Advertisement

Zibb

Steve LeibsonLeibson's Law: It takes 10 years for any disruptive technology to become pervasive in the design community. This blog is about the disruptive technologies that either have or will win over electronic engineers, some that won't, and why. Please feel free to link to these blog entries! Written by Steve Leibson, a freelance content creator and marketing/lead-generation consultant specializing in high-tech companies, former VP of Content for Reed Business, and former Editor in Chief of three publications including EDN. See my consulting Web site at www.sleibson.com and my history site at www.hp9825.com. You can email me at steven.leibson followed by the magic email symbol @ followed by att.net.

View Steve Leibson's profile on LinkedIn


   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Blogging at DAC 2008

Jun 12 2008 5:52PM | Permalink |Comments (3) |


Last night, a lot of people met at a Birds-of-a-Feather (BoF) event for EDA bloggers. The emcee was JL Gray, who is one of 60 or so bloggers covering the myriad aspects of EDA.  Gray organized the event with help from Sean Murphy, Harry Gries, David Lin, John Ford, and Ron Ploof. The main discussions last night centered around what does and does not constitute a blog, what’s the difference between a blogger and a “real journalist,” and just who is running this show. Here are my opinions on these questions:

  1. A blog is whatever I say it is. (Apologies to Lewis Carrol.) Some bloggers are big into hyperlinking. Some aren’t. Some write infrequently. Some feel compelled to “feed the beast.” Some have narrow interests. Some bloggers’ interests are wide ranging. John Cooley sends out emails and doesn’t rely on blogging software. So what? All of these people are conveying information and opinions about EDA and electronic system design.
  2. The difference between a blogger and a “real journalist” isn’t clear cut. Some implied that the difference is one of journalistic ethics. I’m not having any of that. In some ways, bloggers are less constrained and are freer to write what they like. Make no mistake, all writers have biases. To believe otherwise is delusional. The best you can hope for is to have a writer be open and up front about his or her biases.
  3. No one is running the show. It’s a stewpot of information. It’s anarchic. It’s wonderful.

This morning, there was a breakfast session on EDA marketing and many of the same people attended this session as did last night’s BoF. Rhonda McGee, the Director of Research for EDN’s parent company Reed Business Information, discussed some stats on the habits of the peculiar species known as engineerus electronicus based on the perennial “Mind of the Engineer” research study. Buried in her handout were some pretty interesting and relevant statistics. According to the study, 93% of engineers worldwide read blogs for business purposes. (It’s a little higher in Europe and a little lower in China.) About 40% comment on blogs and 10% write their own blogs.

Marketeers in the industry are aflutter with concern that a dwindling number of people are covering the EDA arena. Based on this BoF, I have to say that I’m really encouraged at the grass-roots efforts in covering at least the topics that are important to these bloggers. I fervently hope DAC and the industry find some good ways to support the efforts of these people, at least for those who would like support. Marketeers beware: some would clearly prefer to be left alone to do their own thing. Ignore their wishes at your own peril.


Related entries in: EDA | People | Society & Culture | 


Reader Comments



at 6/14/2008 3:04:58 PM, JL Gray said:
Steve,

Thanks again for speaking at the BoF - really appreciated it!

BTW... one thing you may not have realized is that John Busco of John''s Semi-Blog, John Ford of DFT Digest and I were a few of the first "EDA Bloggers". We all got started back in 2005. Cooley has been around since before the idea of a blog really existed, so though there are similarities between his site and how bloggers publish I''d say most "bloggers" would put him into a special category all of his own (which is probably how he prefers it anyways!).

Take care,

JL
Cool Verification



at 6/14/2008 11:56:57 PM, John Ford said:
Steve, I really enjoyed your talk also - and I think your take is right on - it''s all information, and it comes from many directions, ''affiliated'' or not. I''d just like to see more of it coming from the practitioners: the engineers, the ones suffering the tools.

What makes the tools of today''s internet so great, is that those who want to share information can do so without having to engineer the medium. I agree with you, John Cooley was the first of us - he just does so with the tools of the internet that were available last century.

Cheers,
JMF



at 6/15/2008 5:14:03 PM, Steve Leibson said:
John, thanks for stopping by. I think the grass roots movement in EDA blogging is pretty great. It's a sad comment on the state of business that many people will not discuss their experiences in such forums because of fear of violating contractual agreements with the tool companies and a reluctance to help potential competitors. Yet those are today's realities and we have to live with them. So again, I raise my glass to the ones who blog. We all owe them our thanks for trying to improve our industry.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy