Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Sony's PS3: I'll Give It A C(-)

Mar 6 2007 11:22PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (27) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


Greetings from Dallas, Texas. Robert Cravotta and I are here at TI's Developer Conference, so I'll unfortunately miss Phil Harrison's (President, Worldwide Studios, Sony Computer Entertainment) Game Developer Conference keynote tomorrow morning in San Francisco (Friday afternoon I head from here to Las Vegas to attend PMA through Sunday). As promised both in my two-weeks-back introductory comments and in last week's Linux-on-PS3 development platform multi-part writeup, I'm going to focus this part of the review on the Sony PlayStation 3 as a consumer electronics device.

I'm intentionally publishing this writeup prior to Harrison's keynote because I suspect his speech tomorrow morning, like innumerable ones of conferences past, will be heavy with future promises but light on present-day deliverables. Maybe I'll be surprised a day from now, but I doubt it. This review won't give a nod to future prognostications; it's a reflection of what PS3 owners have cumulatively experienced over the past four months, since the console's launch in early November, and through multiple firmware upgrades.

Sony regularly touts (and prices) the PS3 as a long-term investment, but consumers flat out don't buy gear now based on a promise of what it might be someday....particularly gear that costs $500 or more. Perhaps that's why the retail channel inventory of unsold consoles is ballooning, even though the company claims otherwise. Had Sony started shipping the PS3 prior to the Xbox 360, as was the case in the PS2-versus-Xbox past, I'd likely be telling you a very different story. Heck, had the PS3 launched coincident with the Xbox 360, but at the same price tag, I'd be feeling more optimistic about its chances. But the reality of the situation is that the PS3 is a year late, and $200 (plus video cabling and, perhaps, external switching) more expensive, than the Xbox 360. In coming paragraphs, I'll explore the impact of those fiscal and schedule discrepancies.

Given the comments I've already made in this writeup, along with my pre-hands-on thoughts of times past, you might be surprised at the C- rating I assigned the PS3 in the title above. There's actually a fair bit to like about the console....and my hands-on inspection hints at a tremendous amount of additional yet-unrealized potential. That's perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the PS3; assume that development began a few months prior to the March 2000 PS2 launch in Japan (say, for purposes of this exercise, six months beforehand). That would mean that Sony and its partners have had seven and a half years to get their collective PS3 act together. Read on to determine for yourself if they have, particularly to the degree that it justifies a $500 or $600 console price tag.

For my testing (to date), I've watched two Blu-ray movies; Kung Fu Hustle (which I never grow tired of) and Lady In The Water (which I thought was much better than its lack of commercial success would have otherwise suggested), along with several DVDs. I've played the demos for Grand Turismo HD, MotorStorm and Formula One Championship Edition, along with full versions of Resistance: Fall of Man and Blazing Angels (the latter courtesy of a 10-day free trial of GameFly's rental service). And I'll remind you that I'm testing the $599 high-end version of the PS3, and that my test setup tethers the console to my Princeton Graphics AF3.0HD 30" widescreen CRT, whose analog component video inputs accept 480p, 720p and 1080i signals.

First impressions; this console is quiet. My Xbox 360, in comparison, sometimes (depending on what it's doing at the time) sounds like a F/A-18 Hornet taking off. Big-time kudos to Sony's engineers for the passive heat dissipation technology lurking inside the unit's glossy black chassis. The PS3 makes a top-notch Blu-ray player, especially when you pair it with the optional $25 remote control. Since the wireless link between the remote and console employs Bluetooth technology, you have to first pair the two, a task that inevitably requires perusal of the instruction manual. The remote control isn't required; it's possible to fully manage optical disc playback using only the game controller, but the remote makes it much easier (although I do wish it had backlit buttons).

Frankly, I'm still not convinced that blue laser discs are a compelling-enough upgrade to conventional DVD to ensure their long-term success. If you are, though, I'd definitely recommend a PS3 over an equivalent-priced-to-more expensive Blu-ray player, The dedicated player is more expensive because, unlike the console, its cost isn't subsidized to the same degree by future game title sales; not only is it also lesser-featured but it's also more difficult to firmware-upgrade and ultimately more prone to rapid obsolescence. It's nice to see that the PS3 will (someday, maybe) be able to upscale DVDs, a feature which the Xbox 360 has (over VGA connections) already supported for nine months.

Continue reading with 'Sony's PS3: Streaming, Browsing and Gaming Stumbles'....


Reader Comments


at 3/7/2007 4:23:33 AM, 111 said:
"better late than never. oh... sorry got a plane to catch!"

at 3/7/2007 9:01:40 AM, Sony said:
THIS DUDE''S CRAZY!!! X-BOX DOES NOT SHIP WITH A HD PLAYER, DOES NOT HAV LARGER HARDDISK SPACE NO 7.1 AUDIO SUPPORT NO UP-CONVERSION OF DVD TO HD RESOLUTION... EVERY OTHER GUY KEEPS COMPLAINING PS3 COSTS MORE THAN X-BOX-360. ITS NOT TRUE. PS3 COMES BUNDLED WITH BLU-RAY PLAYER SUPPORT FOR LAGER HARD DISK DRIVE, YOU GET FREE ONLINE GAMING (X-BOX OWNERS GET CHARGED FOR USING X-BOX LIVE SERVICES.) HENCE THE PRICE TAG! AND NOT TO MENTION PS3''S PROCESSOR IS MUCH MORE ADVANCED AND POWERFULL AS COMPARED TO X-BOX.WHAT A SHAME PPL DONT REALISE THESE THINGS.

at 3/7/2007 9:23:22 AM, microsoft said:
Your check is in the mail.

at 3/7/2007 9:49:02 AM, Gamer said:
I would give the PS3 a B- only because it needs more games, the Blu Ray player is great and all but I want to play better games.

at 3/7/2007 10:17:35 AM, c-bass said:
hey brian, i think you might have mixed up your "Brian's Brain" article with your "Brian's Crap" article. being completely unbiased and going from facts, this has been the most supported and largest scale of a system launch for Sony. They were sitting at number one in sales before this gen and including PS2 sales they are still there now. C -.........you wasted 3 minutes i will never get back. i hope you read these comments so i can return the favor. C- is a more a better grade for your journalism

at 3/7/2007 10:25:57 AM, kevinn said:
Fanboy alert! Do some homework. Xbox360 produces equal to or better graphics than the PS3. The CELL Processor is very difficult to program for and Sony will have fewer exclusive titles. The 360 is programmer friendly, has over 10 million units sold and has a great games library. The HD DVD drive is a nice option - if you want it. A larger hard drive is coming for those who want it. HD Movies, IPTV and web browsing is all coming this year. Can the PS3 do all of that? No.

at 3/7/2007 10:33:00 AM, kevinn said:
In my opinion, I would give the PS3 a "B". It is competent and has lots of features (whether you want them or not). It is in its infancy and is going through some growing pains. It will do just fine in the long run. The price point is going to kill it. They need to come out with one that does NOT have a blu-ray player in it. Lower the cost and sell more. They might even make a profit on those units instead of losing $200(?) per console. Until the price comes down, you won''t see them flying off the shelves too quickly. There''s still lots on eBay ("unopened" and "Factory Sealed") so all the sold units aren''t being used yet. Nintendo is the real winner here. And it looks like Sony is the one kicked to the curb...for now.

at 3/7/2007 10:36:38 AM, just_gaming said:
Well said Kevinn. No logical reason to get a PS3 if you want to play games, 360 beats it in almost every category, library, game play, graphics, online, etc. If you want a BluRay player it's a good buy. I'll just stick with DVDs for now. And for the next 2 or so years. Sorry Sony, your bad business decisions are yours, not mine.

at 3/7/2007 1:20:10 PM, Chris Bode said:
Rumour has it that the PS3 can play SACD discs, sounds like an excellent way to sneak multi-channel high- resolution audio into millions of households

at 3/7/2007 2:02:18 PM, someone who knows said:
just wait, knowing what is inside the PS3, it will blow the X-box away over the next couple years. Xbox will need to re-do their platform to keep up with what can be enabled in the existing PS3 H/W.

at 3/7/2007 5:31:12 PM, From someone who plays them all said:
My biggest complaint with the PS3 is that people keep talking about the blue player and how that adds to the value. I buy a game console to play games not watch movies so to me I look at the price point of a console based solely onwhat it can do for me as a game machine. In the future there are many games I will want for the PS3 but very few at the moment. Not enough at the 599 price. Software is what will sell a system and for almost the next 6 months sony has little in the way of unique software.

