Zibb

Alexander E. Braun’s blog focuses on current metrology issues and developments in the rapidly advancing fields of inspection, measurement and test, and evaluates their relevance and impact on the global semiconductor industry. Occasionally, he will growl, grumble and comment on other matters and subjects that may innocently and foolishly meander too close to his gunsights.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Monday, February 9, 2009

A Trillion Here, a Trillion There: A Study in Perspective

Feb 9 2009 3:52PM | Permalink |Comments (18) |


Regardless of what you might think about the idea of a stimulus package to get moving the currently disastrous U.S. economy, seen from a purely mathematical perspective a million (much less a trillion!) of anything is a rather difficult concept for the human mind to grasp—the magnitude is meaningless.

One of my most favorite people, Sherlock Holmes, once complained to his friend and biographer, Dr. John H. Watson, "Data! Data! Data! I can make no bricks without clay!" It occurred to me that perhaps there was a way to break down the even more difficult concept of a trillion by framing it into somewhat more understandable data "bricks."



Even Sherlock Holmes would agree that a trillion's magnitude
is not so elementary.

So, what is a trillion besides a 1 followed by 12 zeroes?

A trillion seconds add up to 31,710 years. If you started your count while Egypt’s Great Pyramid was being built, you’d have over 26,000 years to go.

If you wanted your trillion dollars in $100 bills, you’d have to carry off 10,000,000,000 bills. This roughly adds up to 9,370 tons of paper—the U-Haul folks will love you!

Stacked one on top of the other a column of those $100 bills would reach 631 miles up, endangering low-orbit traffic, such as Shuttle flights, the International Space Station, and the Hubble Space Telescope.

As the Earth spins on its axis, the poles trace a circle
on the sky, like a top running down. This "precession
of the equinoxes" lasts some 26,000 years and shifts
our view of the starfield, changing the North Star. It
was Thuban 5,000 years ago, Polaris today, and will
be Vega in 12,000 years. While you were counting
to a trillion, you would see all three stars occupy
that position, and still have some counting left to do.

If you got your trillion in $1.00 bills, you could construct a wall of bills (laid on their edges) four feet high extending from New York to San Francisco.

It you used a trillion bricks instead of dollars, you could build a wall that not even the ITRS Roadmap considered—it would be 100 feet tall and 60 bricks thick and go around the Earth’s equator.

A trillion dollars, equally divided among the inhabitants of the U.S. would give everyone $3,333.

A car going at 65 miles per hour would take 1,756,235 years to travel a trillion miles.

It would still take a beam of light, speeding at 186,282 miles per second, two months to do it.



It would require the resources of 30 Bill Gates to pony up one
trillion dollars. Source: Microsoft.


A trillion is 9 times the number of people born since the appearance of homo sapiens.

A trillion gallons of water would fill 1,666,667 official Olympic-size swimming pools.

A trillion M&Ms is 7 years’ worth of this candy’s worldwide production.

A trillion gallons of gas could meet U.S. consumption for more than 85 years.

A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon we’re talking about serious numbers…


Related entries in: Channels - Top Stories | Home Page - Featured Blogs | Home Page - Top Stories | Inspection, Measurement & Test | Semiconductor Production & Manufacturing | SI - Premium Site | Topical Taxonomy--Electronics | 


Reader Comments



at 2/9/2009 6:39:29 PM, SiGuy said:
Wow! It *is* more than just 10^12!!!!



at 2/9/2009 9:33:52 PM, JohnR said:
I hope that the politicians read this. They need the perspective!



at 2/10/2009 2:21:24 AM, JohnF said:
I wish the Politicians would just have a rudimentary inkling of the magnitude of $1 Trillion. More important, it would be nice if THEY would be the ones that would have to repay this debt. Their voting considerations may change.



at 2/10/2009 9:11:18 AM, James Aoyama said:
The sheer magnitude of the number is beyond understanding. Thanks for the perspective. I only hope Washington reads your blog!



at 2/10/2009 2:23:32 PM, 1Geek said:
I think sometimes that the politicians don't know what they're dealing with. Too many lawyers and too few engineers. (:<



at 2/10/2009 2:26:05 PM, Rick Krauze said:
I printed your blog for my son. He's going to use it in his math class.



at 2/10/2009 2:41:04 PM, LOOKCLOSER said:
The problem is that its not going to be just ONE trillion.



at 2/11/2009 9:42:49 AM, Fred Farys said:
The government is talking about spending on 'shovel ready' jobs. What about high tech? Silicon Valley is dying and I think we contribute more to the economy than a road built in some backwater state.



at 2/11/2009 10:54:41 AM, Jason Latimer said:
You and I are of a "certain age," Dr. Braun. We went to school when kids were taught how to think and manipulate data, instead of blindly accepting as gospel everything that someone in authority spoon fed them. I'll bet you did this in a couple of hours just sitting with your calculator and asking "What if?"



at 2/11/2009 11:24:31 AM, Ernest Rejman said:
You make it sound "Elementary, my dear Watson!" [:-)



at 2/11/2009 12:05:43 PM, Krzysztof Majczak said:
Very interesting, but...
Let's put it in yet another perspective: advertising business in USA is more than 180 billions of dollars per year. Which means that we all - private people and businesses - pay every year more than that on top of what products and services are really worth.
Consider this - our 1 trillion dollars bailout is just FIVE times more than what we already pay for (almost) nothing.



at 2/11/2009 4:20:54 PM, Walt Rutenbar said:
Politicians act as if the 12 zeros were to the left instead of the right of the decimal point! They have no concept of what they're leading us to, and we're responsible for letting them do it. Vote them all out!



at 2/13/2009 12:25:18 PM, Jay Stern said:
Why doesn't the mainstream media come up with stuff like this? Of what good are newspapers and TV news if they don't put things like this in perspective for their readers and viewers?



at 2/13/2009 4:19:38 PM, Doc D said:
We're doomed.



at 2/13/2009 4:24:32 PM, Charles Koh said:
It always amazes me how incapable the average person is of doing even simple arithmetic! Can't anybody figure things out any more? Must they always depend on others for facts? DO THE BLEEPING MATH!!!



at 2/19/2009 6:06:13 AM, Boggled said:
The politicians did the math. Didn't you see the pictures of the dollar bills stacked to the moon or around the earth? The same politicians did not do the math when they approved similar spending without the income over the last 8 years. 'Mainstream media' covered this. The comment on advertising dollars is on the right track, too.



at 2/20/2009 10:58:08 AM, WGS said:
My grandfather used to tell us stories how, in the early 1920, after Germany had lost the war and experienced hyperinflation, one dollar would get you a trillion marks, and a wheelbarrow full of money wouldn't even buy a loaf of bread. Is that our future?



at 3/9/2009 4:42:23 PM, Sacha Potapenko said:
Great perspective, thank you. Also I like your picture of Sherlock Holmes. He is very popular in Russia and has a statue in Moscow.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites