Steve LeibsonLeibson's Law: It takes 10 years for any disruptive technology to become pervasive in the design community. This blog is about the disruptive technologies that either have or will win over electronic engineers, some that won't, and why. Written by Steve Leibson, Tensilica's Technology Evangelist. See my history site at www.hp9825.com. You can email me by taking the first letter of my first name, appending that to my last name, then the magic email symbol, followed by the name of the company I work for, and then a dot followed by com.

View Steve Leibson's profile on LinkedIn

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Fujifilm Expands Camera Dynamic Range with Dual-Readout Super CCD EXR

Sep 23 2008 4:03PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (3) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


Although introduced yesterday, I’ve held off writing this blog entry until I think I understand what’s happening in Fujifilm’s new Super CCD EXR image sensor, which touts high dynamic range (HDR). Fujifilm has been producing HDR CCD sensors for a few years now. The first one that caught my eye was the company’s Super CCD SR, which placed a big photosensor and a smaller photosensor at each pixel site. The big “S” sensor had a higher charge capacity, so it could accommodate brighter incident light. The smaller “R” sensor was electrically shallower, so shadows in the image could fill it more deeply since it needed fewer incident photons to fill the small sensor with electrons.

As a result, the small sensors were excellent for shadow detail while the large sensors could handle the image highlights. I thought it was a neat trick and a nice design, but it never took the market by storm as far as I could tell. In the megapixel wars, more megapixels sells to the average consumer more easily than “high dynamic range,” which your average camera buyer won’t understand and therefore won’t buy.

Fast forward to the year 2008—today. There are many more camera enthusiasts interested in HDR photography, thanks to some pioneers who have published stunningly beautiful HDR images. (Take a look at Sean McHugh’s beautiful HDR images taken in and around Cambridge University at his site here.) However, today’s HDR images are composites of three, five, or more images shot with bracketed aperture and then overlaid and mixed in popular image-editing packages such as Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro, or Photomatix.

Now, Fujifilm is giving HDR another shot with the new Super CCD EXR sensor. This sensor has only one size pixel but two tricks eke HDR out of the same-sized pixel sensors. The first trick is a rearrangement of the conventional Bayer color-pixel distribution so that there are always at least two adjacent pixels of the same color, as shown below. This arrangement allows the camera to read the CCD sensor twice by interrogating half of the pixels at one point and the rest at a later time. The pixels interrogated early are consequently less sensitive to light and are used to pick up image highlights. The sensor sites read later have more time to accumulate charge for dimly lit areas. The result: an HDR image with “one” exposure.

 

 

Fujifilm has not yet introduced a camera using this technology but the company has said that the Super CCD EXR sensor will initially appear in a 12-Mpixel premium FinePix compact camera with a 1/1.6" sensor. The camera will launch in the spring of 2009. This camera wil presumably be able to operate its 12-Mpixel Super CCD EXR sensor in two modes: a high-resolution mode with normal dynamic range using all 12 Mpixels in a similar manner and a high-dynamic-range mode that devotes half of the sensor's pixels to dynamic-range expansion. Although I've been interested in HDR imaging for years, this latest innovation is particularly interesting to me this week because I'm currently writing a white paper on pre- and post-processing algorithms used in imaging. Fujifilm's Super CCD EXR sensor adds yet another new dimension to this fascinating topic and the introduction of this sensor further illustrates the synergistic fusion of silicon sensor technology and advanced image processing.


Related entries in: Consumer Products | Digital Camera | 


Reader Comments


at 9/24/2008 2:19:08 PM, Chris PE said:
It sounds great. I am a Fuji user and I love their cameras. I do not belong to Cannon followers, because being an electronic engineer I know a drawbacks of CMOS in general.Fuji is a high technology company which makes their own products , as well as Olympus. Through the years I had 6 Fuji cameras without any problems and 4 Cannon with "green rot" of a cheap CCD that they purchased from a OEM generic supplier.Cannon was giving me a hard time with what was obviously their responsibility.I also had a cheap Apex camera and they just replaced it when all my pictures turned purple-green.Fuji has it's own sensors and behind a scene they hold hands with Sony on CCD development.I am glad that format holds , because with CMOS signal is manipulated, extrapolated , filtered and of course compressed. Some like it , I don't.As a personal opinion I do have to admit that only Fuji and Sony have a beautiful reproduction of blue and green , although maybe a bit shy on red in some cameras.That's just my opinion.I see a possibility of a great sharpness and color reproduction improvement with a new Super CCD EXR sensor.Thank you for an interesting article.

at 9/25/2008 7:14:13 PM, markus said:
Ouch. Hate to correct and clarify, but here goes. On the Super CCD SR sensor the larger (S)ensitivity photodiode picks up shadow detail and blows out highlights in high contrast shots. The small (R)ange photodiode is so far less sensitive, over the same period of exposure, that the respective dark areas are lost, and the underexposed highlights are preserved. The digital trickery in the processor restores detail to the blown-out highlights in the (S) channel using underexposed data from the (R) channel. The fact that the larger photodiode can collect a higher charge is not what extends the range. To the contrary, so many more photons strike the larger site in proportion to the smaller site, over the same duration, that the disproproportionally faster (S) site is expected to max out sooner in high contrast exposures. The impression you get is that the large photodiodes are over-sensitive to strong light. To compensate, you can shorten what is already a very short exposure to capture highlights, at the price, perhaps, of lost range at the dark end. To reclaim the lost range you can do two things. You can bin the pixels in the dark areas where high-resolution is hard if not impossible for the eye to pick out, and you can also extend the exposure ever so slightly, resample the sensor, and compare the results. You would have to stick with binning if movement could be detected in what was already a very fast shutter. Without movement, the extended exposure would render the darker areas at full resolution and the binned pixels could be used for superior noise reduction in dark areas. I think this sensor is only sort of simultaneous and somewhat sequential when it really matters in fast, highly lit, contrasty shots.

at 9/26/2008 11:01:01 AM, Steve Leibson said:
Markus, thanks. I appreciate the correction. Don't know how I got it backwards, but it's not the first time. :-)

Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites