Zibb

Steve LeibsonLeibson's Law: It takes 10 years for any disruptive technology to become pervasive in the design community. This blog is about the disruptive technologies that either have or will win over electronic engineers, some that won't, and why. Please feel free to link to these blog entries! Written by Steve Leibson, a marketing consultant specializing in lead generation and content creation for high-tech companies, former VP of Content for Reed Business, and former Editor in Chief of EDN. See my consulting Web site at www.sleibson.com and my history site at www.hp9825.com. You can email me at steven.leibson followed by the magic email symbol @ followed by att.net.

View Steve Leibson's profile on LinkedIn


   Advertisement

Profile

RSS Feed

  • Add this blog to your RSS newsreader!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

By Category

Blog

Friday, February 22, 2008

How HP Got Its First Calculators: Video Interview with Tom Osborne

Feb 22 2008 9:47AM | Permalink |Comments (17) |


This year marks the 40th anniversary of HP’s entry into the calculator market. Many, many people contributed to this event, but one person stands out. He was never an HP employee, but he designed and built the prototype machine that was destined to be the foundation of HP’s first calculator, the HP 9100A. He tried selling the design to several companies including IBM, Friden, and HP. He failed. Then luck intervened and a former co-worker from SCM (Smith Corona Marchant) got him an audience with the legendary head of HP Labs, Barney Oliver. The rest, as they say, is history. First came the HP 9100A (with no ICs except in the magnetic card reader) and then, a few years later when IC technology matured, came the HP 35. (Last year was the 35th anniversary of the HP 35’s introduction.)

The man’s name is Tom Osborne. He was instrumental in developing both of HP’s first calculators and follow on machines. He also developed a logic-design methodology based on ASMs (algorithmic state machines) that gave HP a real competitive design advantage for many years before the advent of HDLs.

I’d known of Tom for decades but we’d never met. Then, a few years back, we connected by phone and email as he helped me develop my history site that covers the development of early HP desktop calculators and computers (www.hp9825.com). During our exchanges, I got a lot of Tom’s story, which he really hasn’t told. He seems pretty modest about his significant contributions. In fact, he seems far more eager to make sure others associated with the projects get all their due credit than he is to talk about himself.

I jumped at the chance when Tom agreed to do an interview. It took us a few months to connect. Sometimes it seemed that the fates were against this meeting but earlier this month I drove up to his home north of San Francisco and spent some time with him. We talked for several hours one day. Then after I spent the night at his place, we talked for several more hours the next morning. I recorded a bit more than an hour of this extended conversation. Now I’ve edited the interview and have put it up on the Web. You’ll find it just below.

In this interview, you’ll learn:

  • How a Manhattan Project scientist inspired Tom to design a calculator.
  • Why SCM, Tom’s employer, didn’t get his calculator.
  • How Tom developed a world-beating calculator in his apartment.
  • How Hewlett and Packard ran their business and treated their competitors.
  • How the HP 35 came to be.

Tom Osborne’s story encapsulates a time when an individual could move the industry forward in a great leap very quickly. It’s also about a time when some companies (like HP) treated competitors with respect and when a young inventor could directly interact with corporate presidents and CEOs, make deals with them directly, and seal the deal with a handshake. This interview takes you back to another time in the electronics industry.

If you have trouble seeing the embedded video player below, here's the link: http://www.viddler.com/explore/sleibson/videos/4/

(Note: This is my 200th blog entry. Thanks to all who have encouraged me and egged me on.)

 

 

 


Related entries in: Computers, boards, buses | Hewlett-Packard (Computers) | People | Society & Culture | 


Reader Comments



at 2/22/2008 1:57:03 PM, Jim Fordemwalt said:
The chips in the HP35 were designed and built by the American Microsystems Inc., in Cupertino, CA.



at 2/22/2008 2:26:15 PM, Bluebee said:
Does anybody write a book about this case?
Like the biography of Philo T. Farnsworth: "The Boy Who Invented Television"?
It would show again that single persons are bringing things forward!
It's a pity that these people in the past mostly were forgotten, but now with Internet we ara able to change this!



at 2/22/2008 3:30:05 PM, JJ said:
I forwarded the link to your article hoping to see the video at home (don't spend work time watching videos), but when I got home the video was not included in your post. I am running linux at home. Why would the video that I saw embedded in your blog at the office not even appear....??



at 2/22/2008 3:55:30 PM, Steve Leibson said:
JJ, much as I wish I were an expert in Linux Web browsers, I am not. I cannot even explain why the HTML code I insert into my blog text makes a video player appear in Windows Explorer. However, I suspect whatever browser you're using doesn't support whatever mechanism Viddler is using to make the player appear. Sorry I cannot help more. You can however try to see the video directly on the Viddler.com site. search for "Tom Osborne" to find the video.



at 2/22/2008 4:31:03 PM, Steve Leibson said:
Apparently, several people over at hpmuseum.com are also having problems seeing the embedded video, depending on browser choice or security setting, so I've edited the blog entry to point directly to the video on the viddler Web site as well. Sorry for the problems.



at 2/22/2008 11:11:08 PM, TAWells said:
Thank you. Fabulous interview.



at 2/23/2008 9:17:01 AM, TomCee / Detroit said:
Steve / Tom:

Excellent Interview! The recording/archiving of this important history is priceless. Congratulations and Thank You.

TomCee



at 2/23/2008 10:54:17 AM, charles said:
Wonderful!! I love the history of technology. Keep it up.



at 2/23/2008 7:28:36 PM, EldenH said:
Very nice to see the human side of technology. I was very pleased to see Ahn Wang mentioned. I met Mr. Wang, he was a very modest person.
Thank you



at 2/23/2008 10:26:41 PM, brion said:
Way cool. During my freshman year, a friend recently out of the military showed me his HP-65 and I was smitten. I worked all summer to save up to buy my own and was lucky to have HP come out with the HP-67 late that summer of 1976. I bought one right away. Eventually it was responsible for me changing my major from ChemE to CompSci in 1978. In 1979, while working at IBM, I bought the new HP-41C to tied me until I bought an Apple II, followed by an IBM PC. I didn''t get back into calcs until my kids needed them in High School, only to find that the schools all demand TI calcs now. I bought them HP-49G+, but the schools wanted TI. I guess HP lost the war during the intervening years. The TI calcs are good too, but such monopoly power isn''t good.



at 2/24/2008 7:23:47 AM, S.Pilgrim said:
My history with HP calcs dates to the HP-35 & HP-45 in engineering school. Today my collection includes many other models! Listening to Tom Osborne makes the HP-9100 and HP-35 stories come alive like Kidder's The Soul of a New Machine.

If only HP would turn some of their talented people loose with objectives like Tom described - make it x cheaper, y smaller and z faster - what product(s) might we see today?



at 2/25/2008 6:33:06 AM, JJ said:
Steve, thanks for fixing the video link. Will watch it at home tonite.
I bought my HP35 in the summer of 72. It came from the first production run and did not have a model number. It also came with an errata card that listed math errors due to some of the algorithms used. These were fixed later with a ROM change. A couple years later in an engineering class the teacher asked everyone to calculate out a 3 x3 matrix equation. Everyone with an HP got it right; everyone with a TI got it wrong due to "too many" nested parenthesis.
I love that RPN. That alone showed the ingenuity involved at HP at the time.



at 2/25/2008 10:17:40 AM, Dave J said:
brion, it makes me sad to hear that the high school teachers selected TI. It reflects most likely the teachers'' limitations rather than those of the students. The HP learning curve is pretty steep, but the rewards are so great. (Like most of you, I went HP/RPN back in engineering school, though I was a late comer. First had a 28S which just died a couple years ago. Now have a 48GX and a 32SII.)



at 2/25/2008 11:22:25 AM, daver said:
What an amazing guy! I wonder if he knows how many areas in electonic design and solid state eletronics he influenced directly and indirectly by his gifted insight in solving problems?
I got my first calculator in my 2nd year at Devry in 1976, when Devry finally agreed to allow their EE Degree students to switch from slide rules to calculators. It was a different world then.



at 2/25/2008 5:56:30 PM, Bill said:
I well remember those days. I was in Bell Labs at the time, and my boss'' boss let me purchase one or two hp 35s per year for my organization of 40 people. As I recall, hp thought it would take about 6 months for competition to develop, but it took a couple of years and, in the meantime, their price premium was impressive.



at 2/26/2008 8:07:03 PM, codewarrior1241 said:
Fascinating interview! I certainly did NOT have an HP calc in the 70s, graduating high school in 2000 and BSEE in 2005. Until sophmore year I didn''t even know HP still made calcs until I saw somebody use an HP48. I went through many TI graphing machines, from the 81 to the 82, then the 83 for a while, and then the 89, with symbolic math and ability to do 3D modeling... My first programs I ever wrote were for then TI82. I wonder how the modern 89 stacks up against HPs latest.



at 2/27/2008 2:48:11 PM, Rod S. said:
In the early 1970''s (before the HP35) I was working for Integrated Circuit Engineering and we had a design project for a slide rule company to build a scientific calculator chip. This calculator was slated to sell for less than $200! We designed it around some serial algorithms which were slower but MUCH less complex for hardware. It was about ready for prime time when they cancelled the project because "There is no market for a $200 engineering calculator. People have slide rules for that"!!

Post a comment



Display Name

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.


ADVERTISEMENT

©1997-2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other Reed Business sites