Zibb

Steve LeibsonLeibson's Law: It takes 10 years for any disruptive technology to become pervasive in the design community. This blog is about the disruptive technologies that either have or will win over electronic engineers, some that won't, and why. Please feel free to link to these blog entries! Written by Steve Leibson, a marketing consultant specializing in lead generation and content creation for high-tech companies, former VP of Content for Reed Business, and former Editor in Chief of EDN. See my consulting Web site at www.sleibson.com and my history site at www.hp9825.com. You can email me at steven.leibson followed by the magic email symbol @ followed by att.net.

View Steve Leibson's profile on LinkedIn


   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Friday, December 26, 2008

Graphene Nanomemory Stores Bits in 10nm

Dec 26 2008 3:01PM | Permalink |Comments (5) |


I’ve written about graphene as a possible successor to silicon in electronics applications (see Diamonds on the Tops of our Chips: Is Carbon the Next Silicon?, What Makes Graphene Tick (or Conduct)?, and The Name’s Bond, Carbon Bond: Graphene FETs and Moore’s Law Scaling). Now comes word from Professor James Tour’s lab at Rice University of a non-volatile, 2-terminal graphene memory device that can store a bit. The device size is on the order of 10nm, which is much smaller that today’s smallest commercial FETs (about 45 nm). You can get a little more info on the memory’s operating modes here. Essentially, 4V across the device will write a bit by putting the device into a conducting state while 6V puts it in a non-conducting state. When on, the device conducts microAmps and when off, picoAmps. So the dynamic range of the graphene memory bit is a terrific million to one while Flash EEPROMs make do with 10:1. Sounds like magic.

And it is because the developers have yet to explain the underlying storage mechanism for the memory effect. They believe that the mechanism is a mechanical displacement in the lattice. The researchers do know that the graphene lattice needs to be imperfect for the effect to work. So far, the research has been done on hand-selected devices, needed to find the imperfect ones. The path to manufacturability is not yet charted and the interface circuits have yet to be developed. Nevertheless, a fascinating development for graphene and for “semiconductor” memory.


Related entries in: Memory components | Semiconductors | 


Reader Comments



at 12/29/2008 1:20:52 PM, Barbara said:
From this description it sounds like a melting-recrystallization phenomenon similar to phase change memory.



at 12/29/2008 2:24:22 PM, interesting said:
It is an interesting article. High-voltage nanomemory is kind of oxymoron. But it is also important to show the I-V and AC response to confirm the proposed mechanism.



at 12/29/2008 4:31:41 PM, Materials_Guy said:
The effect results from a voltage-induced defect in the crystal lattice, which can be repaired. Electrons usually travel ballistically through graphene, so even a small defect acts as a significant scatter-source. The real issue is how to address individual bits at that physical level.



at 1/2/2009 9:21:11 PM, insight said:
Materials_Guy is onto something. I calculated a current density on the order of 10^12 A/cm^2. This defect-sensitive mechanism must be some type of electromigration. I am thinking while the graphene may not suffer any issue, the metal contact will.



at 1/4/2009 11:35:45 AM, Steve Leibson said:
Wikipedia gives the carbon-carbon bond length at 120-150 picometers. So a 10nm-wide graphene strip is about 60-75 atoms wide. It's easy to conjecture, as Materials_Guy does, that the write voltage induces a lattice defect, which is annealed out by the higher erase voltage. Still, I'd like to see more rigorous analysis of the storage mechanism and its longevity before investing a lot of hope in this nascent memory technology. However, addressing individual memory bits doesn't seem to me to be a big deal. The graphene storage device is simply that, a memory device like a floating gate, a fuse or antifuse, a zapped gate insulator (like Kilopass or SiDense memory), or a phase-change cell. Controlling the graphene memory cell with vanilla row-and-column select logic built with 45nm or 32nm silicon CMOS doesn't seem to me to be all that hard, unless the silicon-graphene electrical interface is harder to achieve than I think it is.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites