Zibb

Industry leaders, moderated by EDN Senior Technical Editor Brian Dipert, share their thoughts on consumer electronics: past-event post-mortems, current developments and future trends. Follow the How We See CE Twitter feed at www.twitter.com/HowWeSeeCE.



   Advertisement

Friday, June 29, 2007

Going Beyond the Hype: The Real Story Of Hard Drives Versus Solid State Drives

Jun 29 2007 5:27PM | Permalink |Comments (14) |


[Moderator note: "Mass Storage: Flash, Magnetic, or Both?", which Joel Weiss discusses in the following writeup, will be the subject of my September 27, 2007 feature article in EDN. Joel and I both welcome your comments on his perspective of this controversial topic.]

Every day seems to bring a new prediction that hard drives will soon go the way of the floppy disk, due to the emergence of solid state drives. I understand the appeal of a good story as much as anyone. But what is the real story with hard drives versus solid state drives? Quite frankly, when you look beyond the hype, it’s clear that hard drives are (and will continue to be) the dominant storage choice.

At IDEMA, we see hard drives and solid state storage as complimentary and cooperative rather than competitive. We believe that the two can co-exist in harmony. Here's why:

  • The cost and capacity of hard drives are unsurpassed, and this advantage is likely to continue in the years to come. Companies are shipping terabyte drives today, providing enormous amounts of storage for around $0.40 per gigabyte, while lower-capacity 400-500 GB drives are selling at on-line retailers for as little as $0.20 per GB. Solid state drives are increasing capacity while reducing cost, but even if this trend continues at the same rate in the future, it will not significantly close the gap that exists with HDD cost and capacity for many years.
  • Hard drives have over 50 years of proven reliability. The high reliability requirements that have been a constant in the HDD industry require very accurate writes that are verifiable. Error rates are on the order of 1 bit per 1000 billion reads. This makes HDDs the preferred storage method for applications where data integrity is not an option, such as the IRS, the defense industry, the DMV, health care, banking, and many others. Before a new drive is shipped to a user, it has undergone stringent internal testing. Typically 50,000 to 200,000 drives are tested internally to ensure reliable operation prior to being released into production and shipped to customers. Conversely, flash drives have to date not had to meet this extremely high reliability rate. An error in your flash drive, which might cause you to miss a bit or pixel in a music or video application, is no big deal. However, if you have stored data-critical applications on flash storage, then it becomes a very big deal.
  • Durability of hard drives has been under-estimated, under-estimating new technology that helps protect the drive. "Free-fall" sensors which can detect that a drive is about to "hit the floor", for example, protect the drive by moving the head to a safe place off the surface of the disk. If you drop your mobile computer, it’s much more likely you will break the LCD display than the hard drive. Sometimes I hear "flash-only" proponents claim that a flash drive can go through the washing machine and still work. Well, I know one man who (accidentally) put his hard drive through both the wash and dry cycle. Guess what? It still worked when he removed it from the dryer. Hard drives are successfully meeting the challenge of more extreme environments and increased shock and vibration demands. As hard drives become standard features in cars, HDDs are built to withstand the heat of an Arizona summer and the frigid cold of an Alaska winter.
  • Technology challenges do exist for both hard drives and solid state drives. The hard drive is no stranger to technology transitions that have enabled it to continue its torrid pace of storage capacity increases in its 50-plus year history. A recent example was the transition to perpendicular recording. New technologies, such as "bit-patterned media" and "heat-assisted magnetic recording" will enable further capacity increases and reliability and durability improvements. The HDD industry has a strong track record when it comes to innovating and implementing new technologies. Technology challenges for solid state drives include narrowing line widths and transitioning to new solid-state storage technologies such as "phase-change". All of these aforementioned technology transitions require substantial investment in technology development and manufacturing scale-up.

Storage is a huge business: the overall storage market is forecasted to be $92 billion in 2007. Of this total, hard drives are projected to be $31 billion, NAND storage to be $34 billion, and NOR to be $8 billion (source: Gartner Forecast February 2007). We believe the real story is that there is not only room for both hard drives and solid state drives in this dynamic industry but new applications will demand even more innovation in the expanding world of content storage.

Joel Weiss
IDEMA


Reader Comments



at 7/1/2007 2:18:01 PM, I love storage said:
This sounds like "party line" loyalty to IDMEA. Yes, their goal is to foster the "Disk" drive business.

Having well over 1TB of hard drives and only a few G of flash drives, I find applications for both. When I used my first 500kB hard drive in 1969 no one could have forseen the 1^6 times increase in capacity for 10-20 times less $.

Similiarly, I don''t know how we can project where either technology will be in 10-20 years.

They likely will both be largely replaced in that time frame on "personal" computers and computing devices with a high speed wireless storage infrastructure of distributed storage warehouses with various levels of speed, security and disaster recovery.

I''m sure that flash or similar solidstate memory will be an integral part of those computing devices, but I''m not so sure about the hard disk drive. I''m guessing that it will be assigned the "workhorse" task of storing data in that invisible distributed storage network--and no, I don''t think that there will be many flash drives in that network.





at 7/18/2007 1:12:11 PM, wb8nbs said:
"Hard drives have over 50 years of proven reliability."

Writer clearly wasn't using Seagate drives in the '90s.



at 7/18/2007 1:20:38 PM, Babuyaya said:
SSD's are the bomb. The ramp up to market integration is just around the corner. Remember the Edsel? The WD's & Seagates of the world will wonder why they are losing market share if they don't incorporate an SSD strategy to their roadmap. Samsung will dominate and emjoy all benefits of being not only an early driver but a dominate force in growing their overall nand market share.>>>Nobody does it better



at 7/18/2007 1:24:59 PM, TMWeditor said:
wb8nbs, I have a 1998 Seagate drive that still works (a Western Digital, too) in a Win98 PC. Nine years, not bad. Then, I had a 160 GB WD drive die in less that two years. Another PC had a HD die on 15 months. There''s a reason I prefer to have my music on CDs, not a hard drive. HDs can crash, which I why I back up all data.



at 7/18/2007 1:25:26 PM, Brian Bailey said:
I think the important point has been missed here, even though I am uncertain of the impact it has on the outcome. Clearly solid state does not replace disk – it will probably never provide the same cost per unit storage unless and until the disk technology comes to a grinding halt. Something else may replace it over time, but for the predictable future it is not worth contemplating. What is changing is that solid state potentially changes the way that we use things. A PC with a solid state drive may result in different behavior patterns that over time change the way that we interact with it. If we look at MP3 players, the transition to solid state made it usable in different ways - people now use it while exercising which was unlikely with a big heavy disk drive, plus it has a significant impact on battery life. So, it is the changes that are enabled by a new technology which are more important, rather than just comparing the attributes of each for the same task.



at 7/18/2007 1:56:39 PM, realist said:
The reality is that the highest capacity HDD''s are not the (volume) sweetspot of HDD sales. The threat to HDD companies will be when that sweetspot is satified by SSD''s and unit volumes drop. SSD''s will obviously have the upper hand in reliability - no way can you say HDD''s will have better error recovery. The reality is also that "solid state" is the "dominant storage choice" - just that the capacities served are lower, but rising (like Apple''s MP3 players, cameras, and cellphones). Whether phase-change brings the real threat to HDD companies remains to be seen and it is healthy to discuss it. HDD companies are not sticking their heads in the sand thinking it will go away. Much of SSD development shares the work done on HDD''s - error recovery, data delivery, and interface standards etc. It is not like they are just starting out.



at 7/18/2007 2:24:43 PM, Technoscan said:
He failed to mention that weight and power requirements are greater for the HDD than for the flash drive. In a world dealing with an energy crisis it would make sense to use technology that is more enviromentally friendly to make and operate.



at 7/19/2007 6:00:19 AM, Rupert said:
I was hoping this article would discuss weight and power requirements. This information would help predict if SSD's will become commonplace in laptop PC's. I expect it will be significantly harder for SSD's to compete with HDD's in desktop PC's.



at 7/19/2007 7:40:30 AM, mozikluv said:
I have no special preference for these 2 forms. As long as it keeps improving, they will always find a way where they best fit.



at 9/19/2007 8:56:01 PM, Bob in Alaska said:
My teenager's thumbdrive has survived TWO washings, but I am not testing an HDD in the washer! As a consumer I want it all: reliability, ease of use, and sufficient storage for the multiplying data. I suspect the best solution will be a combination of both; when MFRs can work together to make the technology seamless, then I will be truly grateful.



at 1/16/2008 3:23:42 PM, CJ said:
What about write durability? Don't flash memories have a limit? HDDs can be written an unlimited number of times.



at 1/17/2008 4:43:28 AM, chicklet said:
The other issue is the reliability of the steering ics used to prevent excessive overwrite of a particular zone of a flash memory(extends the life of the flashdrive). They are not all top shelf and are what mainly separates the men from the boys...



at 1/18/2008 8:44:29 AM, WT said:
HDD is definitely not in the reliable class. I have used a so-called automotive class hdd. Well, it failed right out of the bag. Granted that this is not the norm, I find it difficult to glorify HDD reliability. By definition, HDD is not reliable. The only reason we use it because it is relatively cheap and huge.

DVD and CD do not pair very well either. Supposedly, they have shelf lifetime of 5 to 10 yr. If I recall, it has something to do with the lamination.

SSD has a problem too. It is more expensive and by definition can only retain data for 10yr. So, if your data does not move in 10yrs, you could lose it. However, AFAIK, solid state drive is reliable and much more shock proof. I can't relate to the author's claim about missing bits. It is a known phenomena in HDD and NAND flash. You just use ECC to correct the data. I am not sure what he was thinking.



at 5/20/2008 2:03:18 PM, HybridizeIt said:
I would have liked to have learned more about access rates and seek times. I wonder, too, are we talking about sticks or devices that would plug into the ATA port? What I would like to see is some sort of hybrid-drive. Maybe have an 84Gb HDD where there is a 4Gb SSD that holds just the operating system. Would such a thing allow the 'instant-on' we've been promised?

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites