Subscribe to EDN

Six million dollar home theater system

February 18, 2008

My audio-nut and eFlea pal Steve Williams sent along a link to a blog about a fellow that has build a 6 million dollar home theater. The comments in the blog cover a range of opinions from citing the waste of money to a celebration of free will and capitalism and “more power to him”. Steve writes:

Wow, this brings up a lot of mixed feelings for me! I have been employed most of my working career as an audio/video installation tech. I have installed some high-end home theater, since before the term existed, though nothing approaching this!

On the one hand I would love to have been involved with the installation of this. It would give a great sense of pride to have done it. I would love to hear it. At one time I might have tried to conceive of something like this in my head and set it as a life goal to have some sort of ultimate room such as this. Between trade shows and houses I have seen/heard some pretty incredible systems in my life.

I started to wade through the comments. There was everything from specific criticism on a technical level to alarm over conspicuous consumption of resources, use of money, global warming from power consumption etc. etc. to a few who pointed it out as a triumph of capitalism and let-the-guy-spend-his-own-money-as-he wishes- to thank you very much!

… I am more and more "in check" as you might say, about such conspicuous consumption. It does bring up great conflict about the disparity of wealth from the most to the least powerful in the world.

I guess I am still not ready though to say "you can’t go this far" but rather that if you really have that much to blow on a home theater, (or for some of us an over the top car or house or motorcycle or anything else we don’t actually "need") then we need to be at least as generous, if not more so towards those who can’t even get by or make ends meet.

Because, after you and your friends have all seen and played with the toys, which can be short term fun for all us guys especially, there is only the quest for something even more over the top that you "can’t take with you".

My own criticism of this is not so much along the lines that he should be giving some of his money to charity, as opposed to what possible real and measurable benefit can be obtained from this Frankenstein of a sound and video system. All those speakers will just cause a lot of standing waves and phasing problems and muddle the sound. All those tube amps will just heat the air and distract from the video with their glow. You wouldn’t string Christmas tree lights around your TV and you shouldn’t do this. I don’t think he should have given the 6 million to charity, I just think he can get a better system for about 10 grand. Start with a Sharp 52 inch LCD and put it close enough so it still occupies the same arc of vision as his big screen. I get great sound from the 99-dollar Sony stereo that I bought from Fry’s. OK, I would go surround sound so that means I need two more for the back channels and the subwoofer. Those big $120 speakers I got at Fry’s work great too. Some sound deadening on the walls of a much smaller room and a nice leather recliner and I suspect no really rational person could say that one system looked or sounded better than the other. In view of the fact that HD source material is 1920×1080 anyway, and having one pixel represent one pixel on a 52-inch screen seems more sensible to me than using a bigger screen, placed further away, that has to up-convert to put 4 pixels or worse, yet, some non-integer scaling of the 1080i source material. Then you can use the $5,990,000 you have left over to buy crack or other recreational drugs. That will have a lot more effect on your psycho-auditory experience than blowing $6 million and creating the cognitive dissonance that it actually made a difference. Like my buddy Fast Freddie used to say:

 

“If I won ten million in the lottery, I would spend 4 million on drugs, alcohol and gambling. Then I would take another 4 million and buy a bunch of hookers, some fast cars, a bunch of motorcycles and a big fishing boat.”

After a long expectant pause someone would always ask Freddie what he would do with the remaining two million dollars. To that he would smile and say:

“Oh, that last two million, I would just spend that frivolously.”

Posted by Paul Rako on February 18, 2008 | Comments (4)

March 4, 2012
In response to: Six million dollar home theater system
Asad commented:

Wow, amazing eoblwg structure! How long have you been blogging for? you make running a blog look easy. The entire look of your website is fantastic, let alone the content material!


February 27, 2008
In response to: Six million dollar home theater system
Jay Mackey commented:

Maybe you are confused about what capitalism is and what it isn''t. At heart it is just a theory that economic output is maximized, reaches maximum efficiency, when the means of production is owned by individuals who provide the ''capital'' to purchase those means of production. In short, private property. The means of production could be purchased by one individual, or by a group pooling their ''capital''. Since he/they own it, they make sure it is properly maintained, not stolen, and is used to it''s maximum potential. If God had wanted us to all be socialists and not capitalists, then maybe He would have made us all equally willing to work hard regardless of reward, equally conscientious about equipment that doesn''t belong to us, and equally self-sacrificing. I know of three big Christian experiments in socialism, having everything in common, and they were all failures. I don''t know of any successes. Do you?


February 21, 2008
In response to: Six million dollar home theater system
Wingnut commented:

Hi Paul! Thanks for the work on the comments system... it sounds like you know what you''re doing. I don''t know about labeling my comments as a rant, but if its your cup-o-tea, be my guest. I just write things that can maybe make people think, and see through some things that might have been hidden to them. To clarify a few other things, I am not out to piss people off, just to tell another side of things that rarely gets told, taught, or considered. Capitalism does not mean freedom for those forced into indentured servitude just to get SOME survival coupons. In fact, capitalism chains us to a pole and defines "opportunity" as only meaning one thing... job/join. And as far as positions, rankings, and ruling, everyone rotates "positions" in a decent Christian socialism, and everyone is paid the same, hopefully nothing but love... as there would be no pricetags, ownership, or monetary demandings/timecardings anymore, so no reason for money/wages. Advertising would also go. Thanks for being friendly, Paul... I appreciate that. I need to go check out "Wealth of Nations" now to see what it is, and fill-in yet another hole in my knowledge. Thanks for the ref on that! Paul and other readers... please comment. I hope I didn''t contaminate the original subject of the article... by wandering out onto a limb. The gray line between luxury and survival supply, and between need and want... came to my mind as I read the initial piece. Seeing I''m a near-fulltime anti-capitalism activist, the luxury versus need thing... makes me want to describe "the big picture" of capitalism... the one folks can''t see when they stand so close-to, or cherish so much... their "marching position" in/on the rat-race pyramid scheme itself. "Pushing stones up the pyramid". What an excellent image, Paul. Love it. I lightly-believe that capitalists, during times between civilizations on Earth, have to hand-build the Great Pyramids. It is both for punishment of forsaking others and Earth, and for building new "symbols" for the next civiliation to learn-from. I''m pretty sure that I''m the only one on the planet... who believes the Great Pyramids are there to remind us that we ALL will have a tendency to pyramid each other here on this planet. Thanks again for the reply, Paul, and readers... comment MORE please. All the best to everyone. Wingnut - Anti-cap - Bessemer Michigan USA


February 19, 2008
In response to: Six million dollar home theater system
Paul Rako commented:

Sorry, Wingnut, I inadvertently had set the comment state to "expired" so your rant did not appear until I edited both the blog post and the comment state. I have to admit, this is the greatest rant so far here at Anablog. Politics, God, religion, economics, its all there and all sure to tic off a lot of people, even capitalist lap-dogs like me. I share your contempt for mercantilism, which was debunked in 1776 by Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations, but real capitalism means freedom. The alternatives are just different flavors of slavery. It whould be great when you imagine yourself being the one holding the whip, but I assure you, odds are you will be pushing stones up the pyramid, not sitting inside the chambers.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About EDN   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   Subscription   |   RSS
© 2012 UBM Electronics. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Please visit these other UBM Canon sites

UBM Canon | Design News | Test & Measurement World | Packaging Digest | EDN | Qmed | Pharmalive | Appliance Magazine | Plastics Today | Powder Bulk Solids | Canon Trade Shows