Nov 3 2009 7:21AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (0) |
Yesterday at ICCAD, Jim Hogan and I led an discussion on the megatrends facing electronics and the implications going forward for EDA. Basically we took a leaf out of Scoop Nisker's book, who when he finished reading the news would sign off with "if you don't like the news go out and make some of your own." So we tried to.
Anyone whose being reading this blog regularly won't be surprised at the position that we took. I managed to find some interesting data from Morgan Stanley about how electronics is growing but it is also fragmenting. PCs ship in 100s of millions; cell-phones in billions (t...Read More
Oct 29 2009 4:06PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (2) |
Oct 29 2009 3:59PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
I spent part of last Tuesday at the Cadence mixed-signal workshop. I went mainly out of interest to see how things had progressed since I worked at Cadence. I had been put in charge of what we called the Superchip project, which was actually integrating together the custom design and the digital synthesis, place & route design to get them into a single design environment. The heart of the problem was to get both systems onto a single database for mixed signal design. This turned out to be immensely complicated since the basic semantics of the two design databases were so different, and nobody in the company had a deep understanding of both of them.Oct 28 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
I caught up with Dave Stewart and Skip Hovsmith of CriticalBlue (from Edinburgh, yay, one of my alma maters). They originally developed technology to take software and pull it out of the code and implement it in gates. They had some limited success with this. But now they have refocused their technology on the problem of taking legacy code and helping make it multicore ready with their Prism tool.Oct 26 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
I went to Mike Muller’s keynote at ARM’s techcon3. He started with an interesting retrospective on ARM. They have shipped 15B units (4B in 2008 alone). They have 20+ processor cores, 600+ licensees. In the next 3 or 4 years they will ship another 15B units. It’s not far off to say that “almost all” microprocessors are ARMs (by unit count).Oct 23 2009 11:58AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (7) |
I was at the ARM developer conference this week. Actually it has been renamed and is now called Techcon3, which seems pretty generic as branding. Anyway, one of the keynotes was by TJ Rodgers who started off by telling us more than we wanted to know about how he is using software and hardware to try and make the new world’s best pinot noir (he’s conceded that DRC is too hard to beat, but that’s old world). However, there was a serious point: he used Cypress PSoCs (programmable systems on chip) to implement the hardware, which was a use not envisaged when the hardware was designed.Oct 17 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
It was only a couple of weeks ago that I was writing about software-signoff and FPGAs. I mentioned that Synopsys didn’t really have any high-level synthesis. Rumor has it that they do have sequential formal verification in development. Anyway, on Monday they announced Synphony which they position as high-level synthesis. Synopsys has musical product names now, not just Cadence.Oct 14 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (0) |
Virage is on a roll right now. Originally a standard cell and memory company, it recently acquired a microprocessor line with ARC and now it has acquired another big increase in its size by taking on a lot of the analog IP from NXP and a large development group in Eindhoven. An off-topic aside: if you ever go to Eindhoven (or the Netherlands in general) make sure to have Indonesian food. It’s wonderful and really flavorful, and the local Dutch food sets a low bar to clear. Rijstafel is the magic word.Oct 13 2009 2:36PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (6) |
I talked a couple of weeks ago about how it is necessary to be brutal and cull the managers of internal products in an acquisition otherwise the management of the joint product roadmap would become completely dysfunctional.Oct 8 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (10) |
There was a reason I wrote about biometrics trecently. I have a new job as COO (and VP marketing) at Biogy, which is a biometrics company. Already I’ve become a biometrics bore. But that means I don’t really have time any more to be an EDA bore as well, not to mention that since I’ll be spending less time in the EDA milieu I won’t have anything interesting to say about it any more. Okay, I set myself up for comments about not having anything interesting to say anyway, in which case why are you here reading this? Biogy isn't fully funded so I'm not getting paid yet so I'm still interested in EDA consulting opportunities.
Anyway, time will tell how this all plays out. Maybe the gravitational attraction vortex of EDA will once again prove too much and I’ll be ba...Read More
Oct 7 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (3) |
I was at a biometrics conference in Florida the week before last. The state of the art is much more advanced than I realized in many areas.
For example, iris recognition can be done at a distance of a couple of meters. You just look at a screen for a second or two and the system can identify who you are and thus whether you are approved to enter, or whatever. In a self-contained unit, the unit itself can store 100,000 people. With a back-end database there can be millions or even hundreds of millions and identification still takes place in under 2 seconds. This is still what is called cooperative recognition, where the person being identified follows instructions, opens their eyes, takes off their glasses (although it has a pretty good recognition rate even if you d...Read More
Oct 6 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (9) |
When a company acquires another one, not just in EDA, there is often an internal group already doing something similar. For example, Intuit has just acquired mint.com and they already have a product, Quicken Online that competes in pretty much the same space. So how to merge the companies and the products?
Be ruthless and cull all the director-level management of the existing product (Quicken Online in this case). Put the managers of the acquired product in charge.
This is one thing that I learned at Cadence (you might have noticed that Cadence has done a fair number of acquisitions over the years, to say the least). The first thing to do is to lay off all the managers responsible for the internal competing product. They will inevitably try and sabotage the acquisition in more or l...Read More
Oct 5 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
What are biometrics? It is authenticating people by some aspect of their body, typically fingerprints (or finger vein), iris scan or voice recognition. I think that it will become much more important in the coming years since it offers a painless way to get increased security.
As I talked about earlier, security is hard and people think it isn‘t. In the military and internally in big companies, the way that security works can be mandated. Even then there are regular stories of unencrypted disks going missing in the mail, or credit card databases being stolen wholesale. But in the consumer world there is a different issue: if the consumers find it too ...Read More
Oct 2 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (3) |
I’ve been reading a very interesting book called “The Flaw of Averages” by Sam Savage. It looks at why using average data only produces the correct answers in very limited circumstances. The flaw of averages is that plans based on average assumptions are, on average, wrong.
For example, assume you are a manager deciding how big a factory (or fab) to build. Your marketing manager tells you he is certain that you’ll s...Read More
Oct 1 2009 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (3) |
You’ve probably tried to explain to somebody the unbelievable scale of what it takes to design a modern chip with hundreds of millions or billions of transistors. But even we have difficulty with numbers when they get that large, like when we hear that there are 500 billion galaxies in the universe. Large numbers just don’t have that much impact. What’s another trillion dollars on the national debt? One way to make that one clearer is that it is roughly the amount taken in annually in income tax. So $1T of debt means one year of everyone in the country paying double their tax.
I was talking to an architect yesterday evening who was familiar with AutoCAD ($3K/seat!) for 3D design and she was asking how similar that was to IC design.
The usual ...Read More