Suzanne DeffreeWhat's happening in the electronics supply chain that will change the way business is done? News Editor Suzanne Deffree looks at environmental regulations, RFID, inventory levels, globalization, distribution, and a host of other issues that influence the electronics supply chain.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Electronics Supply Chain Articles

Blog

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Industry not prepared for REACH, IPC survey proves

Jul 29 2008 11:35AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (6) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


The IPC released some startling numbers this week, suggesting that the electronics supply chain is not ready for the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) regulation, despite the fact that it took effect on June 1, 2007.

The industry group conducted a survey on REACH preparedness in the North American and European interconnect industry and found that more than 40% of manufacturing and purchasing personnel have no understanding of the REACH regulation as it affects their companies. On top of that, the survey found that the same holds true for nearly one-third of senior management, 29% of engineering personnel, and 28% of environment, health and safety personnel.

Numbers as drastic as these are always shocking. How do you ignore REACH – an EU regulation that puts responsibility on the electronics supply chain to manage the risks from chemicals and to provide safety information on the substances used in electronics – when its impact is expected to be farther reaching than that of ROHS?

ROHS, which stands now at restricting just six substances in electronic products encompassing about 100 different chemicals, is a drop in the bucket compared to the near 30,000 unique chemicals REACH covers. Those 30,000 chemicals impact substances in nearly all applications, and while ROHS can address entire classes of substances at a time, REACH addresses them each individually.

“REACH will have a far-reaching effect on any company that buys sells or uses chemicals,” said Tony Hilvers, VP of industry programs for IPC, in a statement. “Inevitably, all companies that use chemicals or make products that contain chemicals will be affected … and that pretty much sums up the entire electronics supply chain. The survey clearly indicates that our industry is woefully unprepared for the hit it’s about to take.”

As the IPC survey proves, many members of the electronic supply chain have ignored and continue to ignore this regulation. I wish I was surprised by this, but I’m not, especially after this year’s EDS conference in May. While there, I sat down with several distributors and, as they always do, the conversations at one point or another turned to environmental compliance and the electronics supply chain. In one of my first meetings, I asked a distribution exec to clarify a general statement he made using the term “ROHS.” Did he mean China ROHS, EU ROHS, etc.? The reply I got was “American ROHS,” which, as readers of this blog know, doesn’t exist. Shivers crept down my spine and I made it a point to question each company I sat down with on ROHS for the rest of the conference.

For more on REACH, see:

The Official Journal of the European Union's publication of REACH

The European Commission's Enterprise and Industry REACH Web site

EC’s general REACH site, including definition

EDN’s “Dealing with the devil: Could REACH be better than ROHS?”

EDN’s “Is REACH more inclusive and more reasonable than ROHS?”

IPC’s Environmental, Health and Safety Web page

REACH information from SEMI

Sadly, this exec proved to have plenty of company in his ignorance of the environmental regulations targeting the electronics supply chain. While environmental compliance impacts every single person in the global electronics industry, very few seem to have a handle on the regulations. Like ostriches with their heads in the sand, many companies count on their partners to take care of business or have appointed one or two employees to cover all of the broad-reaching environmental compliance initiatives, and from ROHS, to REACH, to the state laws here in the US, to WEEE, to EUP, to POHS, the list continues to grow.

The IPC’s electronic survey was sent to executives throughout the electronic interconnect supply chain in North America and Europe, and shows that even with a deadline for pre-registration of substances quickly approaching, only 18.3% of companies have identified and/or inventoried all substances in their products. More so, only 60.5% of chemical supplier respondents are planning to register or pre-register substances at all, the survey data revealed.

For those out there who aren’t up to speed on REACH, to the right are a few links you should visit. Further, IPC has scheduled a number of programs in the coming months, including a September 18 REACH Critical Update Webcast on pre-registration issues for PCB and EMS suppliers, and a number of sessions and meetings on REACH and other environmental issues at IPC Midwest Conference & Exhibition, September 21 to 25. Info on those efforts can be found at IPC’s Web site.

The full report on IPC’s REACH preparedness survey is available here.

Share your thoughts on REACH and industry preparedness below. Is the electronics supply chain equipped with the knowledge it needs to incorporate REACH, as well as the various other regulations, into our global industry?


Reader Comments


at 7/29/2008 7:00:14 PM, M. Simon said:
All these rules ROHS etc. are part of a system to drive small competitors and start ups out of the market in the guise of pollution protection.<br><br> My preference is for the American rules.<br><br> When a company gets large enough that significant exports to the EU are worth it it can start a "follow the rules" group and appoint a VP to monitor progress.

at 7/29/2008 7:54:02 PM, M. Simon said:
The same thing is being done to cripple American energy supplies. The cheapest mitigation for CO2 (assuming man made CO2 is the cause of any thing other than improving plant growth) is to plant trees. However, under Kyoto tree planting doesn''t count. The only things that count are things that increase the cost of electrical energy or reduce supplies. Wisely China, India, the rest of the third world and Ta.Da. Europe are ignoring Kyoto and building coal fired plants for electricity. As is Saudi Arabia. In this case we would be wise to follow Europe''s lead and ignore Kyoto and follow on treaties.

at 7/30/2008 2:21:01 AM, Jed A. Peeler said:
Mr. Simon is totally correct; the only reason for the CE Mark, REACH, and ROHS, is to keep small companies out of the European market. The U.S. needs countermeasures to these attacks on our economy. No more one way trade!

at 7/31/2008 6:40:12 PM, Richard Kubin said:
I must disagree with much of the content of this article. REACH is all about controlling the chemicals that enter the EU, and is primarily focused on "raw" chemicals. Yes, companies that actually manufacture (semicon, PCBs, PCBAs) in the EU and use process chemicals will be impacted, but they (EU) couldn''t care less what chemicals you use in the US or China. Also, there is no need for every employee to understand the implications, only a few who are the responsible "gatekeepers". Using the argument given, one could say that every employee of a public US company should know the details of Sarbanes-Oxley. While most understand the basic intent, how many know the detail of section 409 and Form 8-K Disclosure Requirements?

at 8/1/2008 12:08:04 AM, Seb said:
I agree that REACH is a bit extreme; however the aim of securing health and environment is a decent one. The only thing is that this Regulation is not offering flexibility or choices to Traders (majority in sourcing business of consumer goods, nowadays) and costs make this regulation look like a money-maker... but saying that US is better because they don't control anything is not a good argument. the US is now implementing new laws because of consumer organization who are fed up of getting crap and unsafe products.. that's a good move

at 8/5/2008 11:52:33 AM, Mal said:
REACH is decidedly 'over the top'. However to say that it is intended to keep small US companies out of Europe is paranoia gone mad. What do you think it will do to small EU companies? The answer is not to be a manufacurer or an importer IN EUROPE. Then all you have to do is give data to those that are.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites