Zibb

Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology. Follow the Brian's Brain Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/BrianzBrain.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Ooma's Peer- and HomePNA-Assisted Dial Tones

May 28 2008 1:00AM | Permalink |Comments (1) |


Two weeks back, within my extended rant regarding VUDU's promiscuous and largely undocumented (mis)use of its customers' upstream bandwidth for peer-to-peer video distribution purposes, I mentioned:

I'd like to think that my VUDU experience is atypical, but I fear it'll be increasingly common in the future. I've already mentioned Skype's network nimbleness, and Joost (from the same core developer team) pulls the same tricks, as do Sling Media and another company I'll be writing about in the next few days.

A few days...a few weeks...whatevah. The 'another company' that I was referring to, and that I'll tell you about today, is VoIP provider ooma, whose Analog Devices Blackfin-based gear (so I hear...I haven't yet cracked it open to see for myself) and service I've been testing for the past few months. In retrospect, it wasn't entirely fair to lump ooma in with the others. Although this particular company's does employ P2P techniques, and although it's not particularly upfront about this fact, low bitrate voice traffic doesn't clog broadband WAN connections (and LANs) to the same degree that standard- and high-definition video does. But watch out if you don't have an unlimited local calling plan...

P2P's cost-reduction potential is seemingly key to how the company hopes to survive, since ooma promotes free lifetime U.S. calling after a one-time 'Hub' hardware buy, and especially since a recent management change-induced strategy shift resulted in the cost of that base hardware dropping from $400 to $249 (lumped with a 'Scout' satellite unit that formerly cost $40, to boot...although extra 'Scouts' now cost $60). Unlike most VoIP providers, therefore, ooma doesn't fundamentally rely on monthly service charges for an ongoing revenue stream, although, if you want to make international calls, you'll pay an incremental per-minute fee for the privilege. And, marking another strategy shift, the formerly free-for-life second-line, three-way-calling, expanded-function (i.e. realtime-screened) voicemail and other enhanced features now come with no incremental cost for the first 60 days...after then, ooma Premier capabilities will cost you an incremental $12.95 per month or $99 per year.

But back to P2P; what's ooma doing in this regard? Well nothing, actually, at least in my particular configuration. At minimum, you can configure ooma's service in a traditional standalone VoIP manner, with a unique phone number and all voice traffic (inbound and outbound) flowing over your broadband conection. That's how I've been using ooma. However, you've also got the option to route both an Ethernet connection and your POTS landline into the ooma Hub (which among other things means that if you lose premises power or your broadband connection goes down, you can still make landline-based phone calls), along with optionally porting your existing phone number from your current service provider to ooma.

That particular service slant's not available to me, because as I've mentioned several times before, AT&T doesn't offer 'naked' (i.e. unbundled) DSL service. And, as it turns out, there's another reason why my particular phone plan is unappealing from an ooma standpoint, even if I were to go with an intermediary Call Forward Busy repartitioning approach to landline merging. Since I must have some sort of phone service from AT&T bundled with my DSL service, I went with the absolutely lowest cost package I could find (the $6 metered service plan...since I use VoIP for all long distance calls), which means that I pay 2 cents/minute for local calls beyond the first 90 minutes (I think) of outgoing use per month. But wait...why are we even talking about outgoing local POTS-based calls at all? Ahhh...that's the crux of ooma's P2P approach.

The company's website FAQ is somewhat cryptic about what's going on, saying:

ooma's call-routing algorithm, a/k/a the people-powered network, uses the Internet to connect local calling areas throughout the US for free instead of relying primarily on traditional phone switches, known as the PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network). ooma's call-routing technology ensures a completely transparent experience, so the ability to make and receive calls is not impacted when the line is in use by another ooma caller.

And interestingly, now that ooma Premier is part of the company's services suite pitch, the following qualifier recently got added to the explanation;

Customers who purchase or subscribe to ooma Premier are automatically exempted from the people-powered network.

Continue reading with 'Ooma: Peering Details And Hands-On Perspectives'...


Reader Comments



at 5/28/2008 8:18:21 PM, Loren Amelang said:
Hi Brian,

How long has your California measured rate POTS line cost 2 cents per minute? Mine had been 0.7 cents per minute forever, until April 2008 when it suddenly with no warning or explanation went to 2 cents.

I don''t care about the POTS line, but they applied the same per-minute increase to my ISDN service, resulting in a $130 surprise when the bill for April arrived.

It took me an hour and a half of being passed from office to office to reach anyone at AT&T who even knew what ISDN was. It took her a week to confirm that, yes, an order had come from the head office back east to raise ISDN minutes by 2.3 times.

I understand there are few customers left to care about ISDN prices, but I''m surprised nobody seems to have noticed the increase in measured rate POTS minutes. Does nobody read their bill anymore? Aren''t POTS charges supervised by the PUC?

Also, I remember you reporting last June that AT&T would be forced to offer "naked DSL". Did that not happen, or did you just sign up at the wrong time?

Loren

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites