This blog, written by former Electronic Business Executive Editor Debra Bulkeley, is now inactive.


Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Business Strategy Articles

Blog

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Europe's ruling on Microsoft: It's not only about them

Sep 19 2007 12:00AM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (1) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


It’s tough when the rules are rewritten and what you thought was, isn’t anymore. That’s what happened to Microsoft this week.

The Court of First Instance in Luxembourg said the European Commission acted properly in 2004 when it found that Microsoft had abused its near-monopoly position. Microsoft’s bill in fines and penalties could reportedly reach $2.77 billion.

What will this ruling mean to other tech cases? Does this spell trouble ahead for Apple, which dominates online music downloads? What about Intel?

In its summary, the Court reiterated that Microsoft had abused its market power by bundling a digital media player to Windows, and denied competitors information they needed to make their computers compatible with Microsoft’s software. The Court also told Microsoft to obey a March 2004 Commission order to share confidential computer code with competitors.

Will this ruling stifle others from innovating? Will companies need to think differently about what features they add to products for certain regions of the world? Intel and Rambus are probably watching the developments from this ruling very carefully. The European Union brought a case against Intel this summer and accused it of using marketing incentives to deter customers form dealing with Advanced Micro Devices. As for Rambus, the European Union is looking into the company’s alleged manipulation of standard-setting bodies to lock in patent royalties. (See this Wall Street Journal article for more details and coverage of the ruling.)

This antitrust ruling will undoubtedly result in many companies deciding to reexamine their business practices for the European market—and other markets around the globe. On the other hand, the ruling could be a positive development for innovative smaller companies.

How the ruling will impact other dominant companies and the way they conduct business around the world is yet to be seen. Do you see this ruling as a good thing for tech companies, and business in general?


Related entries in: Business Strategy | EDN Network Communities | Webzines | 


Reader Comments


at 9/20/2007 7:44:19 AM, Ex-Brussels said:
The last 2 Compettion Commissioners are ignorant of the fact that the European Commission promoted with billiosn of Euros the need for companies to integrate their technoligies around the digital highway. Indeed, having worked there on this very issue I know that MicroSoft was one of the few to achieve what the European Commission was advocating. This is why going after MicroSoft on the media device is completely dishonest. The European Courts are highly politicized, especially during the last 2 enlargements with now 37% of their judges coming from former one party states (they have not changed their bad habits). This is why many British people are worried about increasing EU powers. The overall response to commercial interests rather than consumer interests is only a confirmation of a basic corruption in the system. MicroSoft has a far stronger case but I have been unable to penetrate their massive infrastructure to gain access to the people who decide these things.

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites