Brian DipertEDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert exposes, analyzes and
opines on diverse topics in technology.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Consumer Electronics Design Articles

Blog

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Google Chrome: EULA Backpeddles, Additional Vulnerabilities, O/S Alternatives And More Giggles

Sep 4 2008 9:33AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (7) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


Following up on yesterday's coverage, Google's now claiming that the egregious wording in the end user license agreement for its new Chrome browser was 'all a big mistake' and that the company is:

Working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome.

Right. The browser's been in development for two years, and the company still did an inadvertent last-minute copy-and-paste rush job on the EULA for it. Ahem. More likely, the uproar caused Google to backtrack on its original plans...thank goodness for the intensive analysis and information proliferation capabilities of the 'Net. With that said, Section 11 of the EULA has now been amended from:

By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.

to

You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services.

In other Chrome news, Microsoft employee Robert Hensing reports that the current version of the browser has two security flaws, not one as I previously reported, along with the inherent potential for additional circumventions. See his post for the detailed kernel process analysis data and deductions.

Type about:internets into the browser to get some amusing animated results:

 

Here are some more serious 'about:' options.

Lifehacker reports that it's possible to run currently-Windows-only Chrome on Linux via Wine (and therefore, presumably, on OS X via Darwine).

Google's Sergey Brin indicates that Android will 'probably' incorporate Chrome 'soon', thereby confirming what I'd already forecasted.

Here's an interesting Chrome-vs-IE8 comparison-and-contrast.

And finally, back to the silliness, here are some more parodies of Google's comic strip introducing Chrome. These are definitely NSFW (and easily offended folks should more generally stay away).


Reader Comments


at 9/4/2008 10:08:49 AM, Paul said:
I think the new browser from Google will be no.1, it may take a little time but Google will make sure this will be a success. To find out more about the chrome browser visit, www.chrome-video.com

at 9/8/2008 9:07:21 AM, Dan Aquinas said:
Did Google think their original EULA was following their informal corporate motto of "Don't be evil"?? Reading the Wikipedia entry at "en dot wikipedia dot org slash wiki slash Don%27t_be_evil" makes me amused, at first, but then I get scared for their original terms are all about Google taking as many "rights" as they can, versus balancing their rights with the user. This certainly seems like it borders on exploitation, which per the article, was something Google accused, not themsevles, but their competitors of doing. Would it surprise you if I am starting to not trust Google?

at 9/10/2008 4:32:24 PM, Policebox said:
Google has been scary for quite some time. They have repeatedly tried to collect huge amounts of data on people and their habits. The only thing that has kept it from turning into a huge issue is that they have been very scrupulous about using only abstracted versions of the data. I don't know about you, but I don't like the idea of a company capable of recording the entire internet planting keyloggers on everyone's computers. There is just too much potential for abuse.

at 9/11/2008 12:09:24 AM, Battar said:
For those of you who are "scared" by Googles intrusions to privacy, try to imagine your computer without any Google applications ruuning on it, or access to Google sites. You wouldn't know where to start.

at 9/11/2008 1:57:01 AM, Timbo said:
If you don't trust Google, and I don't, use someone else. There's plenty of alternatives available!

at 9/12/2008 2:49:07 PM, Larry M said:
Backpeddles? Did you mean Backpedals? Or are they really selling something in reverse?

at 9/13/2008 1:04:12 AM, Alanlondon said:
Batter, You must be a moron. There are hundreds of alternatives to google. Yahoo search is now better, analytics programs are open source, advertising can be without fraud and free and office programs are op. I for one have sacked Google from all my activities.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.