EDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology. Follow the Brian's Brain Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/BrianzBrain.
Nov 18 2009 9:36AM | Permalink |Comments (1) |
Continued from 'Analyzing Nokia's Business: Past Performance Is No Guarantee Of Future Success'...
The O/S (and broader consumer support infrastructure) lack of user-friendliness doesn't help, either. Take my friend's E71 (running the S60 v3 flavor of Symbian), for example. Her prior handset was a BlackBerry, so some of her complaints (unclear-function shift and function keys, for example) are at least somewhat understandable impacts of platform migrations. But the unit's display backlight control was ridiculously over-aggressive by default, and figuring out how to adjust it was non-intuitive. Neither she nor I could discern how to activate the unit's speakerphone, even with the assistance of Nokia's documentation, until a random key press produced the desired end result. The handset employs a proprietary 2.5mm audio-plus-video connector (you know how much I love proprietary connectors, right?) that required a $10 adapter in order to use her conventional Plantronics headset. Thankfully that latter glitch has reportedly been fixed in the next-generation E72.
And here are some of the things I've uncovered in techie-testing the E71 myself, beyond her typical-consumer frustration threshold:
Hope is on the horizon. Here's the N900, introduced in late August and finally shipping to U.S. customers as of a few hours ago:
While it might look a lot like the earlier-shown N97, it leverages a newer ARM Cortex A8 CPU, and it also runs a completely different software stack in the form of the Linux-based Maemo O/S. As such, it's the actualization of the prediction I made more than a year and a half ago; a next-generation Internet Tablet with built-in GSM voice and data capabilities. And the reviews of it are much more solid than was the case with its N97 cousin. But as with prior smartphone offerings from the company, Nokia was unable to secure a cellular service provider partnership with the N900; the handset is GSM carrier-unlocked but pricey. There's light at the end of the tunnel, but is it an incoming train wreck? It's still not entirely clear to me how Nokia will be able to navigate its way out of its current smartphone predicament.
It's been pretty obvious to me for a while now that Maemo represents Nokia's software future with respect to smartphones, although I suspect Symbian has a long continued life ahead of it with low-end and mainstream handsets. As such, the company will now need to seriously juggle two operating systems, both with respect to internal resources and with all-important third-party developers (who are having a hard enough time comprehending multiple concurrent versions of the same Google Android O/S). I also continue to wonder if the recently announced partnership between Intel and Nokia will translate into x86 CPUs ending up in form factors smaller than the company's current 3G-supportive netbook, and how such a resultant hardware dichotomy versus ARM counterparts might complicate things from a corporate standpoint.