Zibb

This blog, written by former Electronic Business Executive Editor Debra Bulkeley, is now inactive.



   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Business Strategy Articles

Blog

Friday, September 14, 2007

Let's kick leadership up a notch

Sep 14 2007 7:09AM | Permalink |Comments (5) |


A leader does something that he knows is wrong, but he does it anyway and maybe more than once. Then he gets caught.

Last night I learned about the punishment that the NFL commissioner imposed on Coach Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots for using videotape to try to steal the New York Jets’ signals during last Sunday’s game. The storied franchise’s reputation is now tarnished (new label: “cheaters”), and this is probably just the beginning of the story.

I thought of the similarities between Belichick’s behavior and the behavior of several executives that has come to light in the past year. For some reason some CEOs also think it’s okay to cheat and lie and break the rules (read: backdating stock options). In many cases what ends up happening, in my opinion, is their arrogance just catches up with them, and they get caught. And then some decide to deny and backpedal.

The poster boy (right now, at least) for refusing to admit any wrongdoing in our industry is Gregory L. Reyes, the former CEO of San Jose-based network storage solutions provider Brocade Communications Systems. Reyes was convicted in August of one count of conspiracy, four counts of securities fraud, four counts of lying to accountants and one count of false books and records relating to his alleged scheme to backdate options grants to Brocade employees. Reyes’ major downfall? He persistently refused to admit he participated in or had any knowledge of the backdating, despite mounting evidence turned up by internal probes of the company. (His sentencing is scheduled for November 21.)

Of course there are plenty of executives who don’t lie or cheat. And I appreciate the fact that corporate leaders today are under tremendous pressures to meet their earnings expectations and stay ahead of the competition. In today’s increasingly global market it’s a challenge for some companies to track all their competitors since new ones can appear out of nowhere (Apple in the phone business?). Having strong leadership skills and improving on them is a work in progress, as executive coach, Susan Meyers, has written in her article, "How engineers, executives can improve their leadership muscle."

I think many of us hold our executives in high regard—they got where they are for good reason. And their achievements are celebrated, and I think they should be. I want to hear more of the great things they do in the months to come, and look forward to writing about them here.

As for Belichick and the Patriots, they now have to live with the consequences of cheating and getting caught.


Related entries in: Business Centers | Business Strategy | EDN Network Communities | Webzines | 


Reader Comments



at 9/14/2007 8:05:10 AM, ooh please said:
<<For some reason some CEOs also think it’s okay to cheat and lie and break the rules (read: backdating stock options).>>

I've got an idea, how about lets kick journalism up a notch? The stock options backdating "scandal" is basically about stock options for employees that have been implemented the same way for at least 20 years (that is- when a new hire joins a company he/she is given stock at the lowest price of the quarter backdated to his start date). I would virtue to guess most readers of this publication have received employee stock options of this type in their lifetime. The feds are calling these plans, which have NEVER historically been expensed at *any company* including Microsoft- fraud. Any CEO on trial for anything will be convicted these days, so a guilty verdict is pretty meaningless. These stock option witchhunts which are about EMPLOYEE stock option plans will cost our industry dearly. If commentators like you actually researched the matter we'd be better off.



at 9/14/2007 8:11:48 AM, ooh please said:
By the way I forgot to mention in the recent Reyes case, which I am watching only because KLA Tencor has also been charged- the government actually LIED in their closing arguments telling the jury that the CEO hid the stock paperwork from the finance department, and then one week later, the government actually charged the CFO of Brocade.

How about we kick our GOVERNMENT up a notch?



at 9/18/2007 9:49:05 AM, brb said:
It's not about 20 yrs of back dating stock or that it's done for the employees.

It's about intentionally subverting their financial statements to the SEC. Back dating stock options are legal if truthfully shown in the financial statements.



at 9/18/2007 10:56:14 AM, anon said:
Since nobody ever expensed employee stock option plans and they have been implemented this way since the 70s, when were they supposed to start reporting to the SEC? Did the rules change and when did they change? I had backdated employee stock options at Apple in 1985, those weren't expensed. Just the fact that these plans existed for so many years without expensing (apparently legally since I don't see anybody indicting Gene Amdahl or Gordon Moore) then its hard to see how non reporting this is criminal. It seems like much more of an oversight to me with a lot of riled up, misleading business journalism.



at 9/18/2007 11:04:11 AM, Oregonian said:
Anybody that works in the tech industry that is applauding this ruling is cutting off their nose to spite their face. Employee options plans are the lifeblood of the semiconductor industry, and as others have mentioned for whatever reason they were never, ever expensed. It is silly to think that Brocade, a latecomer and small company would think to sway from standard industry practice and start expensing when nobody else was doing it. And to call this criminal is really a stretch. Now that the feds have come in with their sledgehammer to right the wrongs on employee stock plans, this will only cause those plans to diminish in our industry. And journalism such as this contributes to the damage done.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites