Zibb

Suzanne DeffreeWhat's happening in the electronics supply chain that will change the way business is done? News Editor Suzanne Deffree looks at environmental regulations, RFID, inventory levels, globalization, distribution, and a host of other issues that influence the electronics supply chain.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Electronics Supply Chain Articles

Blog

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Countering China’s counterfeit components

Jul 16 2008 6:40PM | Permalink |Comments (9) |


There’s a newly implemented system in China to thwart counterfeit components. Blessed by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) and jointly supported by the China Quality Management Association for the Electronics Industry (CQAE) and the China Electronic Purchasing Association (CEPA), the Reliable Electronic Component Suppliers (RECS) system certifies and authenticates electronic component manufacturers and authorized distributors that provide products from legal and reliable sources.

Numbers concerning counterfeiting vary from source to source, as do the suggested ways to defend the electronics supply chain against these fake components. In late 2007, the US Patent and Trademark Office estimated that counterfeiting and piracy drain about $250 billion out of the US economy each year along with some 750,000 jobs.

NEDA’s Robin Gray, a top resource on the subject, continues to note counterfeit components as a key concern for authorized distributors. While NEDA maintains that the best way to avoid counterfeit product is to stick with authorized distributors, pockets of chip manufactures, OEMs, and CEMs have cropped up in the electronics supply chain forming their own Web sites and groups that they claim can weed out counterfeit product. The SIA is also looking to protect the industry against counterfeit product. The group in April released a directory of authorized distributors as part of a larger campaign that involves working with customs authorities to seize counterfeits at the borders and encouraging the authentication of legitimate products.

While the proposed ways to safeguard the electronics supply chain against counterfeiting components differ, almost all point the finger at the China electronics industry as a main source of the problem. (Of course, while it may be a main source of counterfeit goods, China’s electronics industry is also one of the biggest in the world and a key driver for any growth components makers see.)

RECS was established in response the growing trend of counterfeit products in China and “is designed to promote legitimate product sources and educate China electronic purchasers to buy from reliable sources of electronics components while ensuring the reliability and traceability of product sources.” That’s according to a release from Avnet Electronics Marketing that hit the wires Tuesday, of course promoting the fact that Avnet Electronics Marketing China is one of the first authorized electronics distributors to be qualified under the RECS system. Premier Electronics, a Premier Farnell company, is also listed on the CEPA site, as well as brands like ADI, Freescale, and NXP.

Thus far, information from reliable sources on RECS is scarce -- at least, information that’s been translated into English. So if you have any info on RECS, drop me a line at sdeffree@reedbusiness.com. Meanwhile, voice your thoughts on the system and China counterfeit problem below.


Reader Comments



at 7/21/2008 9:19:02 AM, Jennifer Read said:
Excellent article -- but these measures are unlikely to mitigate the risks of manufacturing electronics in the so-called 'low labor cost' regions. Rather than continuing to chase low labor rates -- a small percentage of the cost of electronics -- Charlie Barnhart & Associates, (charliebarnhart.com) research points to a return to a more rational, 'total cost' regional strategy for electronics outsourcing, and many clients are pursuing that approach to offset escalating transportation costs and the falling value of the dollar.



at 7/22/2008 3:05:26 PM, BOB WEISE said:
Procuring components of any description from the counterfeit center of the world is like leaving your front door unlocked and wondering why you were robbed. When are we going to realize that America is the only country in the world that follows the rules? Sourcing traceability is way down the list of other ignored laws, licensing and standards in the rush to grab our currency sponsored and encouraged by the Chinese leadership.



at 7/23/2008 12:01:11 AM, Battar said:
I'm not sure the impact on the local market is as great asa suggested. The most likely purchasers of low cost counterfiet components are manufacturers of low cost, low reliability "throw-away" goods like toys. We are not unduly concerned if our $15 remote control toy car lasts only 8 weeks - we wouldn't have bought it if it cost $25. As a manufacturer of premium consumer goods, I wouldn't risk my reputation dealing with shady suppliers.



at 7/29/2008 5:39:52 PM, Don Wilder said:
It seems to me we are a few decades too late in trying to stem the tide of the counterfeit products. We have transferred technology to the areas in an effort to produce parts in a cost efficient manner. To me this was the Blue Print for the current situation. Now the flood gates are open and without the proper amount of pressure to change the level of commitment within the governments like total closing of the trade route, it is unlikely to change to amount to anything at all.



at 8/1/2008 9:01:19 AM, 888@aol.com said:
No trade with China. Nuke them
now.



at 8/4/2008 7:10:21 PM, Sean Noble said:
Over the years counterfeit products have been supplied to every country in the world. Even though China is the most likely to be shipping such goods out, you cannot be sure on the origin of goods when buying now.



at 9/5/2008 5:47:14 PM, John B said:
@ Battar:

The difficulty comes from outsourcing. When contract manufacturers make such a substantial part of their total margins from positive price variance, it's almost impossible for the OEM brand owner to control where the CM's buyers get their parts. Once the insurance companies start to clue in and the CFO's start looking closely at warranty returns due to counterfeit, OEM's will actually start to do something about the problem.



at 9/9/2008 2:55:02 AM, D r said:
As long as everybody has the mentality of building long term relationships with your customer then this problem will go away....not anytime soon but it will happen. Why take the risk on LTC/MAxim/AD to make a few dollars? Stop buying from unknown brokers and keep dealing with known names. Qualification is everything. When the greed stops, so will the counterfieting.



at 10/3/2008 4:20:17 PM, Andy H said:
Working for a Sub contract manufacturer in the UK, my component sources have been 99.9% reliable and the only product taht we have been touched by in 15 years have been AD device AD637SQ/883B, which as a military device (counterfeit) concerns me more than the commercial counterfiets that have been hitting the market from the far east. Though we all have to source through the grey market and use ERAI resellers if possible there is always the possibility that risks are taken to make a quick buck, my source was East coast USA. This problem will linger for years to come Im afraid unless the chinese/Asian markets REALLY do clamp down but with the economic situation presently in the world this is highly unlikely.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites