Subscribe to EDN

Working with your hands

May 27, 2009

The NY Times has a great article about the satisfaction and joy that comes from working with your hands. The nice quote:

The trades suffer from low prestige, and I believe this is based on a simple mistake. Because the work is dirty, many people assume it is also stupid. This is not my experience. I have a small business as a motorcycle mechanic in Richmond, Va., which I started in 2002…. I have found the satisfactions of the work to be very much bound up with the intellectual challenges it presents.

But here is the deal, the author, Matthew B. Crawford also has a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Chicago. I think all good engineers have an appreciation for hands-on work. It is one of the satisfying things about engineering, that it has a heavy intellectual aspect, full of theory and math and computers, but it also has a hands-on component where you build things and solder breadboards and wire in prototypes, all the while using one of the most intellectually demanding tasks, troubleshooting. There is a reason job ads for engineers often say they need a “hands-on” person. A manufacturing company can’t sell simulations and theory. They need a real product.

Crawford has sounded off on this subject before, and I blogged about it a few years ago.

Posted by Paul Rako on May 27, 2009 | Comments (3)

May 28, 2009
In response to: Working with your hands
Kevin Szabo commented:

Engineering is so many things. It is binding to a solution while having too little information. It is knowing what data are important and what data may be ignored. I believe the latter is one of the greatest engineering skills, since we are usually inundated with data and complexity. The act of "getting your hands dirty" lets you know if you have paid attention to the right stuff and correctly ignored that which doesn't matter. BTW, great blog Paul. I read everything you write.


May 27, 2009
In response to: Working with your hands
Chris Gammell commented:

I agree, I can feel like I accomplished just as much in a day if I spend it troubleshooting a board (and finding one bad resistor) as when I spend it figuring out transfer functions on paper. Sure, the transfer function might be more crucial to the end product or give better insight into that product I'm working on but I wouldn't get too far if I couldn't implement the transfer function in the real world on a real product.


May 27, 2009
In response to: Working with your hands
Paul Rako commented:

Well yippee, we have a new comment Captcha. It sometimes requires two tries in my Opera web browser but the old system did that as well. The old system let you cut and paste the Captcha letters, which was a little broken, but it exploded a week or two ago and refused about 90% of the comments. The other weirdness was that if you had an apostrophe', it would add another apostrophe to it, for every time you tried to enter the comment. I also love that the letters are not case sensitive. I think our IT folks whipped up their own system rather than buy a pre-packaged one and the hard works shows, the equivalent of the hands-on work I talked about in the blog post. BTW, if you use Opera like me be sure to add the plug-in Aspell, and you can right-click and check spelling in any comment box. Explorer has iespell that will do the same thing.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows