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 I tested a year ago), and I hope to have a motherboard and CPU of my own in-hand soon thereafter. Feel free to draw conclusions about Intel's 45 nm process and product health, and the likelihood of a rumoured mid-November formal product launch.
Even though Intel isn't yet shipping out Penryn-based hardware to reviewers, well-connected folks are already getting their hands on CPUs (usually via motherboard vendor intermediaries). As a preview of my own coverage to come later this week, therefore, check out the following links (keeping in mind that, since they're based on unofficial and likely early beta silicon, their correlation to subsequent production chips is unclear):
Keep in mind as you read the analysis that Penryn is more than just a litho shrink of today's Core microarchitecture-based (i.e. 'Core 2' marketing moniker) products. Already-announced improvements include:
Penryn is the 'tick' (derivative) first step in Intel's 45 nm process plan, reflective of the fact that it's not wise to simultaneously transition both process and microarchitecture. The follow-on 'tock' new microarchitecture to succeed Penryn will appear in products currently known only by their Nehalem project code name.