at 3/7/2007 9:13:03 PM, snyper said:
to the guy who say that xbox360 does not upscale dvds and that supposedly the ps3 is more powerfull and of better value, are you out of your mind??? Im upscaling my dvds over vga for months.2. xbox360 gpu easily destroys the ps3 gpu for so many reasons I could explain but I just leave it by saying any cross platform game and most games will look better on the 360 simply because is so easy to develop compare to the ps3 and as far as the cell proccesor goes, it would never reach full potential simply because it was never design for games in mind.and finally,the ps3 is not worth the price. why?? simple, because of the xbox360 wich gives you more and better games wich is why most of us bought the machine in the first place. You could say all you want about blu-ray adding value but every one knows we dont need blu-ray for games and at the end of the day 360 owners got more and better games,the choice to upgrade to hd dvd to watch hd movies if they feel like it........

at 3/14/2007 1:48:21 PM, KP said:
I can''t wait until AMD/ATI comes up with a quad-core/GPU singe-chipper that makes them both look pathetic. Yup, it''ll be a PC, but I like buiiding them up myself, anyway. You heard it here first.

at 3/14/2007 3:15:48 PM, Haywood Jublome said:
"The PS3 makes a top-notch Blu-ray player" Are you smoking crack?? I really enjoy watching Blu Ray movies on my 720p HDTV because the gaystation downconverts them to 480p, yeah that''''''''''''''''s top notch, A High Def player that doesn''''''''''''''''t support 720p. Whn I called $ony''''''''''''''''s customer support the idiot on the other end tells me that Blu Ray does not support 720p and that I should buy a new TV. My XBox 360 upconverts DVDs when I use VGA cables and the picture quality of the HD DVDs blows Blu Ray out of the water. And as an added bonus the games for the XBox are so much better and HALO 3 is not even out yet!!!!

at 3/14/2007 10:55:40 PM, PS3owner said:
Here''s my take on the XBox360. For gaming, most XBox360 titles can be found in PC platform too. Why should I spend another $$$ for the Xbox when I upgrade my graphics card & play the same titles on my PC? I admit, some PS3 titles can be found in PC too, but I wouldn''t buy those. A PS3 is a worthy investment IF you want a blu-ray player, a home-theatre setup based around it, and some exclusive game titles. Linux is a nice bonus for programming folks. I agree with keviin: a lower-end PS3 should swap the blu-ray with DVD

at 3/14/2007 11:07:24 PM, PS3owner said:
...And make the hard drive and Wi-Fi optional for low-end PS3. But keep the SD/MS/CF slots there as it is dirt cheap to get one for game backups.

at 3/15/2007 4:45:08 AM, Jp said:
Let every other person shut-up! Xbox is it. Ps3 Tried but blue ray play is not part of what any gamer needs. Graphis quality is what is needed and Xbox360 has got better of it than ps3. period!

at 3/15/2007 10:40:25 AM, some one that actually know said:
The xbox 360 ships WITH a 20GB hard drive for the PRO. I must quote this from the website. " Contains: - Microsoft XBOX 360 console - 20 GB Hard drive - wireless controller - HD AV cable - ethernet network cable - wired XBOX Live headset - white faceplate - XBOX Live Silver service " for $400. PS3 does not include HD cables (this is for both versions) and only the $600 one includes a slightly bigger hard drive (60GB). PS3 does not work with USB hard drives (atleast the 3 I own) but the Xbox360 does, giving mine an extra 300GB space (just-in-case?). Processors: Xbox- 3 separate IBM 3.2GHz PS3- a SINGLE CPU running 7 "cell" cores. (Can anyone say bottle neck?) Graphics cards: Xbox- ATi unified pixel shader technology (non-traditional) PS3- RSX nVidia Card running at 550MHz (compared to normal 400MHz which gaudian.co.uk claims, which isn''''t true just for-the-record) Games: xbox- plays most xbox and all xbox 360 games with ease. PS3- Plays some PS2 games and all PS3 games. software--- Dashboard: Xbox360- uses a smooth dashboard to control all your media, games, and xbox live. PS3- Harder to navigate but looks much better. Online- Xbox360- almost every game is XBL, and is ONLY ~$50 a year. Tons of downloadable material including games, mini-games, demos, movies, TV-shows, skins, game updates, maps, and more. PS3- about 2 games are online. monthly fees. gets pretty expensive. very little downloadable content. Games- Xbox360- Halo series, Gears of War, Cold Planet, and many many more great games. PS3- God of War, Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy (which is also going to the xbox), and lastly GTA (which is ALSO going to the 360). The thing with all those games, is that they are all for the PS2. WHERE ARE THE GOOD PS3 GAMES?!?! Fun: Xbox- 4 plays per console. But XBL makes up for that easy. PS3- 8 players per console. But who has 8 very expensive controllers? Wii- 12 players per console using 1 controller (warioware). Overall Winner: Nintendo-Wii

at 4/2/2007 9:13:19 AM, Nick said:
WOW you guys are not thinking at all. you can'scrap the blu ray on the low end. The games are getting to be 50 gb. How do you plan on buying consoles to "play games" on dvd? Sadly what you want is graphics and physics being proccessed better. This will certainly involve a better proccessor and larger disc capacity. Oh yeah and lets not forget >50 mb downloads. LOL

at 4/12/2007 11:30:03 PM, xbox smacker said:
winge winge winge, thats all I ever hear from 360 MS owned baby suckers, grow up you diaper filling nose dripping crakheads, both machines are good. I hate Sony but love their PS3, Sony are arogant and need a kick in the rear to wake them up, as for MS, jesus......these guys have been ripping the PC users for decades, with an OS that was stolen in the first place, they are breaking the law every day, and their fanboys are kissing thier ass for being ripped off by them LOL. Whatever machine you want then go for it, they are both very powerfull machines, but I also believe in the next year or so, that xbox 360 will be looking at an xbox 720 LOL. The PC is always the winner, always has been and always will.

at 5/17/2007 2:36:06 PM, Phillip Nguyen said:
You reviewed the PS3 using a non 1080p, of course you're not going to see the significant difference between Blu-Ray and the vastly inferior HD-DVD format. I bought the 360 when it initially came out and love it, but I did the same for the PS3, and I think that Sony did a better job of offering more bang for the overall buck when it comes down to the all-in-one entertainment experience. MS now wants users to fork over $180 for the 160Gb drive, $200 for the HD-DVD add-on, and don't forget the 'optional' wireless 11.08g receiver @ $99 still [after 2 yrs?!]. C'mon now.... [Also, for the price, the new 360 Elite should have built-in HD-DVD playback, and it should be better than the add-on which got low reviews from 90% of the reviewers across the board!].

at 5/17/2007 2:41:49 PM, Phillip Nguyen said:
To the poster that claimed that the PS3 doesn't read USB HDDs, my PS3 was able to read off of my Maxtor 500GB, Seagate 750GB, WD 500GB and my latest Maxtor 1TB just fine. It also is able to read off of USB keys, and this is from Nov thru the recent 1.70 update. Neither MS nor Sony's superior to the other in that regard IMO, as neither support DivX/Xvid playback right out of the box and both prefer their native formats over others, but thanks to TVersity, I can use the 360 to stream Divx smoothly from any PC, even after the new spring update. The same can be achieved with the PS3 and Wii, but it's not as hassle-free and smooth as with the 360; but again this is via third party SW!

at 5/17/2007 2:48:43 PM, Feyd said:
I like both systems like the previous poster, but I wanted to add that I like XBox Live more as it offers more than what Sony currently offers (although they're improving with free Gran Tourismo HD, and Tekken 5 and Calling All Cars rocks); but when Home comes out hopefully they'll give XBL a run for their money. XBL now works alongside Windows Vista via Gamer's Live so that'll open things up more in MS' favor. I also agree that side-by-side comparisons with Blu-Ray's best movies outplay HD-DVD, but that's what happens when you have 50GB disks vs 25 or 30GB! Wait until the 300GB Blu-Ray comes out. Come on guys, I don't want to flip disks for a movie OR a game, like Final Fantasy or Resident Evil, etc...do you? This'll be closer to the cartridge days, especially when Sony lets us swap out the 60GB or 20GB drive with whatever size drive we want off-the-shelf in the future vs. MS' using those tiny laptop ones.

at 5/17/2007 2:49:28 PM, Captain N said:
U R All Gae. Wii Rulz All.

at 5/17/2007 2:52:43 PM, Master Chief said:
Feyd, I think you meant 200G for Blu-Ray, not 300. Yes, that is cool and will be awesome, but it still isn't HALO 3 or HALO Wars. As for the Wii, Nintendo said their's no shortage yet people are still fighting to get a slightly souped up Gamecube ver. 2.0. Why hasn't anyone investigated them over this?

at 7/3/2007 10:52:44 AM, Spudge_Boy said:
"HD Movies, IPTV and web browsing is all coming this year. Can the PS3 do all of that? No. " Ummm, my PS3 can do these things. HD Movies = BluRay DVD IPTV = YouTube Web Browsing = Web Browsing

at 8/25/2008 5:16:37 PM, XxSwiftPainxX said:
My friends and I were hoping that playstation would come out with a way to switch your online id instead of restarting but if they are not i might as well get an x-box because i have to keep on adding all my friends to my account if i switch

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.