Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Thursday, August 28, 2008

White Spaces: Shure's Two Faces

Aug 28 2008 10:14AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (4) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


From one television-related controversy to another...

Shure continues to be the a particularly vociferous critic of the White Space dynamic UHF-and-VHF spectrum usage pitch, seizing on any testing hiccup, big or small, (curiously, however, this information isn't on Shure's website) as a blanket condemnation of the technology. At the same time, the company continues to turn a blind eye to the reality that most of its UHF and VHF wireless microphone customers are operating their equipment without having first obtained the necessary FCC license. As I wrote in a cover story published earlier this month:

Shure publicly leads the other large, vocal anti-White Spaces alliance, the Microphone Interests Coalition. The members’ complaints border on hypocrisy; although the law requires owners and operators of FCC Part 74 devices, such as wireless microphones, to obtain licenses, few do. “We-were-here-first” arguments lose much of their punch when, as it turns out, “we were here first, illegally” more accurately describes the situation.

As such, I confess to feeling no shortage of satisfaction at seeing that the FCC is finally waking up to the issue. A recently proposed ruling will, if it becomes law, ban all low-power auxiliary transmitters (including wireless mic base stations) from the '700 MHz' (698- to 806-MHz, i.e. UHF channels 52 to 69) spectrum swath that the FCC auctioned off earlier this year. More generally, a consortium called the PISC (Public Interest Spectrum Coalition) filed damning anti-wireless microphone comments with the FCC last month. As Ars Technica reports:

Their filing called for an investigation of nine companies that they say "willfully and knowingly" market and sell wireless mics to "unauthorized users for ineligible purposes." The coalition wants the FCC to probe Shure and eight other alleged culprits for "deceptive advertising practices," and offer "amnesty" for unlicensed wireless mic users, as long as they relocate their operations elsewhere.

It is my sincere hope that the FCC responds to the filing by broadening its investigation to cover the entire UHF and VHF spectrum, not just the '700 MHz' portion.

To get you up to speed on the White Spaces topic, below please find some other industry coverage that post-dated the finalization of my cover story (notably again from Ars Technica, who's doing an outstanding job of regularly revisiting the issue):

Google, who my article mentioned is an especially strong White Spaces advocate, just launched a consumer-targeted website called 'Free The Airwaves':

And, in closing (at least for now), check out a recent FCC comments filing by Motorola, which Cisco Systems' Peter Ecclesine brought to my attention.


Reader Comments


at 8/28/2008 10:46:44 AM, Paul Rako said:
Bad money pushes out good money and big money pushes out small money. The telcos, wireless manufactures and Google can pass bigger envelopes of cash under the politician's tables. Simple as that. Filling up white space before we even access how much a disaster digital TV is going to be just shows that in the quest for filthy lucre, the FCC has no shame. Why should they worry about interference when they can make a few more billion in spectrum auctions? Once again the people lose.

at 8/28/2008 3:55:47 PM, Stiggle said:
Funny thing is that the FCC is really auctioning off Lease of the spectrum space. So they can turn around and take it away depending upon who's money carries the most weight...

at 8/30/2008 11:18:07 PM, Mike M said:
Google seems to be operating from a position that so much spectrum will be "freed" from dropping analog service. However, it''s not really that much. 1) We are losing 52-69, which is huge in areas like LA, which have multiple channels in this range right now, which have to move to lower channels. 2) Low VHF (2-6) will not be widely used by broadcasters. Many have moved up to UHF. However, I doubt that Google is interested in this band. 3) Land Mobile devices take up many channels in urban areas, such as LA, NYC, Boston & Philadelphia, so they are not available for broadcasters. Google will be hard pressed to find a channel to operate on in the LA, NYC & Philadelphia DMA''s. Also, Google has no concept of adjacent channel interference. Even a 1-4W signal is huge up to a quarter mile, compared to a distant broadcaster. If anyone else has had to deal with getting a weak channel with a strong adjacent, it is not easy. WSD''s might be viable in Low-VHF or in very rural areas that have blocks of 4+ consecutive unused channels. Oh, one other thing, there are no White Spaces on cable TV. Google wants for free what other companies had to pay billions for (in parts of the 52-69 range). Why should we give it to them?

at 11/7/2008 9:33:13 AM, Chris E said:
While you state that most wireless microphone users were "illegal" users of the spectrum, as they were unlicensed, you miss the fact that licenses were not available to the majority of users, at any price, or by any means. The FCC knew full well that the vast majority of device, which they approved, were not being sold to licensed operators. Those operators are now paying the price of the FCC''''s shortcomings. All wireless microphone users want is a chunk of spectrum that they can operate reliably on.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.