Steve LeibsonLeibson's Law: It takes 10 years for any disruptive technology to become pervasive in the design community. This blog is about the disruptive technologies that either have or will win over electronic engineers, some that won't, and why. Written by Steve Leibson, Tensilica's Technology Evangelist. See my history site at www.hp9825.com. You can email me by taking the first letter of my first name, appending that to my last name, then the magic email symbol, followed by the name of the company I work for, and then a dot followed by com.

View Steve Leibson's profile on LinkedIn

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Saturday, July 7, 2007

AMD Gives Transmeta $7.5M Transfusion

Jul 7 2007 8:30PM | Permalink | Email this | Comments (0) |
Blog This! using:  Blogger.com | LiveJournal |
Digg This | Slashdot This | add to Del.icio.us


On Friday, Transmeta announced that AMD had swapped $7.5M for Transmeta stock. The reason given was to "thank" transmeta for supporting AMD's AMD64 64-bit instruction-set extensions to the 32-bit x86 ISA (instruction-set architecture) and to support Transmeta's continued research into low-power processor design. The UK's online tech scandal sheet The Register conjectures that AMD is supporting Transmeta to help keep its lawsuit alive against Intel.

I covered Transmeta's coming-out party, held in tony Saratoga, CA at Villa Montalvo, as an analyst with The Microprocessor Report. At the time, Transmeta's claim to fame was a VLIW machine and compiler that could emulate the x86 architecture but consume much less power than Intel's (or AMD's) processors at the time. Transmeta's innovative LongRun technology allowed the processor to cut its own clock rate and core operating voltage based on instantaneous processing demand. These were innovations back in January, 2000 when Transmeta rolled out its Crusoe processor at Villa Montalvo. So innovative, in fact, that Intel was caught flat footed. However, Transmeta succeeded in tweaking the bear's nose and then failing to deliver in a timely manner. Crusoe processors didn't roll for several months following the announcement. Intel had time to develop its own, good-enough low-power processor technology called SpeedStep, introduced only 10 months later in October, 2000. For Intel's SpeedStep, good enough delivered in a timely manner trumped Transmeta's more elegant LongRun technology and the company's Crusoe processor became a SpeedBump.

It remains to be seen  whether there's enough of Transmeta left to innovate even with AMD's cash infusion. Transmeta has proven (as if that was necessary) that competition is really good for our industry. Here's wishing them well, for their sake as well as AMD's and Intel's.


Related entries in: Business and Marketing | Processors & Tools | 


Post a comment


Display Name

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites