Zibb

Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology. Follow the Brian's Brain Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/BrianzBrain.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Sunday, May 6, 2007

Rocketfish: Spectrum Shark

May 6 2007 8:22AM | Permalink |Comments (6) |


Several weeks ago, I asked you all for recommendations on wireless transmitter and receiver (the latter also with a two-channel amplifier) setups that'd enable me to broadcast high-fidelity audio sans wires to a set of rear surround speakers. Based on a recommendation in the comments, I went ahead and tracked down a Rocketfish wireless speaker kit (Rocketfish appears to be a Best Buy 'house' brand, as the setup seems to be only available for purchase there and the press relations contact information is identical to that for Best Buy).

Good news first; the Rocketfish gear is brain-dead easy to set up. You wire the rear surround channels' line level signals into the diminutive transmitter, which also requires a tiny AC-to-DC 'wall wart'. The larger receiver contains its own AC cord and offers volume control; you connect the rear channel speakers to it. In my setup, the transmitter and receiver are about 8 feet apart, but in-between them is a slipcloth-covered leather couch which blocks line-of-sight proximity. Nevertheless, they powered up and found each other almost immediately; they come pre-paired from the factory. Any front-to-rear channel delay caused by the wireless intermediary was undetectable by either my wife or I, although I should clarify that so far we've only watched one movie (which made sparing use of the rear surrounds for effects) on the setup; I haven't yet done any critical listening tests of surround music, for example.

Now the bad news. As soon as I powered up the Rocketfish transmitter, I noticed significant impairment of the 2.4 GHz 802.11g link connecting my laptop and router, as another prior commenter had suggested (and as I'd suspected) might occur. The degradation is of a form that I've never seen before; my laptop indicates no decrease in Wi-Fi signal strength coming from the router, yet significant packet loss still occurs. Rocketfish's documentation doesn't indicate which portion of the 2.4 GHz band its product uses; when I've encountered situations like this in the past (cordless phones, etc), I've assumed that the offending device's signal is strongest at the center of the band (i.e. at channel 6). Indeed, by reconfiguring my router from channel 6 to channel 11, I've been able to restore reasonably solid Wi-Fi connectivity....except when I'm sitting on the couch, directly in front of the Rocketfish transmitter, where it appears to corrupt the entire 2.4 GHz band.

Since I don't normally surf the 'net while watching movies ;-), I can get around the problem by turning off the Rocketfish gear when I'm not using it. However, I've also got an Amphony model 1520 wireless transmitter/receiver set on the way. Since it employs the 5.8 GHz band which nothing else in this house is using (my cordless phones are 900 Mhz models, for perhaps obvious reasons!), and given my positive past-published experience with the company's 5.8 GHz wireless headphones, I suspect Amphony may be the preferable long-term solution. I'll report back after I've had a chance to hook 'em up.

Back in 2002, I grumbled about spectrum interference, a problem compounded by consumers' understandable ignorance of the issue and of the available options for fixing it. Some things, I guess, never change.


Reader Comments



at 5/6/2007 10:26:12 AM, Taylor said:
Not surprised. I don't get it - I talk to tech people all day long, and I would say only 10% of those people think there is a problem. The rest think that everything will be wireless in "another couple of year" - which sounds to me like the hologram drives that are never-endingly 5 years away....I digress.

My point is no one seems to understand why I am planning to use fixed wiring for my audio/video distribution system in my house. They all think wireless and an Apple TV will save the day.

Call me a curmudgeon, but I think experiences like yours prove that wired is still better for fixed installations.



at 5/6/2007 1:24:15 PM, Brian Dipert said:
Dear Taylor, I have Cat5E cabling routed through the crawlspace under the home, along with two powerline networking spurs, as the LAN backbone of my Sacramento abode for that very reason....



at 5/9/2007 6:16:12 PM, Jon Judson said:
Network Stumbler is a nice free utility that will show other nearby access points and their channel; but the best feature is the display of the signal to noise ratio. I have wireless security cameras that were destroying my connection speed until I juggled channels using this utility.



at 5/9/2007 9:45:34 PM, Brian Dipert said:
Dear Jon, yes I'm familiar with NetStumbler and its Mac OS X and Windows equivalents. But they only show Wi-Fi transmitters; other devices inhabiting the 2.4 GHz band (Bluetooth devices, cordless phones, microwave ovens, Rocketfish transmitters, etc) are not shown



at 5/10/2007 1:38:18 AM, RFinsider said:
Yes, yes. 2.4 GHz is ever crowded. However, the rocketfish RF-HTIB is part of the dynamic system that is the conglomerate of devices that occupy the ISM spectrum. The RF-HTIB employs a system that is complementary by nature and extremely narrow-band. One thing to keep in mind. It will over time learn the spectrum's occupation and live on channels that are least occupied by surrounding systems, such as wide-band devices like 802.11. Turning the device off will actually clear its spectrum map and exacerbate your issues.

Netstumbler will help you understand if, in the location of your computer, if in fact YOUR WLAN AP is the strongest of all WLAN APs in your vicinity. In some apartments, this may not be the case. You may consider moving your WLAN AP to a more central location, such that YOUR WLAN AP asserts itself stronger in the vicinity of the Rocketfish. It's all about relative signal strengths. If your laptop/PC can see a comparably strong signal from your AP, as compared the RF-WHTIB's signal, you are likely in a situation where the Rocketfish will by its nature, choose to be in another area of the spectrum... over time. It take a few hours to settle in on relatively clearer channels.

Bottom line, if you are trying to use your PC in a zone where the WLAN AP you are trying to communicate with is a "weak" signal, than ANY competiting device in the 2.4 GHz spectrum will dominate the zone and be the bully. Try using a FHSS cordless phone in the same scenario, and you will see that the Rocketfish is MUCH politer than that sort of device, which is truly a big, bad, bully. Rocketfish is more meek. It wants to bob and weave. Its protocol is designed to float like a butterfly and sting like a bee. It needs the sting to make sure the critical, low-latency audio signal is preserved in tact.

Knowing this (if I explained it properly) can help you better configure your environment, and improve on what sounds like a fairly poor AP placement.

Also, try getting a Wi-Spy from MetaGeek. It will show you anything in 2.4.



at 5/10/2007 7:48:07 AM, JMizener said:
I have tried various solutions to the living-room-stereo-patio-speaker-synchronization problem over years. I was finally reduced to installing a dedicated amp driven by an old Dell laptop running Damn Small Linux on my back porch to access my network drive of music. This was the fallback solution after all attempts to get Slimserver/Softsqueeze and other similar streamed audio systems to work for more than a few minutes failed.
I have been looking for something like the Amphony 1520 for an eternity -- I cannot say how greatful I am that you have pointed me in their direction. I will order one today for use on my porch (speakers already installed) this weekend. Thanks to RFInsider for the pointer to Wi-Spy. I''ve been wanting something like that for a while as well.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites