Steve LeibsonLeibson's Law: It takes 10 years for any disruptive technology to become pervasive in the design community. This blog is about the disruptive technologies that either have or will win over electronic engineers, some that won't, and why. Please feel free to link to these blog entries! Written by Steve Leibson, marketing consultant and former Editor in Chief of EDN. See my Web site at www.sleibson.com and my history site at www.hp9825.com. You can email me at steven.leibson followed by the magic email symbol @ followed by att.net.

View Steve Leibson's profile on LinkedIn


   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Kodak Introduces 50Mpixel Digital Camera CCD Sensor

Jul 9 2008 5:43PM | Permalink |Email this|Comments (7) |


The megapixel wars continue as Kodak has just announced the KAF-50100 Image Sensor, a 50Mpixel (8176x6132 pixels) CCD sensor for large-format digital cameras. The sensor array measures 48x36mm (that's 1728 mm2). To keep on-chip speeds down, Kodak doubled the number of read channels on the sensor from the previous generation’s two to four. The net effect of this move is to double the number of output amplifiers and to halve the amplifiers’ bandwidth. The new sensor has four amplifiers running at 18 MHz as opposed to the previous generation’s two amplifiers running at 24 MHz. There’s less noise with this approach.

Another clever design trick is to add what Kodak is calling “pulse flushing,” which uses the anti-blooming drain in each receptor cell to drain the charge from all cells simultaneously just prior to exposure. In previous generations, the cells were drained by reading them out sequentially. Pulse flushing reduces the reset time on the sensor array from milliseconds to microseconds for faster “click to capture.”

In addition, Kodak has shifted the red microfilters 15nm towards blue to improve color accuracy. This change allows the sensor to get a better read on colors falling between the red and blue filters including yellow and orange. (Kodak’s familiar old yellow film boxes will be rendered more accurately, assuming you still have some around.)

Specs are here.


Related entries in: Optoelectronics | Semiconductors | 


Reader Comments



at 7/10/2008 9:20:09 AM, Meredith Poor said:
The people at the National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) are having a cow. Imagine having one of these taking pictures of Mars and having to download and store massive quantities of these images. Compressing 4x the number of pixels means 4x the computing bandwidth and all other things being equal, 4x the power. This on a interplanetary satellite. Note that all the 32GB flash product announcements haven't resulted in an available product: I can't buy one from anyone.



at 7/10/2008 5:44:17 PM, macdad said:
sweet. What is the cost?



at 7/11/2008 2:16:54 PM, stiggle said:
Such a large chip...I bet yield is very low so price will be very high!



at 7/11/2008 5:15:50 PM, Steve Leibson said:
stiggle, I think you can bet that the yield on this puppy is indeed low (measured perhaps in wafers/sensor) and that the price is indeed many thousands of dollars.



at 7/17/2008 1:08:52 PM, Michael said:
The sensor is being introduced in the new Hasselblad H3DII-50 professional DSLR for $40k in October 2008 according to dpreview.com. So don''t bother thinking about getting one unless you make lots of bucks taking pictures.



at 7/23/2008 12:00:03 PM, Meredith Poor said:
This would be pretty cool on UAVs. Presumably it could image the lint on your navel from 30,000 feet. A more general point: an expensive chip like this is going to be used with platforms where a few thousand dollars is nothing when one is spending millions on a mission. Kodak problaby has it's production sold out for awhile. Just don't ask 'to whom?'.



at 7/24/2008 9:16:40 PM, budi said:
This sensor is being introduced in the new Hasselblad H3DII-50, professional DSLR and would be pretty cool on UAVs. Presumably it could image the lint on your navel from 30,000 feet. A more general point: very expensive I think.

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites