Zibb

Ann Steffora MutschlerWhat's happening behind the scenes in the semiconductor manufacturing industry? Read this blog by Senior Editor Ann Steffora Mutschler to find out - and chime in with your thoughts and questions.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Monday, April 9, 2007

Are solar energy tax credits enough to boost industry?

Apr 9 2007 11:26PM | Permalink |Comments (17) |


Late last year in its waning hours, the 109th Congress passed legislation to extend the 30 percent solar energy investment tax credit for homeowners and businesses for one additional year, through the end of 2008.

National trade association of the solar energy ecosystem the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) at the time applauded the one-year extension of the solar ITC in H.R. 6111, the “Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006,” but at the same time cautioned that the lifespan of the credits is too short to encourage significant industry growth and cost reductions.

“While this bill does not constitute a long-term solar growth policy, it does provide some breathing room for solar projects in the 12- to 18-month pipeline,” said Rhone Resch, SEIA President.  “It ensures that the solar industry will continue to grow at a record rate in 2007.  The passage of this bill with an extension of the solar ITC is recognition by Congress that solar is indispensable to our clean energy future."

An eight-year extension of the ITC will remain the solar industry’s top legislative priority in 2007.  A long-term extension is essential to reducing the cost of solar energy, as it would create market conditions that allow solar companies to make investments and drive down costs through economies of scale.  A longer duration will also be needed to help stimulate the development of large-scale concentrating solar power projects.

Resch also expressed optimism at the time that the 110th Congress would enact an eight-year extension as contained in S. 2677 and H.R. 5206, the “Securing America’s Energy Independence Act,” a bill which gained a bipartisan group of 80 House and 15 Senate cosponsors this year.

“This bill is a patch, and emphasizes the importance for Congress to enact long-term, comprehensive clean energy legislation when they return in January,” said Resch.  “We look forward to working with the next Congress, to craft a comprehensive and effective policy blueprint for a self-sustaining clean energy infrastructure in the United States.”

Specifically, the bill contains the following provisions:

--Residential Solar Tax Credit: Extends a 30-percent tax credit, created in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, for the purchase of residential solar water heating, photovoltaic equipment, and fuel cell property. Expires after December 31, 2008.

--Business Solar Tax Credit and Fuel Cell Tax Credit: Extends a 30-percent business credit, established in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, for the purchase of fuel cell power plants, solar energy property, and fiber-optic property used to illuminate the inside of a structure. After December 31, 2008, the credit reverts to a permanent 10-percent level.


What do you think, are these tax credits enough to propel the industry forward?

--Ann Steffora Mutschler, Senior Editor


Reader Comments



at 4/10/2007 4:00:19 AM, RR said:
Since this story was printed Congress has introduced two bills, S.590 and HR 550 to increase the use of solar energy. Both bills extend the tax credits through 2016, and expand the credits to $1500/half kW. These bills represent the most aggressive solar legislation in the history of the US and if enacted will create a strong market for all solar technologies in the US. If you support greater use of solar, please tell congress by participating in SEIA''''s letter writting campaign. Go to www.seia.org and click on the action alert symbol



at 4/10/2007 11:01:19 AM, RWCScribe said:
As long alternative energy requires massive tax support and subsidy, it will not attain a significant level of production in the US. Alternative energy has to be profitable to become acceptable.



at 4/10/2007 11:32:46 AM, DaveG said:
I looked at the available tax credit, 30% indeed, but capped at 2000 dollars. This is an insignificant percentage of the cost of an installation which could make a difference to electricity bills.

The federal rebate is capped too low to make a difference in solar uptake.



at 4/10/2007 11:42:46 AM, Ann Steffora Mutschler said:
DaveG, that is a very good point. Until installations get down to the $2,000 to $4,000 level for homeowners, this tax credit seems like it has many challenges to really provide the incentives needed for widespread adoption. The encouraging thing to note is that there is so much activity happening in the technology aspect that should bring the efficiency of solar cells up to a level that makes it cost-effective.



at 4/11/2007 12:04:11 PM, George B said:
The net impact of these tax credits is to divert hard earned dollars away from economically efficient solutions (coal, nuclear) and waste them on economically inefficient endeavors such as solar PV energy.



at 4/12/2007 8:01:10 AM, RWCscribe said:
Alternative energy sources are exonimically viable now, but not in the way we are distributing the technology. The social and political costs of coal and nuclear in the United States make them no more viable in the short of long run. What is neccessary is thinking about energy production in an entirely new way.



at 4/13/2007 8:08:22 AM, WHM said:
The solar industry should be focused on increased efficiency and lower productions costs. The tax credit is no real incentive to purchase. Get the ROI down to 5 years and people will have incentive to buy. A $2000 tax credit provides $600-$800 off a system that costs well over 10 times that to be effective. not much incentive. Lets hope we are close to the tiping point where costs and efficiencies are pushed down by economies of scale.



at 5/6/2007 6:52:58 AM, DJP said:
I agree that the current tax credit is not sufficient. I would like to point out that a $2000 tax credit gives $2000 off installation. A tax credit is not a deduction off your taxable income, it is a credit off of your tax owed. My other point is that the proposed government incentives for Solar not only benefit the consumer by making it more economical, but it drives money into the Solar industry to hopefully reduce cost and efficiencies in the long term. I am looking forward to this legislation providing enough of a cost savings (when combined with other state energy credits) to make this an affordable option.



at 5/9/2007 10:58:51 AM, HS said:
Tax credits are nice but effective, uniform "reverse metering" legislation would be much more effective in furthering the deployment of microscale, renewable power generation systems. Reverse metering means that if I have, say, a PV array on the roof of my house which is generating power in excess of my demand, I can put the power back on the grid, running my electric meter in reverse. This is something the utilities have been fighting against for years and they have been mostly successful in lobbying the state PUC''s to rule in their favor. It will take Federal legislation to overcome this.



at 5/14/2007 4:21:35 AM, G Burnet said:
Cost per kW-hr (cents):

Coal: 3

Nuclear: 6

Solar: 20

That pretty well sums up the situation.



at 5/16/2007 12:34:44 PM, Solar_user_CT said:
There are some good points here regarding the federal tax incentive. One thing I want to point out is that the $2000 cap applies to homeowners, while commercial entities are much more richly rewarded. Since, in general, a commercial building will have more areas that can be devoted to solar systems, they are more likely to spend bigger dollars and get bigger systems and thus generate more PV power.

For me, my state incentive program helped pay for almost half the cost of my 5KW PV system. That, for me, made the decision and for sure the payback time much more agreeable.

Extending the solar Federal tax credit is critical. Every little bit helps with reducing our dependence on foreign oil sources.

Also, there are other federal programs that give tax credits for installing high effecency applances and heating systems, insulation, etc.

I do agree that cost per KWhr for solar is high, but as more mass production comes online - especially in the thin film area - the costs will be reduced. Distributed production of power needs to be the way going forward, whether it is solar, wind, wave etc.



at 6/16/2007 7:27:02 PM, k9yarr said:
Anybody have any information in regards to the two bills currently being proposed that increases the tax credit to $1500 per 1/2 kW? Does anybody think it will pass this year? I see they were both introduced months ago and sent out to committees. Have they been put on a shelf to collect dust or is something being done about them? Yes solar is expensive but I'd rather pay to have a system on my house than put the money in Edison's pocket. All Edison does for me is raise my rates and add extra tiers to raise my rates. We are AMERICA not a third world county!



at 10/15/2007 8:31:43 AM, Solar_user_in_CT said:
k9yarr:

House Committee on Ways and Means

For Immediate Release:
Friday, August 3, 2007 Contact:
Matthew Beck or J. Jioni Palmer
(202) 225-8933

People Are Talking … about the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007
Scores of Organizations on record supporting responsible energy tax policy



They just keep coming. A coalition of groups has reached out to Congress to offer their support for H.R. 2776, the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007.

..snip

From the text, it appears that this bill went to the MARKUP process - where the Senate and House versions are cleaned up and differences resolved. Not sure how long that takes



at 10/15/2007 8:47:20 AM, Solar_user_in_CT said:
H.R.2776
Title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for the production of renewable energy and energy conservation.
Sponsor: Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15] (introduced 6/19/2007) Cosponsors (21)
Related Bills: H.RES.615, H.R.3221
Latest Major Action: 8/4/2007 Passed/agreed to in House. Status: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 221 - 189 (Roll no. 835).
House Reports: 110-214
Note: On 8/4/2007, pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 615, the text of H.R. 2776, as passed by the House, was appended at the end of the text of H.R. 3221 as new matter. See H.R. 3221 for further action.

LOOKs like H.R.2776 passed, but is now part of H.R.3221



at 10/15/2007 9:55:40 AM, Solar_user_in_CT said:
H.R.3221
Title: Moving the United States toward greater energy independence and security, developing innovative new technologies, reducing carbon emissions, creating green jobs, protecting consumers, increasing clean renewable energy production, and modernizing our energy infrastructure, and to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for the production of renewable energy and energy conservation.
Sponsor: Rep Pelosi, Nancy [CA-8] (introduced 7/30/2007) Cosponsors (18)
Related Bills: H.RES.615, H.R.6, H.R.2776, H.R.3220
Latest Major Action: 9/5/2007 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 340H.R.3221
Title: Moving the United States toward greater energy independence and security, developing innovative new technologies, reducing carbon emissions, creating green jobs, protecting consumers, increasing clean renewable energy production, and modernizing our energy infrastructure, and to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for the production of renewable energy and energy conservation.
Sponsor: Rep Pelosi, Nancy [CA-8] (introduced 7/30/2007) Cosponsors (18)
Related Bills: H.RES.615, H.R.6, H.R.2776, H.R.3220
Latest Major Action: 9/5/2007 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 340H.R.3221
Title: Moving the United States toward greater energy independence and security, developing innovative new technologies, reducing carbon emissions, creating green jobs, protecting consumers, increasing clean renewable energy production, and modernizing our energy infrastructure, and to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for the production of renewable energy and energy conservation.
Sponsor: Rep Pelosi, Nancy [CA-8] (introduced 7/30/2007) Cosponsors (18)
Related Bills: H.RES.615, H.R.6, H.R.2776, H.R.3220
Latest Major Action: 9/5/2007 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 340



at 11/4/2008 8:35:26 AM, Solar said:
Yes! Keeping in mind the drastic environmental changes and rising fuel prices going Solar is one option open to all at minimal investments. The Solar Water heating systems are so easy to install and most of them come in a Do-it Yourself kit, With the technological advancement the once heavy, bulky hard to move panels are now available widely in light weight easy to carry by one personal only packages. The advancement in technology is not only limited to light weight, but for those concern about the aesthetics of the panels, the good news is that the panels are now available with a variety of trim colors to choose from and can be easily matched to your roof. Saving about $25.oo on ones electricity bill every month on a residence of 4. We all use hot water, as one of our basic needs and what can be a better way, than helping our environment, saving our resources and ourself's some money other than by investing in a Solar Water Heating System.
There are a couple useful websites I'm aware off, that I would like to share with you
1. www.dsireusa.org - is a comprehensive source of information on state, local
, utility ans federal incentives that promote renewable engery ans energy efficieny.
2. www.powerpartnerssolar.com - one of the many manufacturers of certified Solar Water Heating Systems available. One place I saw the light weight panels and trim color options I was mentioning earlier.
Lastly, the local utilites in some areas also provide additional rebates and incentives for adding a Solar Water Heating Sytem to your exisitng water tank.
Keep the look out on. Feel Good and save- money for you, environment for us.




at 10/24/2009 12:42:27 PM, George said:
These tax credits are fantastic. Here is a great example of them www.geothermalexperts.net/residential_rebates.html

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites