Zibb

Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology. Follow the Brian's Brain Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/BrianzBrain.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Back To Shoeboxes? Gimme A Break

Feb 27 2007 6:48PM | Permalink |Comments (7) |


Back in 2004, both Matt Miller and I weighed in, with no shortage of skepticism, on Sandisk's just-announced Shoot & Store campaign. The company's belief, in brief, was that if it was able to hit certain consumer-friendly retail price points with its flash memory cards, folks wouldn't bother dumping the cards' contents (once full) onto hard drives, optical discs or other alternative media for archive. Instead, they'd just toss the full card into a shoebox, or a desk drawer, go out and buy another Shoot & Store card, and proceed to fill it up.

A great way for a flash supplier to goose demand and fill flash memory fabs. Not a great way, however, to solve a consumer problem, I suggested then and I still suggest. Why does Sandisk believe it can successfully swim upstream against an increasingly strong current of hardware, software and systems momentum (spanning computers, cameras and the code that allows them to communicate) that assumes a user will dump his pictures off the pricey semiconductor memory in the camera and onto a common, incredibly inexpensive magnetic media repository? I don't know about you, but my desk drawer contains a miniscule black hole (akin to the one in the clothes dryer that eats socks); I'd never trust my precious photos to it. Not to mention the mind-boggling difficulty of figuring out which of the three dozen memory cards in the palm of my hand contains the particular picture of Aunt Polly (or my precious puppy) that I'm looking for.

The next step in Sandisk's fab-filling mission occurred in January of last year, when it purchased Matrix Semiconductor, a 3-D OTP (one-time programmable) memory manufacturer whose technology I wrote about in a feature article one year earlier. At the time Sandisk announced the acquisition, I remember thinking (but I don't think I publicly shared those thoughts) that this was the perfect memory for Shoot & Store. After all, to that point, Sandisk had been selling over-featured (ie re-writeable) NAND flash memory into the write-once application. And yesterday, as Digital Photography Review reports, Sandisk made my prognostication official.

Sorry, but I still don't buy into the usage model that Sandisk's pitching. What about you, folks? I'm having breakfast with Sandisk at PMA next week and, if they succeed in changing my mind (even a little bit), I'll report back. Until then, I welcome your thoughts.


Reader Comments



at 2/28/2007 1:28:56 PM, Paul Rako said:
Two thinks come to mind: 1) Does no one at Sandisk understand the phrase "backup strategy"? One of the great things about digital storage is that it is assessable, th other is that it can be backed up. If the shoe box gets burned in a fire Aunt Polly and the puppy gets burned too. I have a spare machine on my home network and synchromagic replicates all my files on that machine every night. Once a week I replicate onto a 400 gig USB drive and go swap that with the OTHER 400 gig drive in my safe-deposit box. 2) Accessibility. Having aunt Polly and Dipert''s puppy on my hard drive means I can get to and look at it and print it out in seconds, not minutes (or hours if I misplace the memory card. Using flash for long term storage is a bit silly.



at 2/28/2007 1:45:46 PM, Tom H. said:
Paul, you sound like an IT administrator. Do you really think the average person follows the same photo backup regimen that you do? Or indeed, anything even close?

Welcome to the real world. My father puts the memory card from his digital camera into the card reader I gave him. He accesses the files on the card and views the pictures on screen. Later, he erases the card, often neglecting to copy the files to his hard drive. Then when he can't find the pictures on his computer, he panics and calls me. I give him the bad news that his pictures are lost forever.

"But the pictures were on my computer!" he cries. "I saw them on my screen!"

So he's losing his latest digital pictures, but meanwhile I'm scanning treasured family photos from the original 4x5 and 2-1/4 negatives he shot with his press camera and Rollei in the 1950s and '60s.

Moral: for millions of people, write-once media and a shoebox are hard to beat.




at 2/28/2007 1:48:38 PM, Rod Weeks said:
I think a lot of us have a collection of 40 to 80 gig drives in the closet, otherwise doing nothing. I back up onto these every so often. My local ubergeek store is selling mag storage at about $.32 a gig. Not to mention the 100 paks of DVD-R's selling for about $29.00 -or 6.3 CENTS/ gig. Hard to beat either with flash.



at 2/28/2007 1:49:52 PM, rod weeks said:
Bring back the polaroid!



at 3/2/2007 1:35:03 PM, Mark S. said:
Tom H raises an interesting point. It hints at those that aren't tech savvy and maybe in the term that is true. Longer term, most folks will feel very comfortable with computers making the authors points hard to refute down the road. Maybe far enough down to not make that shoebox look so bad from a marketing perspective?



at 3/5/2007 2:19:50 AM, Amine H said:
It’s pretty obvious at the moment that flash memory are not adequate for long term storage, but so far are the best portable solution.

The key issue is capacity and cost.
I won’t need 100 memory flash cards if I can get a 100GB for $20!




at 3/5/2007 6:38:26 AM, Ron W. said:
I agree with Tom H. I'm a "techie" who works with the "real" consumer world. They do not want to learn about all the bunch of ways to transfer and back up their precious pictures, all different from each other. Once on the NAND card, that's where they stay. Also there are a bunch of vendors who are catering to those folks: Printers with LCD viewers and editors with a variety of sockets for the various plug format NAND cards, and now the "best", electronic picture frames, which for the most of them, require the pictures to be on a NAND card.
SD is right on the money!

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites